| （摘要内容经过系统自动伪原创处理以避免复制，下载原文正常，内容请直接查看目录。） 本文将贸易告白放在竞争法和宪法中研究，即作为竞争手腕的贸易告白和作为谈吐自在的表示情势之一的贸易告白。前一属性(对象性属性)已为人们所熟知，尔后一属性(目标性属性)尚存在诸多争议。欧美列国对此曾经有较为充足而体系的实际评论辩论和司法理论，这无疑可为我国供给名贵的镜鉴。将贸易告白归入宪法谈吐自在权的掩护领域，不只对小我及法人经济行动供给更高水平的保证，有益于竞争次序的保护，并且对保护小我和法人的谈吐自在权力乃至对于增进社会政治平易近主化也年夜有裨益。愿望本文可以或许为我国将来的宪法理论供给一种可供参鉴的样本或许启示。本文以德公法为例，综合运用汗青剖析、哲学剖析、实证剖析、经济剖析和体系论剖析等办法，德语毕业论文，引见并商量贸易告白作为谈吐自在掩护的实际学说、司法判决的成长流变、掩护水平，同时商量根本权力(谈吐自在权)参与并作用受竞争律例制的贸易告白的门路和措施，也即宪法与竞争法接洽互动措施成绩，和分歧位阶价值之间的均衡整合等成绩，以便使多元的价值、多元好处都可以均衡统筹。第一部门阐释贸易告白的两重属性，即作为竞争手腕的对象性属性和作为谈吐自在权表示情势的目标性属性，以此作为叫醒告白中谈吐自在价值这一“睡丽人”的铃声，同时引见我国告白法法学进程中行政干涉过量、贸易告白遭到诸多刁难的现状。第二部门引见谈吐自在权的内在、界限，德语论文题目，和法人谈吐自在权的特色、相干文献学说、赋权根据、救援办法和掩护水平，为商量法人贸易告白作为谈吐自在而受司法掩护做实际铺垫。第三部门经由过程引见文献学说说明贸易告白应否归入谈吐自在的掩护领域，经由过程梳理司法判决展示贸易告白受宪法掩护的成长流变，借助经济剖析办法研究贸易告白谈吐自在的受限标准成绩，最初承接前文总结贸易告白作为谈吐自在的掩护水平、规模成绩。第四部门经由过程引入德国联邦宪法法院的经典司法判例加倍直不雅地展现德国司法界对于贸易告白的立场演化、剖析思绪和论点支持，尔后从体系论的角度阐释根本权参与竞争法的措施和分歧价值的较劲、权衡和弃取。第五部门借助体系论的办法说明，多元好处的均衡统筹必需经由部分法之间的联系互动，受竞争律例制的贸易告白同时遭到宪法谈吐自在掩护只是个中的一个特例。尔后经由过程论述贸易告白所含蕴的三种重要价值(平安、自在、公理)之间的关系，以为三种价值互相牵制又互相增进，任何个中一种价值都组成对别的二者的改正。最初，总括全文得出结论应该将贸易告白有前提的归入谈吐自在掩护的规模，并对其供给有异同的宪法掩护，作为公司反抗欠妥行政干涉的“矛与盾”。 Abstract: This paper will put the discussion in the advertising trade competition law and the constitution, as the trade competition wrist advertisement and freedom of speech as one of the forms of commercial advertisement. The former property (attribute) has been well known, and there are still many disputes in the future. Europe and the United States have a more adequate and systematic review of the actual system of the actual review and debate and the judicial theory, which is undoubtedly a valuable reference for our country. The commercial advertisement as constitutional free speech rights cover areas, not only for the higher level of personal and corporate economic action to ensure the supply of protection, beneficial to the competition order, and for the protection of personal and corporate power and promote free speech on social and political democracy may also benefit. This wish can be an inspiration for the future of our country's constitution theory to provide a sample for reference. Taking Germany as an example, the comprehensive application of historical analysis, empirical analysis, economic analysis, philosophical analysis and system theory analysis to introduce and discuss business advertisement as free speech covering the actual theory, judicial decisions, and the level of growth of rheological cover, discuss the power (free speech rights) to participate in and influence and opportunities method for the advertising trade competition rules, namely the Constitution and competition law contact interaction method results, achievements and differences between balanced integration order value, so that the benefits of multiple value, can be balanced and diverse. The first part explains the dual attributes of commercial advertising, as the object of property competition and as a free speech right wrist said target attribute situation, so as to wake up advertising free speech value of the "Sleeping Beauty" bell, at the same time on excessive trade, confession was many things in our advertising law administrative interference in the process of. The inner boundary of second departments, to introduce free speech rights, free speech rights and legal characteristics, the relevant literature theory, according to the rescue measures, empowerment and cover level, to discuss the legal trade advertisement as free speech by the judicial actual bedding cover. The third sector through the introduction of literature theory should be included in the advertising trade freedom of speech protected areas, combing through the process of judicial decisions show commercial advertising growth by rheological constitutional cover, by using the economic analysis method to study commercial advertising limited freedom of speech performance, the first to undertake the foregoing summary as the level and scale of commercial advertisement performance cover of freedom of speech. The Fourth Department introduced German classic case of judicial constitutional court through double intuitive show the German judiciary position on trade advertisement evolution, analytical thinking and argument support methods and differences and from the perspective of system theory to explain the fundamental right to participate in the competition of the value of law, balance and choice of rivalry. The fifth sector by means of system theory to explain, multiple benefits required by balancing the relation and interaction between the part of the law, statutes made by competition at the same time by the constitution of commercial advertising free speech is just a special case of the cover. We use three kinds of important value of commercial advertising himself (peace, freedom and justice) the relationship between the three kinds of value that contain each other and mutual promotion, any one kind of value to the other two of the correct composition. First, a summary conclusion should be drawn into the conversation with the premise of free trade advertisement cover scale, and there is difference between the constitutional cover on its supply, as the enterprise against the defective administrative interference "spear and shield". 目录: |
