以社会批评理论分析何塞·巴斯贡塞洛斯的短篇小说《托皮勒霍》An analysis of Jose Basgoncelos's short story "Topi Le Ho" with the theory of social criticism 摘要:（摘要内容经过系统自动伪原创处理以避免复制，下载原文正常，内容请直接查看目录。） 本文试用法国文学实际爱德蒙得·克罗斯提出的社会批驳实际，对墨西哥作家何塞·巴斯贡塞罗斯的短篇小说《托皮勒霍》停止解析。详细的剖析办法为寻觅、选择偏重构文本中的同义语义场和反义语义场，旨在终究深刻到与社会实际与认识形状相干的层面中去。由于在克罗斯看来，一名作家于本身说话眼前的表示，很年夜水平上能提醒他的立场。《托皮勒霍》所论述的是墨西哥近代史上最为血腥的事宜之一1929年，巴斯贡塞洛斯在总统选举中因敌手作弊落败，他的很多支撑者尔后蒙冤入狱，更有一批人于托皮勒霍地域被当政一方履行逝世刑。作者对这一真实事宜付与的虚拟颜色，不只给文章增加了可读性和文学性，西语论文网站，还为运用社会批驳实际剖析著作供给了需要的前提。巴斯贡塞洛斯外行文中将小我(孤胆豪杰)与群体(所谓“成功者”与乌合之众)、僻静与闹热热烈繁华等身分组成语义对峙的组合，由此提醒了反动分化平易近众、歪曲本相的丑恶面貌。于此同时，作者也经由过程各类手腕将对残暴实际的描述推向极致，个中包含一系列与扑灭有关的辞汇和人物描绘中的植物化等，一副后反动时代水深火热、人道耗费的气象光鲜地展示在读者眼前。对旧日无穷光辉的思念和对当下满目疮痍的悲哀，组成了小说说话中弗成被疏忽的线索之一，西语专业论文，西班牙殖平易近时代之遗产遭到看重的水平可见一斑。为了弥补伊甸园般的曩昔与饱受炮火浸礼的实际间的沟壑，巴斯贡塞洛斯选择去歌颂那崇尚精力世界的基督教，这点从宗教用语的频仍运用中可以管窥。值得一提的是，文中但凡触及拉美原居民和邻国美国的内容，无不与消极的情感接洽在一路。对以上两种身分的抵牾，异样表现在作者就墨西哥文明重建成绩的立场上。 Abstract: The trial proposed actual Edmond Cross French literature social refuting practice, of Mexican writer Jose bass tribute Selous's short stories the Topi Le Ho "stop the parsing. Detailed analysis of the search, select the partial reconstruction of the text in the semantic field and semantic meaning of the semantic field, aimed at the end of the profound and social reality and awareness of the level of coherence. Due to the cross view, a writer to speak for itself in front of said, to a large extent to remind his position. Was the most one of the bloody matters in 1929, the modern history of Mexico discussed the Topi Le Ho, Bass Gun Cyrus in the presidential election due to rival cheat defeat, many of his support, the Sumerian unjustly imprisoned, more a group of people supporting piller Huo region was during the reign of performing evanescent world punishment. Author of the matters entrusted to a virtual color, not only to the increased readability and literature, also for Applied Social Criticism practical analysis of works supply the needs of the premise. Bass Gun Cyrus lay the will of the ego (lone hero) and group (the so-called "success" and the mob), secluded combination and Bacchic copious packet idiom meaning confrontation. This reminds the reactionary differentiation plain public, distort the ugly face. In this at the same time, the author also by all means will the description of the cruel reality of acme, including series and eradication of the Related words and characters depicted in the plants of, a pair of after the revolution in dire straits, humanitarian cost of meteorological bright display in front of the reader's eyes. On infinite glorious old thoughts and devastated the moment of sorrow, the composition of the novel speak in Eph into one of negligence on the part of the clues, Spanish colonial era heritage to be subjected to the value level is evident. In order to make up for the garden of Eden like the past and suffering from the gully between the actual fire baptism, select the Bass Gun Cyrus to sing that advocate the spiritual world of Christianity, this from the religious language frequent applications can glimpse. It is worth mentioning is that the whenever touched the original residents and neighbours are the United States to the content in Latin America, all without exception and negative emotional contact in a way. For the above two identity of the conflict, in the strange position on the reconstruction of Mexico civilization achievements. 目录: 摘要 5 Introducción 10-15 Capítulo 1: Antecedentes teóricos 15-23 1.1 Antecesores de la Sociocrítica 15-18 1.1.1 El Estructuralismo Genético 15-17 1.1.2 El Sociograma 17 1.1.3 La Ideología Materializada 17-18 1.2 La Sociocrítica de Edmond Cros 18-22 1.2.1 Principios de su teoría 18-19 1.2.2 Las mediaciones 19-21 1.2.2.1 Las Microsemióticas 20 1.2.2.2 Los Textos semióticos 20-21 1.2.2.3 El Sintagma fijo 21 1.2.2.4 La Contaminación semántica 21 1.2.3 Método de análisis 21-22 1.3 Con respecto a Topilejo 22-23 Capítulo 2: Topilejo, realidad y ficción 23-33 2.1 Rese(?)a biográfica del autor 23-28 2.1.1 Ateneo de la Juventud 23-24 2.1.2 Período revolucionario 24-26 2.1.3 Candidato presidencial 26-27 2.1.4 últimos a(?)os de su vida 27-28 2.2 El paratexto de Topilejo 28-33 2.2.1 El título “Topilejo” 28-30 2.2.2 La anotación “relato” 30-33 Capítulo 3: Visiones de una Revolución traicionada 33-44 3.1 Individuo versus colectividad 33-35 3.2 Silencio versus ruido 35-40 3.3 Lo tremendo 40-44 3.3.1 La destrucción 41-43 3.3.2 La animalización 43-44 Capítulo 4: Salidas a una situación devastadora 44-55 4.1 Pasado versus presente 44-46 4.2 Lo religioso 46-50 4.2.1 Martirio y mártir 46-47 4.2.2 Pecado de Caín 47-48 4.2.3 Bendición y maldición 48 4.2.4 Fariseos 48-50 4.3 Lo prehispánico 50-53 4.3.1 La barbaridad precolombina y la contemporánea 50-51 4.3.2 Origen del nombre “Topilejo” 51 4.3.3 Indio 51-52 4.3.4 Los mexicanos hispanistas 52-53 4.4 Lo extranjero 53-55 Conclusión 55-60 Bibliografía 60-62 |
