| （摘要内容经过系统自动伪原创处理以避免复制，下载原文正常，内容请直接查看目录。） 本文以为对根本权的掩护上，德语论文网站，应侧重于根本权的限制与根本权的抵触，根本权的限制来自国度的损害，根本权的抵触则属于私家损害，德语论文题目，是以对根本权的掩护，应重要避免国度与私家不法损害。不法损害意味着存在正当的损害，在这类情形下，国民的根本权必定会遭到限制，而没法完整完成。若何辨别正当与不法损害，触及到根本权限制的基准与根本权抵触的处理。从根本权释义学而论，在触及根本权的案件中，传统的涵摄形式曾经没法知足根本权掩护的功效，权衡形式应运而生，然则权衡形式在客不雅性方面存在缺乏，是以须要在理论中经由过程若干措施来下降其客观性偏向。本文由六部门构成。绪论部门说明根本权的掩护与根本权的限制、根本权的抵触相干，若何肯定根本权的限制与抵触乃是根本权掩护的焦点地点。第一章从根本权的组成方面着手，经由过程根本权限制的内涵实际与内在实际的辨别，和根本权组成的窄要件与宽要件辨别，引出根本权释义学上权衡的需要。第二章从标准论层面上，在标准分类的成长史上作扼要梳理，在标准分类的准绳与规矩之间辨别上，重点论述阿列克西的实际，以从笼统实际上追求好处权衡的公道性。第三章着重从理论中来检视好处权衡之应用，在将德国联邦宪法法院在理论中运用好处权衡而构成的三阶密度与美国最高法院在理论中构成的三重基准比拟较后，笔者更偏向于德国式的三阶密度作为好处权衡类型化的帮助。第四章从宪法说明的特色动身，导入成果考量取向之弗成或缺性，并提出好处权衡应作为宪法说明停止成果考量时之帮助尺度。总述部门对全文作出总结，指出好处权衡虽然存在缺点，然则应予经由过程下降其客观性，施展其在根本权掩护中的感化。 Abstract: In this paper, we should focus on the protection of fundamental rights, which should be focused on the fundamental rights and fundamental rights, the fundamental right to restrict the damage from the state, the fundamental right of the conflict is private damage, is the protection of fundamental rights, should be important to avoid the state and private damage. Illegal damage means that there are legitimate damage, in this kind of situation, the fundamental right of the people will be limited, and can not be completed. How to distinguish right and wrong, and to touch the fundamental right to limit the treatment of fundamental rights conflict. In the case of the fundamental right to be involved, the traditional form of the culvert has been unable to satisfy the effect of the fundamental power. The balance of the form arises at the historic moment. This paper consists of six parts. The introduction section shows that the basic right of the cover and the fundamental right of the conflict, how to affirm the fundamental right to restrict and conflict is the focus of the fundamental right to cover the site. The first chapter begins with the basic right of the constitution, and through the process of the basic right to restrict the connotation of the actual and the internal actual identification, and the fundamental right to distinguish between the elements of the narrow and broad elements, to lead to the need to balance the right interpretation. The second chapter from the standard on the level of the growth history of the standard classification, in the standard classification of the principles and rules to distinguish between, the focus of Alexy's reality, in order to pursue the benefits of the general principle of balance. The third chapter focuses on the use of the theory to examine the benefits of balance, in the German Federal Constitutional Court in the theory of the three order density and the United States Supreme Court in theory constitute the three benchmark, the author is more inclined to the German formula of the three order of the benefits of the balance of the type of help. The fourth chapter starts from the characteristics of the constitution, the introduction of the outcome of the consideration of the orientation of the put into or lack of, and put forward the benefits of the balance should be considered as the constitution to stop the outcome of the consideration when the help scale. Department overview summarizes this thesis, points out the benefits balance although there are shortcomings, but should be through the process of decline in its objectivity, the fundamental right to cast in the role. 目录: 摘要 4 绪论 7-8 第一章 基本权保护与衡量之关系概论 8-11 一、内在理论与外在理论 8-9 二、宽构成要件理论与窄构成要件理论 9-11 第二章 衡量在规范论面向的展开—以阿列克西的准则理论为中心 11-24 一、规范论在西方二战后初期的发展概况 11-12 二、德沃金的准则与规则理论 12-15 (一) 规则之特点 13-14 (二) 准则之特点 14-15 三、阿列克西的准则规则理论 15-24 (一) 最佳化命题 15-16 (二) 碰撞法则 16-19 (三) 衡量法则 19-24 第三章 利益衡量理论之实践—以德国法为中心 24-49 一、德国公法上利益衡量要求之起源与实证化 24-49 (一) 宪法上比例准则之起源 24-26 (二) 德国基本法上比例准则之定位 26-29 (三) 利益衡量操作方式之一:利益间位阶理论之检讨 29-33 (四) 利益衡量操作方式之二:基本权限制之类型化辅助标准 33-42 (五) 利益衡量与基本权冲突—以基本权理论检视之 42-47 (六) 利益衡量之缺陷与解决 47-49 第四章 利益衡量之审视—由宪法解释之“结果考量”取向而论 49-56 一、宪法的特殊性 49-50 (一) 高度政治性 49 (二) 内涵具有意识形态性 49 (三) 规范不完整性 49-50 二、宪法解释的特点 50-51 三、宪法解释与一般法学解释之关系 51-52 四、德国联邦宪法法院实践中宪法解释的准则 52-53 (一) 宪法统一性准则 52 (二) 实践的和谐准则 52 (三) 功能的正确性基准 52 (四) 整合影响的基准 52-53 (五) 宪法的规范力标准 53 五、宪法解释是否可以进行结果考量 53-54 (一) 宪法解释结果考量的内涵 53-54 (二) 结果考量的批评 54 (三) 简评结果考量 54 六、利益衡量作为结果考量之辅助 54-56 总述 56-57 参考文献 57-61 |
