| （摘要内容经过系统自动伪原创处理以避免复制，德语专业论文，下载原文正常，德语毕业论文，内容请直接查看目录。） 百年前西法东渐之时,中国选择了年夜陆法系的德国支系,并一路成长了上去。1949年中华国民共和国树立,两岸分别局势开端构成,法律也分流了,这一成长途径仿佛也被截断,但现实上,法律办法、法律语词这些司法的构成细胞已在百年前定格,并在新的时期对两岸平易近法的成长发生着新的作用。2017年《中华国民共和国物权法》出台,标记着中公民法典立法完成了一个重要的构成部门。同年,中国台湾地域平易近法的物权编担保物权修改案三读经由过程,2017年,公则与一切权两个章节也得以修改,平易近法典的内容获得了进一步的完美。两岸同时制订和修正物权法,使得对两者的比拟具有主要的意义,经由过程这类比拟可以较清楚地不雅察到百年前继受的德公民法律说在两岸的成长状态,同时经由过程比较两岸在立法中看待德公法的立场也能够看到德公法在新时期对中公民法的作用。全文分为导论、注释、结语、参考文献四个部门。导论部门论述了选题启事,并扼要地梳理了两岸对该论题的研究状态；同时,导论的后半部门指清楚明了该论题的切入点和阐述形式。注释分为四章：第一章引见了台湾物权法的前身--《中华平易近公民法》物权编的发生配景和拔取德公法为继受对象的缘由,并经由过程对其内容和构造的剖析,得出在这一阶段中公民法对德公民法的继受还仅限于对司法条则及司法形式的照搬,即处于司法继受层面。第二章引见了台湾地域物权法的新成长,即台湾物权编2017年和2017年的两次修改。并经由过程对物权行动实际、物权法定准绳、最高额典质轨制等实际成绩的论述,提醒了台湾物权编修订的两个特色：学说继受与实务继受层面的展开和国际化视野的翻开。第三章引见了《中华国民共和国物权法》的发生进程,并经由过程对物权法的内容和构造的剖析,得出其仍深受德公法的作用。个中缘由一方面起源于汗青的延续性,另外一方面则是中公法律成长新阶段对德公法的自动自创而来,但同时指出,德公法在现今只是中国的自创对象之一,且中国物权法有着本身光鲜的中国特点。第四章起首对两岸物权法停止了比拟,指出两岸物权法仍存在许多相异的地方,但同时,两岸在新时代的交换是弗成阻拦的。在这个进程中德公法的感化是弗成疏忽的,一方面它是两岸物权法实际的基本,另外一方面两岸对德公法实际的反思与选择,又给两岸学者在学说层面上供给了一个交换的平台。最初是本文的结论部门：德公法对现代中公民法仍具有主要的作用,但跟着两岸对司法继受(自创)、学说继受(自创)和实务继受(自创)的成长,在立法上愈来愈感性,或许未来德公法的内容在中国的法典中会淡化,然则德公法的办法、德国的学说曾经深深地扎根于中国的法律中。 Abstract: A hundred years ago the west law of civil law, China chose the German branch and a way to grow up. In 1949 the Chinese people's Republic of China, the two sides were beginning to form the situation, the law also split, this growth is also a way to be truncated, but in reality, legal methods, legal words of these judicial constitute the cell has been fixed in a century ago, and in the new era of cross-strait peace and easy approach to the growth of the new impact. The introduction of the property law of the people's Republic of China in 2017, marks the completion of an important part of the civil code legislation. In the same year, China Taiwan area plain near the law of real right series of real right of pledge to modify three reading by the process, in 2017, public and all in two chapters also be revised, the content of the folk law get further perfect. On both sides of the Taiwan Straits and to develop and correction of real right law, makes the two analogy has major significance, through this kind of analogy can clearly not Yacha to hundreds of years ago following by German civil law theory in on both sides of the growth state, also through the process of comparison between the two sides of the Taiwan Straits in legislation in view de law position also can see the German law at the new period of civil law effect. The full text is divided into four sections: introduction, comment, conclusion and reference. The introduction section discusses the reason for choosing the topic, and briefly reviews the research status of the two sides of the topic. At the same time, the second half of the introduction is clear about the point of entry and the form of the thesis. Annotation is divided into four chapters: Chapter One introduces the property law in Taiwan predecessor -- "the plain near the civil law real right arranges occurrence background and adoption of German law to following the subject of reason and through the process on the structure and content analysis, it is concluded that in the public law and the civil law of German civil law after only to justice, and justice form copy, that is justice by the following aspects. The second chapter introduces the new development of the Taiwan region property law, that is, the two amendment of the Taiwan property right in 2017 and 2017. And through the process of real action, the legal principle of property, the maximum amount of code system and other practical achievements of the discussion, to remind the two characteristics of the Taiwan property Amendment: Theory and practice following the opening of the level of development and internationalization of the field of view. The third chapter introduces the process of the real right law of the people's Republic of China, and through the analysis of the content and structure of the real right law, it is concluded that it is still affected by the law of Germany. Origin of the reason on the one hand to the continuity of history, on the other hand is public law in the growth of new phase of the German law of automatically generated and, but also pointed out that de law in today is China's own one of the objects, and the real right law of the people's Republic of China has a bright oneself of Chinese characteristics. In the fourth chapter, first of all, it is pointed out that there are still many differences between the two sides in the property law of the two sides of the Strait, but at the same time, the exchange between the two sides in the new era is not blocked. In this process, the influence of Sino German public law is not an oversight, on the one hand it is the actual property law on both sides of the basic, on the other hand, the two sides of the actual reflection and choice of public law, but also to provide a platform for the exchange of scholars on the theory level. First is the conclusion section of this article: de law to modern civil law still has a major influence, but followed on both sides of the judicial succession (own), theory following by (own) and practice following (own) growth, in the legislation is getting more and more emotional, perhaps in the future de law volume in Chinese law will fade, German law, however, the German theory once deeply rooted in China's legal. 目录: |
