| （摘要内容经过系统自动伪原创处理以避免复制，德语论文网站，德语论文，下载原文正常，内容请直接查看目录。） 轻视与反轻视，最近几年来是一个愈演愈热的话题。社会实际的残暴和由此激发的不满、积怨，经由历久发酵，已使之酝变成为一个不管是学术界照样实务界都没法躲避的话题。话题虽有热议，但社会通俗平易近众和学界对此都收回了较为分歧的声响，二者的共鸣，就是取道东方，诉诸立律例制。对此，早在2017年，中国政法年夜学宪政研究所就组织了包含国度立法机关专家在内的专家小组，草拟了一份《反失业轻视法专家建议稿》，并于2017年、2017年全国国民代表年夜会时代，经由过程全国人年夜代表、政协委员，向两会提出了司法议案和提案，研究所自己，也直接向全国人年夜法工委直接提出了司法草案的立法建议。德国作为年夜陆法系的代表，素来是我国立法经历上的先导，其2017年公布实行的《普通一致看待法》现实上早就被国际学者吸纳，成为上述反轻视法草案的焦点部门。作为如许一部总的反轻视司法，自其失效至今已有七年。时代，德国粹界和实务界曾经出现出年夜量有助于认知的实证研究，这为考核该法的实行后果供给了技巧上的能够。基于这一动力，笔者选用罗特洛伊特纳和狄克曼两位学者构建的司法遵照模子，经由过程具体考核德国《普通一致看待法》的实行后果，剖析其缺乏和能够的晋升空间，从而为我国反轻视立法，详细而言，是为现成的这份《反失业轻视法专家建议稿》供给改良性看法。 Abstract: Despise and despise, in recent years is a more and more hot topic. Social reality brutality and thereby stimulate the dissatisfaction and grievances, through long-term fermentation, brew has made the change become a regardless of the academic circles still practice can't avoid the topic. Topic although hot, but society is a plain public and academia in this regard withdrew the differences are more sound, two resonance is via the East, resorting to the system of legislation. In this regard, in early 2017, China University of political science and law constitutional research the organized contains national legislative organs of the experts, the panel of experts, drafted a the anti unemployment despise law expert proposal draft, and in 2017 and 2017 national representative conference era, through the national people represent the eve, member of the CPPCC National Committee, to two proposed judicial proposals, Institute of their own, but also directly to the NPC Law Committee directly is proposed draft law legislative proposals. A representative of as the continental law system of Germany, has always been the forerunner of China's legislative experience, the 2017 announced the implementation of the general agreement look at reality of law has long been attracting international scholars and become the focus of the draft to the anti discrimination law department. As such a total anti contempt of justice, since its failure has been seven years. Era, German Nazi and practical circles had appeared out of a large number of useful in cognitive research, the assessment of the implementation of supply the skills to be able to. Based on this power, the author selects Luo Troy Turner and Diekmann two scholars to construct the judicial follow the model, through the process of a detailed examination of the German "ordinary consistent view of law," the implementation, analysis of the lack and the promotion of space, so as to China's anti discrimination legislation, specifically is ready-made this "anti unemployment despise law expert proposal draft supply improvement ideas. 目录: 摘要 4-5 Abstract 5 引言 8-9 一 规范的效力与法学的效果 9-11 （一）规范的效力 9 （二）法学的效果 9-11 二 措施性前提 11-13 （一）法学的工具式理解 11 （二）法定目标的实现 11 （三）法学规范作为态度对象 11-13 三 《一般同等对待法》实施效果的略论路径 13-17 （一）德国《一般同等对待法》概览 13-14 （二）《反就业歧视法专家建议稿》概览 14-15 （三）略论思路及模型选取 15-17 四 目标阐述 17-20 （一）立法动机的不同 17-18 （二）文件本身宣称的目标 18-20 五 禁令遵守状况不佳的难题 20-33 （一）歧视禁令的实施效果评估 20-23 （二）遵守状况不佳的原因略论 23-33 六 权利主张的难题 33-36 （一）了解程度有限 33 （二）《一般同等对待法》两个显见的角色冲突 33-34 （三）《一般同等对待法》并未出现爆炸性诉讼 34-36 七 《一般同等对待法》的司法考量 36-43 （一）总体状况 36 （二）具体略论 以间接证据为视角 36-43 八 《一般同等对待法》对我国反歧视立法的启示 43-47 （一）歧视作为心理动因的法学规制难度 43-44 （二）对我国反歧视立法的具体建议 44-47 结语 47-49 致谢 49-50 参考文献 50-54 |
