Along with the growth of the society, the discharge of solid waste is increasing rapidly, and the situation is becoming more and more serious. China's solid waste treatment is still in its initial stage, in the process of collecting, accepting, and taking over, and dealing with all aspects of the process is still a lot of shortcomings. With China on the verge of South Korea in the solid waste management in the first level, there are a lot of experience can be created. South Korean territory narrow, dense population, unlimited capital, absolutely in terms of its territorial area, South Korea solid waste occurrence quantity is overmuch. But because South Korea's solid waste purification judicial control of rail of perforative to give up on things from happening with the disposal of the entire process, give up treatment belongings fundamentally completed the cycle of economic requirements is to obtain the obvious attainments. Will China and South Korea to stop, full consideration to the advantages of the region, South Korea and other Asian countries population density is high, with face anxiously in the industrialization brought about the development of performance, the two countries although there are policies and institutional differences, but in the field of solid waste situation bilateral existence a lot of common topic. From a comparative point of view of China and the ROK's solid waste purification control legislation to stop comparing, reviewed the legislative missing and lack, suggestions for the future legislation in our country development provide valuable created, in order to promote the China circulation type social construction. Paper is divided into five departments, from four aspects of objective legislation, legal system, regulatory system style tube, the policy pro China and South Korea's solid waste pollution prevention and control legislation to stop the specific comparison, and according to the difference of China's solid waste purification control legislation perfect suggestion. The first division of China and South Korea to clean up the solid waste prevention and control of the legislative objectives of the comparison. South Korea to give up the law of the recycling economy as the legislative value and orientation, emphasizing the capital of solid waste. And China's solid waste purification legislation of the prevention and control of rail is more of the "economic growth priority," the traditional concept, coherent vertical rail is not adequate performance from reincarnation concept of economic legislation, to solid waste capital not be valued. Second departments of China and South Korea solid waste purification control of the legislative system to stop the analogy. Because formulating national law, China and South Korea belong to, is to two solid waste legislation system is with the constitution as the command, the fundamental law, to abandon the fundamental law of the trunk from the center to the premises of the absolute comprehensive legislation system. But because of differences between the legislative philosophy and the legislative body, the two solid waste purification legislation system still exist some differences. First, in the legislative system in Korea, president announced the implementation of the order of judicial standard up resistance to alleviate action. However, in our country, in addition of department laws take care of each other, the connection is there is the inevitable. Second, South Korea's solid waste purification control legislation is more specific and detailed, with a strong operational. And China's current legislation, although in the original basically has a certain improvement, but the lack of judicial standards of operational performance is still there. Third, South Korea's legislation on the solid waste is important to focus on the application of solid waste recycling. The legislation of solid waste in our country is mainly based on the prevention and control of the pollution. Third departments of China and South Korea solid waste regulatory system to stop the analogy. The regulatory system of the two countries is a vertical structure, but the South Korea trend in the local dominant and independent, and China is more trend in the central authorities of the dominant and driving type. First, the Ministry of Korea set up a special division of the capital cycle as the country to give up the reincarnation of the reincarnation of the task, and the situation of the Capital Corporation to implement the regulatory rights of solid waste. China's solid waste regulatory system is focused on the reduction and the end of purification. Second, in South Korea, non-governmental organizations play an important role in the style of the entire regulatory system. In our country, the task of monitoring and controlling solid waste is basically all exercised by the authorities, there is no non official organizations involved in the task. Third, in South Korea, by the Department in the category of solid waste implementation of the same regulatory and their respective governing bodies with as skill domain give up regulation, not only simplified the governance procedures, but also beneficial to the implementation of obligations. China's current solid waste regulatory system is the lack of a system to reconcile the same body, the presence of a stack of duties and conflicts. Fourth, South Korea's solid waste regulation encouraged the widespread participation, and the regulatory systems of administration of color is strong, about "involved in the designation of the regulation is general and general. The fourth sector of China and South Korea solid waste of a detailed control policy to stop the comparison. There are four important differences between the two countries. First, South Korea solid waste bundle policy is by "Firman and bundle" to "cooperation and symbiosis" in the form of change, for solid waste supervision the economy of bundle policy to encourage. Our country is represented as the edict of master form, the country received direct fundamentally through the waste legislation. Second, South Korea on waste governance in the occurrence and give up accepting to take over the whole process application and disposal. Our country 目录: |
