| 说话作为人类最主要的交换对象,其主要性自不用多言,但是在我们的平常生涯的对话进程中,措辞人说出的句子其意思不只仅在于句子的表层的字面意义,许多情形下,在措辞人的说话行动当中还暗含着深层的会话寄义。依据Grice.H.P的会话实际,对话介入者在协作的基本上,会话要遵照四个准则：质量准则、数目准则、相干准则和措施准则,措辞人有意违背某个准则便会发生会话寄义。是以准确懂得措辞者的会话寄义,在说话的进修进程中是非常需要的。本文以Grice. H. P的会话实际为实际基本、以Sacks话轮转换规矩为对话单元盘算尺度,运用统计的办法,从会话准则的数目、类型、违背会话准则的缘由和违背后所发生的会话寄义等方面剖析了韩国片子(?)、(?)和(?)脚本中的会话准绳违背情形。片子(?)脚本的总对话数为501个,违背会话准则的句子共有90个,占对话总数的18%。个中,违背质量准则的句子有9个,占总对话数的1.4%；违背数目准绳的句子有31个,占总对话数的6.2%；违背相干准则的句子有46个,占总对话数的9.2%；违背措施准则的句子有6个,占总对话数的1.2%。片子(?)脚本的总对话数为587个,违背会话准则的句子共有104个,占对话总数的17.5%。个中,违背质量准则的句子有12个,占总对话数的1.9%；违背数目准绳的句子有42个,占总对话数的7.1%；违背相干准则的句子有36个,占总对话数的6.1%；违背措施准则的句子有14个,占总对话数的2.4%。片子(?)脚本的总对话数为547个,违背会话准则的句子共有89个,占对话总数的16.1%。个中,违背质量准则的句子有19个,占总对话数的3.3%；违背数目准绳的句子有28个,占总对话数的5.1%；违背相干准则的句子有22个,占总对话数的4.0%；违背措施准则的句子有20个,占总对话数的3.7%。综上所述,作为一部悲剧片(?)对话中,其违背对话准则的比例要高于其他两部片子,究其缘由,重要是由于悲剧片子为了到达其悲剧后果,比拟起普通的直接陈说,由违背对话准则而惹起的会话寄义更能激发悲剧后果。质量准则的违背,其重要缘由是因为运用隐喻、夸大、反语等修辞办法二惹起了会话寄义。数目准则的违背,其重要缘由是因为措辞者不肯意供给足够的信息,由此来表达本身的喜怒哀乐。相干准则的违背重要是因为措辞者比拟起普通的表达措施,更情愿运用一些风趣的表达措施。而措施准则的违背重要是因为对话介入者对于对话情况和前提都非常懂得。 Abstract: Speaking as the main object of exchange, the main character of the language, but in our ordinary life of the dialogue process, the wording of the sentence meaning not only lies in the surface of the sentence, in many cases, in the language of people's speech act as a deep meaning. According to Grice.H.P's conversation practice, the dialogue between the participants in the cooperation, the conversation should follow the four principles: quality principle, the principle of quantity, the principle of the principle of coherence and method, the wording of the principle will be a violation of the meaning of conversation. It is necessary to know the language of the language in order to understand the meaning of the conversation. In this paper, H. P Grice. is used to analyze the Sacks (?), the type, the number and the type of the session, which is used to analyze the situation of the dialogue in the script. Film "(?)" the script of the total number of dialogue for 501, a total of 90 violation of the principle of conversation, the total number of dialogue 18%. There are 9 sentences in violation of the principle of quality, which account for 1.4% of the total number of conversations, 31 of the total number of sentences, 6.2% of the total number of conversations, 9.2% of the total number of sentences, and 1.2% of the total number of sentences. Film "(?)" the script of the total number of dialogue for 587, a total of 104 violation of the principle of conversation, the total number of dialogue 17.5%. There are 12 sentences in violation of the principle of quality, which account for 1.9% of the total number of conversations, 42 of the total number of sentences, 7.1% of the total number of conversations, 6.1% of the total number of sentences, and 2.4% of the total number of sentences. Film "(?)" the script of the total number of dialogue for 547, a total of 89 violation of the principle of conversation, the total number of dialogue 16.1%. There are 19 sentences in violation of the principle of quality, which account for 3.3% of the total number of conversations, 28 of the total number of sentences, 5.1% of the total number of conversations, 4% of the total number of sentences, and 3.7% of the total number of sentences. To sum up, as a tragedy "(?)" in the dialogue, the dialogue against the principle of proportion is higher than the other two films, the reason is important because the film in order to reach the tragic consequences of the tragedy, compared with the ordinary direct statement, by against the principle of dialogue and cause the conversational meaning can stimulate the tragic consequences. Contrary to the principle of quality, its important reason is because the application of metaphor, exaggeration, irony and so on to two from conversational meaning. The number of violating the principle, its important reason is because the speaker would not supply enough information, thus to express itself the passions. The violation of the principle of coherence is more important than the expression of the general expression of the language, but also more willing to use some of the methods of humor. The violation of the principle of the method is very important because the dialogue of the participants on the situation and the premise of the dialogue is very understanding. 目录: |
