| （摘要内容经过系统自动伪原创处理以避免复制，下载原文正常，内容请直接查看目录。） 本文测验考试从跨文明研究的角度动身，德语论文，采取实证研究的办法，对平易近族文明对中德公司文明和引导作风所发生的作用停止商量和研究。根据霍夫斯泰德的平易近族文明的五个维度中的“权利间隔和小我主义一个人主义”实际，提出了有关公司治理者引导作风和员工满足度的四个预设。经由对问卷查询拜访的成果剖析得出结论：霍夫斯泰德的文明维度实际实用于各个公司文明研究范畴。在中国公司的引导和员工之间权利间隔显著年夜于德国公司两者之间的间隔。中国公司治理者加倍认同员工的个人主义特点，而德国公司治理者重视的是员工的小我主义特点。本文重要由五个章节组成：第一章为引言部门，重要提出论文所研究的目标和重要成绩；第二章是全文的实际基本。笔者起首论述了与论文相干的几个根本概念，如平易近族文明，公司文明和引导文明等。并依据参考文献界定了三者的关系。随后体系引见了与引导文明相干的研究结果和霍夫施泰德的五个文明维度和传统的引导作风和古代引导作风；第三章运用霍夫施泰德的文明维度对中德两国的公司文明和引导文明的差别停止比较。在此基本上，以西门子(中国)企业为研究对象，以权利间隔和小我主义一个人主义两个维度为文明维度，以豪斯的途径一目的引导实际中的锻练型引导作风和支撑型引导作风作为引导行动的丈量对象，揣摸出3个中德两国治理者引导作风差别的假定，和一个从中国员工角度评价中德治理者引导作风有用性的假定。第四章是全文的实例剖析部门，以问卷的情势睁开。起首引见问卷查询拜访的介入者和研究现状。接上去对问卷的统计成果停止量化剖析，在验证假定的同时剖析引导行动与引导者文明配景之间的接洽，德语论文网站，从而得出中德两公民族文明对公司引导作风的作用。第五章对全文停止了总结，并提出此类研究的需要性和造就公司员工跨文明才能的主要性。并对论文的意义和存在的缺乏的方面做了解释。 Abstract: In this paper, the test from the perspective of cross cultural studies, to take the approach of empirical research, the impact on the Chinese and German culture of the Chinese and German enterprises to guide the style of work to discuss and discuss. According to Hofstede's five dimensions of the national civilization, "the right distance and individualism," the actual situation, put forward the relevant corporate governance to guide the style and employee satisfaction of the four preset. Through the analysis of the results of the questionnaire survey, the conclusion is drawn: Hofstede's cultural dimension is practical and practical in the field of enterprise civilization. In China, the gap between the rights of the enterprise and the employees is significantly larger than that of the German companies. Chinese corporate governance is more of the personal characteristics of employees, while the German corporate governance is the employee's personal characteristics. This article is composed of five chapters: the first chapter is the introduction section, it is important to put forward the goal and the important achievements of the paper. The second chapter is the practical basis of the whole paper. First of all, the author discusses some basic concepts related to the thesis, such as the national culture, the enterprise culture, and the guidance of civilization. And according to the reference to define the relationship between the three. Then system introduced and guide civilization relevant research results and Hofstede's five cultural dimensions and the traditional guide style and ancient guide style; in the third chapter, the application of Hofstede's cultural dimension of Sino German corporate culture and guide civilization differences compared. This basically, by Siemens (China) Co., Ltd., as the research object, in two dimensions: power distance and individualism a individualism civilization dimension, to house the way to guide practical exercise guide style and the type of support guide style as a guide to action of the measured object, fathom out three Sino German Managers Guide of the difference in style is assumed, and a boot from the Chinese employees view comments on bilateral governance style of the usefulness of the assumed. The fourth chapter is an example of the full text of the Department, to the situation of the questionnaire opened. First introduced the questionnaire survey of the participants and the current situation of research. Pick up the statistical results of the questionnaire quantitative analysis, assumed in the verification and analysis of action guide and guide people civilization with scene between contact, thus obtains the effect of German and Chinese national civilization of Enterprise Guide style. The fifth chapter summarizes the full text, and puts forward the need for such studies and the main characteristics of the enterprise staff to create cross cultural ability. And explain the significance of the paper and the lack of it. 目录: |
