| （摘要内容经过系统自动伪原创处理以避免复制，德语毕业论文，下载原文正常，德语论文网站，内容请直接查看目录。） 新加坡作为一个多平易近族、多说话的国度,采用公道的说话政策并获得使人赞许的造诣,素来是浩瀚说话学家的研究热门之一。国际外有关新加坡说话文明的研究多侧重于商量新加坡说话政策的汗青配景,四种官方说话(英语、华语、马来语、泰米尔语)的官方位置及功效。本文也是从此着手,却不局限于此--文章愿望借助对新加坡说话政策的剖析,从中提取对以后中国说话成长的无益办法。本文支撑新加坡说话政策中的“双语教导形式”,并联合中国的说话现状,提出中国将来可行的相似新加坡的双语政策形式以汉语为主,其他说话为辅,如英语、法语、日语、德语、西班牙语等,而不只仅是国际现在异常看重的英语教导。该形式的提出,自创社会学家凯尔曼的“对象性依靠”转化到“情感性依靠”的实际,并提出假定,即该转化进程存在优先性特点,目标是要证明中国采用如许的双语教导形式不只无益于通俗话的年夜力推行,保护公民特征,也会逐步减弱英语霸权在中国的作用,同时知足国际化市场对其他外语人才的需求。文章可分为以下几部门第一章引见说话政策、双语教导、及凯尔曼的转化实际,第二章剖析新加坡说话政策的汗青成长和双语教导政策,从认识形状和适用主义两方面既论证凯尔曼“对象性依靠”和“情感性依靠”实际的准确性,又指出新加坡双语教导政策的积极作用。同时在指出新加坡双语形式消极作用的基本上,提出对凯尔曼实际的假定,即转化进程中的优先性特点。第三章转入中国以后说话状态,描写国际独一官方说话通俗话的位置,英语教授教养和其他外语的情形。在对国际说话状态的剖析和“优先性”特点的实际支撑下,第四章提出在中国可采取分歧于新加坡的双语教导形式通俗话/英语/日语/法语/德语/西班牙语等语种,并提出该形式能同时处理三个成绩保护通俗话在中国独一官方说话位置,避免过度看重英语,及知足国际化市场对其他外语人才的需求。这三个成绩的处理也能使中国的说话成长状态到达一个较幻想的均衡状况。总之,紧扣新加坡说话政策的特点,本文从中自创并得出中国以后甚至未来可行的说话政策。 Abstract: Singapore, as a multi national, more talk country, the use of fair speech policy and get the praise of the achievements, has always been one of the vast talk of the study of one of the hottest. At home and abroad about Singapore speak of civilization research focus words in Singapore to discuss policy with the historical background, the four official speaking (English, Mandarin, Malay, Tamil) official position and effect. This article is from now on, but not limited to this - the desire to use the policy of Singapore's analysis of the speech, from the extraction of the future of China's growth in the way of talking. Supports this Singapore speak policy of "bilingual teaching form", and combined with the status quo of the talk of China, put forward China's future feasible similar to Singapore's bilingual education policy form mainly in Chinese, the other to speak as a supplement, such as English, French, Japanese, German, and Spanish, not only is the now abnormal value of English teaching. The proposed own sociologist Kelman's "object rely on" transformed into "emotion depends on the actual, and put forward the assumption that, the conversion process has characteristics of priority, the goal is to prove China to adopt such bilingual teaching not only unhelpful to the popular words on the eve of the force implementation and protection of civic identity, will gradually weaken the influence of hegemony of English in China. At the same time, to meet the international market demand for other foreign language talents. The article can be divided into following sections. The first chapter introduces talk policy and bilingual teaching, and Kelman reality, the second chapter analysis Singapore speak policy of historical development and bilingual education policy, from the understanding of the shape and the principle of two aspects not only argued for Kyle Mann "object rely on" and "emotional rely on" reality of the accuracy, but also points out the positive effects of Singapore's bilingual education policy. At the same time, it is pointed out that the negative effects of the bilingual form in Singapore are essentially based on the assumption that the transformation process is a priority. The third chapter talks about the status of the state of speaking in the future, and describes the position of the popular words of the international only official, and the situation of the teaching of English and other foreign languages. In speak of the characteristics of "priority" and an analysis of the state of actual support under, chapter four put forward in China can take differences in Singapore's bilingual teaching in the form of popular words and English / Japanese / German / French / Spanish language, and put forward the form can be treated at the same time three protection performance of popular words in China's only official speaking position, avoid excessive attention to English, and meet the international market of other foreign language talents demand. The processing of these three achievements can also make the state of China's speaking growth to reach a more fantasy equilibrium state. In short, the policy characteristics speak closely Singapore, this article created and draw Chinese even after future feasible policy to speak. 目录: |
