This study is one of the projects that studies the integration of social culture in the unified Korean peninsula with the academic approach. This study specifically deals with controversies of “starting points” of the novels and its adoption of Ch... This study is one of the projects that studies the integration of social culture in the unified Korean peninsula with the academic approach. This study specifically deals with controversies of “starting points” of the novels and its adoption of Chinese Literature style. We have limited the scope of study as classical literatures that was shared by both North and South Koreas. This study analyzes diverse opinions from the history of North and South Korean literature regarding the origin of novel creations. Then, the seeks to reach common ground regarding the influence of the Chinese Literature on the history of Korean literature. Chapter 2 reviews the starting points of the novels and its adoption of the Chinese literatures which have always been the discussion topics in the fields that studies the North and South Koreas. First of all, to understand the overall history of the development of oriental novels which are distinct from those of the West, we have researched the settlement process of the notion of ‘novel’. In doing this, we have researched from its etymological meanings to its genre. In the history of oriental novels, a novel is the creation that its author is verified. In the East, the fictional biography is considered as the origin of the first novel. A novel as a modern and contemporary genre that was mainly focused on the Western style shows great difference from past oriental writers’ views on the novels. This is the reason why the discussions about the starting points and origin of the novels can be confusing if we fail to set up clear definition of the novels. In this chapter, we discuss about these problems that we might encounter in defining the start point of a novel. Furthermore, we organize diverse opinions on the starting points of the novels and analyze each arguments in detail. In the academic world of North and South Korea studies, there has been a lot of theories regarding different starting points of novels. In North Korea, the theory that views “Geumo Sinhwa” written by Si-Seup Kim in 15th century as the starting points of first novels became the main current. 15th century is also viewed as a possible starting point of the novels in South Korea, but ‘Namal-yeocho (9~11th century)’ also has been a convincing time point too. Therefore, we reviewed the history of Chinese novels which states the overall history of novels relatively well, using comparative analysis. By doing this, we were able to identify the historical importance of a fictional biography in the Eastern society, and analyze the development of a fictional biography and the influence of Chinese literature based on the history of interactive influences between Korean and Chinese literatures. In the Chapter 3, we analyze more deeply on the differences between South and North Korea regarding the origin of novels. While doing this, we also deal with the theory of start points of Korea’s acceptance of the Chinese literature which shows the greatest disagreements between the North and South Koreas. In South Korea, not only 15th century but also ‘Namal Yeocho’ is considered as the possible start points. But this does not apply to North Korea’s viewpoint due to its biased literary view of history. After 1960s, establishment of “Juche” literary theory, there has been a great change in the history of North Korean literature. It has developed in a way that denies the influence of foreign literatures. Biographical literatures are also substituted by the “SuiJeon” Style. We studied this, and revealed the limitations of the “SuiJeon” style of writing which cannot be defined as a single distinctive style. In case of South Korea, all literature before novels are considered as tales because generally, Korean literatures has been developed from tales into novels. Most of the scholars distinguishes the literature before "GeomoShinhaw" to be tales or creative tales. This argues that this classification can generate extension of definition of "tales" as a separate genre and states the reasons why <Chiwon Choi> cannot be identified as a tale. This is to critically deal with the problems such as ambiguity that arise in defining literature in former periods when we conclude 15th century as the period that the first novel was created. This study analyses diverse opinions regarding the start points of novel creations, while arguing against the idea that denies 9th century as a starting point of the novel creation. in the theory that viewed <ChiWon Choi> as the first novel written in Korea, weather the piece is real or not was an important issue. However, depending on the historical data and field research on SsangneoBun, we can say that <SsangneoBungi> is the very first novel that ChiWon Choi wrote, and <Chiwon Choi> discovered in Taephyeong was written by CheokMyeong Kim in Goreo period. Also, there has been suspisions on <ChiWon Choi> being the fictional biography, so this stated the original piece of this novel <SsangneoBungi>'s characteristic as a fictional biography. By comparing with the representative novel in Korea and China <YuseonGul>, which was written in 7th century, and <Geomossinhwa> and <Manboksajeopogi> written in 15th century, <SsangneoBungi> has proved its value as a novel; three literary pieces all showed similar techniques of expression including 'Yongsa' and 'Jeongo'. <SsangneoBungi> which was the personal creative piece of ChiWon Choi was proven to be the first old novel that equips a fictional biographical aspect in the history of the Eastern novels. In chapter 4, we mention about the starting points of novels that can be reflected into the history of unified literatures along with the Chinese Literature’s influences on Korean literary works. Under the macroscopic viewpoint, we have compared the characteristics of North and South Koreas' history of literatures. Then we discuss about the purpose and characteristics of the history of the unified literature. The history of the unified literature should be established with the purpose of integrating North and South Korean citizens' cultural societies, and academically, objective analysis should be applied in doing this. Also, under unified literature, arguments regarding the influence of the Chinese Literature, which has been controversial in North and South Korean history are not often shown. The history of unified Koreas sees importance of accepting foreign literatures in proving the distinctive characteristics and superiorities of our own literature verses global literatures. This allows us to have balanced viewpoints. Subsequently, we have proposed the ways to integrate terms of calling “Old novels” or fictional biographies. Also, regarding the truth of <Chiwon Choi> which generated a lot of controversies, this concluded that the orignal work that Chiwon Choi has created was <SsangneoBungi>, and other retouched works in the later periods are called <ChiWon Choi>. This has also shows that the starting point of the novel in the unified literature can be <SsangneoBungi> which was written in 9th century by ChiWon Choi. According to this, this argues that old novels and literatures written from 9th century should be dealt with deeply. This has organized ‘when the starting point of novels is’ which has sparked a lot of controversy especially in the history of North and South Korean literature. This could contribute in establishment of unified history of literature as a part of the integration of social cultures and scholarship. Through this study, we forecast that North and South Korean academia could proceed in more integrated way, and write the history of unified literature would be possible without any problems. Especially, we expect this to be the basics and integrations of other basic humanities including philosophy or historical studies. As a result, we can overcome the division of different academic worlds, and become the whole Korean Studies that integrates Chosun studies and Korean studies together. ，免费韩语论文，韩语毕业论文 |
