中韩两国探望权制度比较探讨[韩语论文]

资料分类免费韩语论文 责任编辑:金一助教更新时间:2017-05-05
提示:本资料为网络收集免费论文,存在不完整性。建议下载本站其它完整的收费论文。使用可通过查重系统的论文,才是您毕业的保障。
跟着列国经济文明的飞速成长,列国离婚率互比高下,我国也跟着改造的赓续深刻传统不雅念逐步淡化退色,韩语毕业论文,离婚率骤升,离婚已成风行,离婚后因看望权而发生的胶葛也日趋增多,作用后代的身心安康。若何充足掩护离婚后单亲未成年后代的身心安康,给他们供给温馨的生长情况,已成为离婚轨制重点斟酌的成绩。2001年4月,我国新婚姻法也划定了看望权轨制,为离婚后看望权的行使供给了根据,更是为怙恃仳离的单亲后代能获得的怙恃的关爱供给了实际基本。但司法划定过于笼统,在现实运用中面对履行难等艰苦。比起我国,韩国经由过程屡次修正完美平易近法和家庭诉讼法,划定看望权不明白的情形下不克不及离婚等详细内容,注解了韩国当局对家庭成绩和家庭政策的存眷水平。本文除绪论和结语共分为四章,重要采用比拟剖析的措施,研究两国的看望权轨制。第一章是看望权轨制概述,论述看望权的概念和特点、性质、成长过程,中韩两国的立法现状。看望权是以怙恃后代关系为基本的身份权力,两国设立看望权的立法目标是出于掩护单亲后代的正当权益。第二章和第三章是周全论述两国看望权轨制的详细内容,韩国固然设立看望权轨制的时光不长,但因受英美法系的作用慢慢树立了后代最年夜好处准绳,而中国因受传统文明的作用外行使看望权进程中父本位思惟仍占比重,无望我国从单亲后代好处斟酌找出合适我国的立法门路。第四章是采用比拟剖析的措施,具体总结我国看望权轨制设立以来外行使准绳、主体规模、行使措施、中断、履行等方面在司法理论傍边存在的缺乏和所面对的立法窘境,同时找出韩国看望权轨制的优胜性,更是要找出自创于我国实情的韩国看望权轨制的理论经历和立法理论。针对我国看望权轨制立法晚理论经历少等现实,自创韩国看望权轨制的优秀经历和胜利判例,提出我国应该明文树立后代最年夜好处准绳、扩展看望权主体规模、细化看望权行使和履行内容,韩语论文题目,充足掩护仳离家庭的单亲后代的正当权益,给单亲后代供给优胜的心思生长情况。

Abstract:

Along with the rapid development of the civilization of the nations economy, nations divorce rate each other to compete, China also followed the reform continuously deep traditional indecent read gradually fade fade, the divorce rate is soaring, divorce has become a popular and divorce due to visit right and glue Gregory is also more and more, affected by future generations of physical and mental health. How adequate cover after the divorce single adolescent offspring and Ankang, give them warm supply growth, has become the focus of the results considering divorce system. In April 2001, the new "marriage law" also delineate the visit right rail system, for divorce after the visit right exercise provides the basis, is for parents divorced single parent offspring can get parents care and provided a theoretical basis. But the law is too general, in practice difficult to carry out the hard face. Than that of my country, South Korea by repeatedly modified perfectly plain in law and family law, delimit the visit right do not understand the situation cannot divorce and other details, annotation of the South Korean authorities of family problems and policy kept the attention degree. In addition to the introduction and conclusion is divided into four chapters, the important method of comparative analysis, research between the two countries to visit the right system. The first chapter is the overview of visit right system, discusses the concept and characteristics, see the nature of right, the growth process, the legislative status of China and South korea. To see is to parents and children relationship as the basic identity of power, the right to visit two established legislative goals for the legitimate rights and interests of parent offspring. The second chapter and the third chapter is comprehensive exposition of the two countries to see details in rail system, South Korea of course set up visit right track of time is not long, but due to the influence of the Anglo American law system to gradually establish the offspring of the biggest benefits principle, while China influenced by traditional culture because of the exercise see right in the process of male teachers still accounts for the proportion, hopeless in China from one parent progeny benefits consider to find appropriate legislative opportunities in China. The fourth chapter is the comparative analysis method, detailed summary of our country visit in rail system since the establishment of the layman to principles, body size, exercise method, interrupt, and performance of lack and facing the legislative dilemma in judicial theory and find the Korean visit in rail system superiority is to find from creates in the actual condition of our country of Korea visit in rail system theory and the theory of law. In view of our country visit in rail system legislation late theory experience less realistic, homemade Korean visit in rail of the excellent experience and successful case, proposed China should expressly establish offspring the biggest benefits principle, extended visit in body size and refine the visit right to exercise and perform content and adequate cover of divorced families of single parent offspring of the legitimate rights and interests, to single parent offspring to provide superior mind growth.

目录:

免费论文题目: