| 中心与处所的关系成绩，一向是我国粹术界的热门成绩。对于处所事务的若何划分、处所当局若何监视，学术界众口纷纭。但是对其停止剖析都离不开是处所立法权的成绩，详细如处所立法与上位法的关系、处所立法进程、处所立法事务、和处所立法监视等。以往比拟法的文章，多集中于美国、德国、日本等世界年夜国的研究。本文基于丰硕视角动身，对韩国的处所立法状态停止引见，停止初步的中韩轨制比拟，抛砖引玉，以待后续研究。斟酌到韩国的单一平易近族国度的配景，本文集中于我国普通处所的立法轨制与韩国处所立法轨制的比拟。参照我国粹者周旺生的不雅点，本文将处所立法轨制归为四个方面停止比拟普通处所立法整体支配、普通处所立法进程、普通处所立法事务和普通处所立法监视。本文分为绪论、中韩普通处所立法轨制整体比拟、中韩普通处所立法进程比拟、中韩普通处所立法事务比拟、中韩普通处所立法权监视比拟、结论六个部门。在本文的绪论部门，起首论述选题意义在于，懂得中韩两国在分歧法次序下对处所立法这一配合司法成绩的分歧答复，因为中韩有类似的文明配景和汗青传统，韩国的处所立法对于我国的将来的立法体系体例的改造具有相当的自创意义；其次简述两国处所立法的分歧汗青成长，以为两国的处所立法的成长都遭到政治的作用，然则只需有准确的实际指点和勇于改造，短时光内也能获得轨制建构的伟大造诣。在中韩普通处所立法轨制整体比拟部门，侧重论述两国宪律例定，引见韩国的轨制性保证实际及其意义，韩语论文范文，以为我国改造理论缺少特有处所立法实际的指点。在中韩普通处所立法进程比拟部门，经由过程两国的处所传递轨制和行政机关位置的比拟，引见韩国处所立法进程中的再经过议定轨制，和处所自治集团首长与处所议会的互相制衡轨制，以为我国的下层处所自立性缺乏，和行政、立法机关在立法进程中缺少互相沟通和制衡。在中韩普通处所立法事务的比拟部门，经由过程两国处所事务权限的分派尺度和内容的比拟，引见韩国的司法保存准绳和下层自治集团优先准绳，以为我国处所事务缺少自力性和专属性，和事务竞和时缺少了了化。在中韩普通处所立法权的监视比拟部门，经由过程两国中心机关、立法机关、司法机关、居平易近等分歧正面监视的比拟，引见韩国的抗告知讼、机关诉讼、权限争议诉讼、宪法诉愿、居平易近投票、居平易近呼唤、居平易近诉讼等措施，以为我国缺少法制化的立法监视体系体例，缺少居平易近直接介入轨制。本文经由过程两国的轨制的引见和比较，对我国的普通处所立法的改造提出以下思虑和建议在处所立法与宪法的关系上，宪法应当准绳化，强调引进或许树立处所轨制特有实际，以指点改造理论；在处所立法进程上，强调尊敬处所行政机关，强调沟通及制衡，同时应当树立居平易近介入轨制，增强直接平易近主轨制扶植；在处所立法事务方面，不是简略的从情势动身，而是应当强调从事务性质方面停止分派，韩语论文题目，同时应当强调下层行政集团优先准绳；在处所立法监视的方面，应树立多条理、广规模的法治门路既应当在自上而下的层面，从行政、立法、司法三权的角度动身停止制衡和监视，更应当在自下而上的层面，强调处所居平易近的直接介入和市平易近集团的普遍运动，在国度与社会关系中构成良性互动，使得改造进程中的分歧群体好处得以表达、得以整合。瞻望我国的将来的处所立法的改造，因为牵扯到立法体系体例、国度构造情势等浩瀚方面，虽然须要政治力的断定，但是最主要的是处所立法的法治化，例如宪法法院的树立或许是机关诉讼、居平易近诉讼等情势的引入，使得处所立法的平易近主、制衡等法治价值在立法事务、立法进程、立法监视中经由过程司法轨制完成，树立处所立法的法治化形式，使得在小我好处与司法轨制之间、全体价值与司法轨制之间，赓续提出成绩、树立学说、处理成绩，理论与实际的轮回重复，终究完成持之有恒的处所立法改造，早日建成社会主义法治国度。 Abstract: Results the relationship between the center and the place, has always been a hot academic achievement our country. How to divide, local authorities to monitor on the premises of academic affairs, everybody talking at once. But it can not be separated from the results of the legislative power of the premises, such as the relationship between the local legislation and the upper law, the legislative process of the premises, the legislative affairs of the premises, and the legislative supervision of the premises, etc.. Previous article, more concentrated in the United States, Germany, Japan and other countries of the world's research. The departure based on the fruitful perspective, to South Korea's local legislation status introduction, stop preliminary South Korea rail system match, initiate, pending further research. In view of the South Korea's single ethnic country, this article focuses on the legislative system of China's ordinary premises and the comparison of the legislative system of Korea's premises. I refer to the quintessence of the organizers of the indecent point. In this paper, the local legislation rail of return for four aspects compared ordinary local legislation as a whole domination, the legislative process of common premises and common premises of legislative affairs and common premises surveillance legislation. This paper is divided into introduction, China and South Korea ordinary local legislation rail system overall analogy, compared to China and South Korea ordinary local legislation process, compared to China and South Korea common premises of legislative affairs, South Korea ordinary local legislative power monitoring compared, conclusions of the six departments. In the preface part of this paper, first of all focuses on the significance of the topic is that know China and South Korea in method agree well with the sequence of local legislation that cooperate with the judicial achievement differences reply, because South Korea has the similar civilization with landscape and historical traditions, South Korea's local legislation on China's future legislation system transformation has considerable significance; secondly described the two local legislation of different historical development, thought political growth of our local legislation was, but just have accurate theoretical guidance and the courage to transform, short time can also get great attainments of the rail system construction. In the China Korea senior local legislation rail system as a whole compared departments, emphasis is put on the discussion of the two constitutional rules set, the introduction of South Korea's rail system guarantee and the actual significance, the thought theory of the reform of China's lack of specific local legislation practical advice. In China and South Korea ordinary local legislation process compared to the Department, through the process of the two countries place transfer rail system and administrative authority position compared to introduce that the South Korean local legislation process and agreed upon by the rail system, and the head of the local autonomous group and the local Council checks and balances the rail system that lack of the lower place of independence, and the executive and the legislature in the legislative process, lack of communicate with each other and checks and balances. In China and South Korea common premises of the Legislative Affairs Department contrast. Through comparing the process between the local affairs authority distribution scale and content, introduce that the South Korean judicial preservation principle and autonomous group of lower priority principle that lacks the our country local affairs, independence and specialization, transaction and competition and the lack of. Surveillance in the South Korea common premises of legislative power compared to the part, through process between the central authorities and the legislature, the judiciary, plain near equal discrimination positive surveillance compared to introduce Korea counterappeal know litigation, Litigation Authority, authority dispute litigation, Consititutional, residents near vote, residents call, ranking the plain near the litigation method, that China's lack of legal legislation surveillance systems, lack of residents near directly involved in rail system. This paper introduces and compares the system through the process of the two countries, put forward the following suggestions on the relationship between thinking and place legislation and constitution of the transformation of China's general local legislation, the constitution should be standardized, establish a system of premises may emphasize the introduction of specific practice, to guide the transformation of theory; in the legislative process on the premises, place emphasis on respect the administrative organ, emphasize communication and balance, and should establish the residents to participate in the system, enhance the direct democracy construction; in place of legislative affairs, not simply from the situation to start but it should be emphasized to stop distributions from the nature of the business, at the same time, it should be emphasized that the lower priority principle in the administrative group; local legislation surveillance hand, should establish a multi-level, wide scale law should not only in the way from top to bottom level, from the administrative, legislative and judicial right angle three Start stop check and monitoring, should be at the bottom level, emphasizing place ranking of the plain near the direct intervention and city residents group of a widespread movement, in the state and society to form a positive interaction, to be expressed, to integrate the benefits in the process of transformation of the differences between the groups. Transformation of future prospect of China's legislation premises, because involves legislation system, structure etc. the vast country, although that will require political force, but the most important is the premises of legislation by law, such as establishing the constitutional court may be introduced into organ litigation and residents litigation situation, makes plain place near the main balance of legislation, the value of the rule of law in the legislative affairs, legislative process, legislative monitoring through the process of the legal system, establish the rule of law in the form of local legislation, and between personal interests and judicial system and judicial system between the value, achievement, set theory, put forward to solve the problem, theory with the actual cycle repeated, eventually completed the transformation of local legislation perseverance, the early completion of a socialist country ruled by law. 目录: |
