| 中韩古典婚恋文学，即中韩两国描述现代男女相悦相恋之事的文学著作。此类著作中男女主人公之间常常有着一个牵线搭桥的中介人脚色，个中传播较为普遍、作用较为深远的、描述较为形式化的恰是为男女二人传书递笺、传话望风的丫环抽象一如西厢记之红娘。“红娘”典范人物与“红娘”叙事形式配合存在于中韩两国，其在文本中的性能与感化和面前的社会意理及平易近族文明内在异常具有比较研究价值。本文包含以下几个部门起首，绪论里提出了浏览文本进程中发明的“红娘”景象的存在，初步考核中韩两国的研究现状后以为，不管中韩，对“红娘”典范的研究都不敷充足，对两国此类典范的比较更是少之又少。因此筹划运用比拟文学的相干实际，试图剖析出“红娘”典范在文本中详细的性能与感化，进一步透视经由过程其同异性披露出来的两国的社会意理与平易近族文明的共通处与差别点。研究文本领域包含中韩两国描述男女情事的古典著作，文体不限。从中国的笔记、传奇、话本、杂剧、章回小说，到韩国的华文小说、韩文小说、说唱类小说(即“盘骚里”类小说)，只需是描述男女相悦相恋甚至亲事纠葛的著作，免费韩语论文，都被归入本文的研究规模内。其次，总结归结了两国此类著作中退场的“红娘”型人物，发明中国从汉至清的笔记、传奇、话本、章回小说及戏曲中都赓续地有此类人物绽放异彩，与此相反的是韩国的“红娘”仅仅涌现于李朝中前期的部门古小说著作中，但是配合的时期配景都是隔断表里、以媒通婚的封建社会。再次，撷取了两国相干著作，对“红娘”典范在详细文本中的详细性能与感化加以剖析，得出了两个结论。一是在礼教威严、闺防严谨的封建社会里，蜜斯身旁的侍女是她们要与外界接触沟通的少有的副手与桥梁，因此佳人才子的故事里佳人经由过程“红娘”型人物来接近才子、故工作节的睁开以“红娘”为依托成了比拟固定的叙事形式。即，“红娘”是闺阁世界与外界沟通的桥梁，同时也是小讨情节成长的推进者。二是佳人虽相符中韩封建社会的审美，韩语毕业论文，但是实际与心思都处于绝对弱势的他们没法完整承当寻求者的重担，此时文本中的“红娘”常常千伶百俐，自动地或被要求地赞助佳人得以与才子亲近、进而缔娶亲约；同时封建审雅观请求才子严厉地遵守礼教标准，这与自在爱情就发生了抵触，此时煽动蜜斯与佳人相会的“红娘”就帮助蜜斯完成了对“礼”的遵照一越礼的是丫环，蜜斯是主动的蒙受，并没有违背封建礼教。即，“红娘”是“弱势”佳人的助力与“守礼”才子的陪衬。接上去进一步剖析其社会意理及平易近族文明本源，发明“红娘”典范在中国的风行是因为“媒人制”与“不偏不倚”的作用。即作为中介人而涌现的“红娘”其实实质是媒人个人有意识的沉淀一以同化的“媒人”来证实爱情而成的婚姻也是与社会品德审美相同一的，同时也是作者想要认可人欲自然爱情自在却不敢完整打破封建“媒婚制”，试图让自在爱情与封建礼教协调共处，追求“中庸温和”的成果。而“媒人制”在韩国的作用其实不像中国那样深远，韩国对“礼”的遵守也其实不像中国那样严苛，同时对“情”的表达也绝对豪放热闹，因此没有“红娘”型人物年夜量存在的情况。 Abstract: China and Korea classical literature of marriage and love, namely China and South Korea to describe modern men and women love pleasing things literary works. These works between the hero and the heroine often have a matchmaking agent role, medium dissemination is more common and more far-reaching impact, description is more formal, is exactly what two men messenger handed abstract the memo, a message on the lookout for the maid as "Romance of the Western Chamber" the matchmaker. Exists in China and South Korea "matchmaker" model character and "matchmaker" narrative form complexes, the in text in performance and influence and presence of social psychology and plain nearly nation civilization intrinsic abnormalities with more research value. This paper includes the following departments chapeau, the introduction proposed browse text in the process of the invention of the "matchmaker" scene, preliminary assessment of China and South Korea's research present situation that, regardless of China and South Korea. Study on the model of "matchmaker" was not enough for adequate, for such a model between the two comparison less and less. Therefore planning application of comparative literature of related theory, tries to analyze "matchmaker" model in the text with the performance and influence, further X-ray through the process with specific disclosure out of their social psychology and plain near family civilization the similarities and differences between them. The research text field contains two descriptions of men and women of any classical works, style is not limited to. From China's notes, legend, story telling scripts, drama, novels, to South Korea's Chinese novel, Korean novels, rap category novel (that is, "Sao" Novels), only need to describe both male and female Yue works of love and marriage disputes, have been included in the scope of the study. Secondly, summarized the such works between the two exit "matchmaker" type character, invented in China from the Han to the Qing notes, legends, stories, novels and drama are ceaselessly with such characters in full bloom splendor, and the opposite is South Korea's "matchmaker" just emerge in early news Li Department of Ancient Novels, but with period with Jindou is partition table, to the media intermarriage of feudal society. Again, to capture the two coherent works, analyze the "matchmaker" model in the detailed text with performance and effect, it is concluded that the two conclusions. One is in ethical dignity, boudoir anti strict feudal society in, honey beside the maid is their contacts and communication with the outside world rare deputy and bridge, so stories of gifted scholars and beautiful ladies beauty through the process of "matchmaker" type characters to wit, so the working day open to "matchmaker" relying on into the relatively fixed narrative form. That is, the "matchmaker" is a bridge of communication with the outside world boudoir, is also a small plot to promote growth. Second is a beauty. Although consistent in feudal society of China and South Korea aesthetic, but the actual and mind in absolute weak they can not complete bear seekers burden, at this point in the text "matchmaker" often extremely clever and bright, automatically or for sponsorship with the wind be wit and close, and associating the wedding about; at the same time the feudal instance elegant request wit strictly abide by ethics standard, which and free love occurred in the conflict. At the same time, incite, honey and beauty to meet the "matchmaker" help honey completed the "ceremony" of the follow a violation of moral is the maid, honey is active suffer, and not contrary to the feudal ethics. That is, the "matchmaker" is "weak" beauty and power "rite" wit foil. Pick up and further analysis of the social psychology and plain near family civilization origin, the invention of "matchmaker" model in China's popular because "matchmaker" and "impartial". That as an intermediary and the emergence of the "matchmaker" in fact is matchmaker individual conscious of precipitation a assimilation "matchmaker" to that love and marriage and social moral taste the same, also is also the author wants to recognized human desire love freedom but not complete broke the feudal "media marriage system", trying to make peace with the coordination of free love and feudal ethics, the pursuit of "moderate" results. And "matchmaker" in South Korea's influence in China is not so profound, South Korea of "ritual" abide by actually also unlike China, harsh, and the expression of the "feeling" is absolute bold lively, so there is no "matchmaker" type character. 目录: |
