After 60 years of the 20th century, economic globalization the growth speed is becoming faster and information technology penetration level is getting higher and higher, do cause alive in economic circles in the main position is more prominent. Vigorous national fundamental were in 80 in the mid - early is smoothly completed the transformed from manufacturing to do cause of structural adjustment, do industry accounted for their respective countries GDP proportion of diverse reach or over 60%, some countries and across 800%, explain the global economy has been basically grow into service economy format situation, the center of gravity of the business world once beginning from trade in goods to business tilt. Under such big background, China, Japan and the ROK authorities also beginning height reissued career and service trade, service trade of the romance of the three kingdoms were the rapid growth, work scope of business there has been expanding ceaselessly. China, Japan and South Korea to do business in the early development of the two countries, coupled with the strong support of the manufacturing industry has already reached the level of the world's predecessors, Japan's business has been booming. But conditions of growth of Japan's service trade but its office of international position of the cause of the growth in the state and its flourishing nation was not matching, Japan did not follow the comparative advantage more export skills, capital and knowledge intensive service. In contrast, China and South Korea to do business and business development, there are many similar places. First of all, the development of the two countries are started late, the end point is low; secondly, the two countries do not bend the cause of the structure, are focused on growth and rest and capital intensive work. But in terms of absolute, South Korea's certain to do business than China grow faster and better, such as South Korea's transportation industry has grown into the world to pre empt the degree. Nothing more than since the reform and opening up, China's business growth rate is faster, the average annual growth rate of business has reached 18%, far across the two countries, Japan and South korea. In 2011 China's total business volume has broken through 400 billion U.S. dollars, the business and business development space and potential is very big. At the same time, China and Japan, China and South Korea bilateral business also followed China's foreign business growth is strong and has a rapid growth. According to 2010 data show, China South Korea in Asia in the eve of the first service business partner is Japan in Asia's second-largest service business partner, Peter during the China Japan South Korea economic and trade relations is becoming more and more intimate. But in Japan, China and South Korea bilateral trade in services has been concentrated in service to transport, tourism and other trade belongings business and China to Japan's service trade since 2006 by the surplus into deficit, the deficit amount also increased year by year. China to South Korea's service trade is in deficit, but China to South Korea's inverse difference should be less than the Japanese inverse difference, it's enough to explain Chinese in Japan, China and South Korea bilateral service trade export advantage in a gradual decline. Japan there is an urgent need to stop the transfer of the Department of belongings, South Korea is eager to can further expand the size of the market, while China wants to the belongings structure stop into the class also need the introduction of advanced technology and full use of internal capital and market. Therefore, sets up the idea of China, Japan and South Korea Free Trade Area of the early in 2002, has, in recent years the authorities of China, Japan and the ROK repeated negotiations, put forward to accelerate the establishment of China, Japan and South Korea free trade area. Back if China, Japan and South Korea free trade area set up will undoubtedly further enhance mutual economic cooperation and trade between the three countries, and bring opportunities and challenges to the Three Kingdoms, but trust opportunity rather than challenge. China can own the experiences of Japan and South Korea to further grow to do business and trade in services, but it can also in the presence of adverse effects, can long-term impact China International soft skill intensive and knowledge intensive business office. In such circumstances, evaluation of China, Japan, South Korea trade in services growth degree and in Japan, bilateral service trade status, master influence in Japan, China and South Korea bilateral trade in services of all sorts of element and offset if China, Japan and South Korea Free Trade Zone set up after in Japan, China and South Korea bilateral trade in services to the harmful effects of and further promotion and deepening of Sino Japanese and Sino Korean economic relations has the extremely important practical significance. This paper analyzes the China, Japan and the ROK and Japan, bilateral service trade status, and then use a series of target analysis and comparison of the China, Japan and the ROK in the degree of international competitiveness of 2000 and 2010 era although differences of target measure out the level of competitiveness of some differences, but all can see pet. In the meantime, there is a certain gap between three of the service trade competitiveness, but the difference is not big. And the United States, the United Kingdom, India and other countries in the United States, Britain, and other countries have a very big difference, is the need to develop business and enhance the competitiveness of the three countries. Later used TC index to measure the in Japan, China and South Korea bilateral trade in services of all and the objectives of the core competence, points out that the competitiveness of China in Japan, South Korea bilateral trade in services were gradually reduced, but South Korea's service trade competitive advantage than Japan slightly higher. In the business of certain items, such as finance, insurance, proprietary rights and royalties, China's absolute lack of competitive advantage. China's business competitiveness depends on the rest and capital intensive traditional business support, the new ancient 目录: |