中韩买卖合同制度的比较探讨[韩语论文]

资料分类免费韩语论文 责任编辑:金一助教更新时间:2017-05-05
提示:本资料为网络收集免费论文,存在不完整性。建议下载本站其它完整的收费论文。使用可通过查重系统的论文,才是您毕业的保障。
现今世界,国际经济一体化已成为弗成逆转的趋向,在如许的配景下,作为下层修建的列国司法轨制之间的交换也日趋频仍。从生意合同这个最根本最具代表性的司法轨制动手,对中韩两国生意合同的各项详细轨制停止比拟研究,可以见微而知著,对两国生意合同轨制立法思想及形式的差别和两年夜法系间赓续融会的趋向有较为深入的熟悉。是以对两国生意合同轨制之间的比拟研究,有益于我们在保持本国的优良司法传统的同时,接收和自创韩国的生意合同轨制,有益于我们对现行的司法轨制停止修改以顺应社会经济成长的须要。跟着中韩经济成长过程的赓续深化,中韩之间的商业来往也日趋频仍,生意合同是最根本的生意业务情势。然则中韩两国国情分歧,政治轨制分歧,其司法轨制的成长过程也年夜不雷同,在生意合同范畴,两国的司法轨制出现出分歧的特色。本文起首论述了中韩生意合同的成立前提,接着对生意合同成立的详细轨制停止了比拟,要约和许诺是招致生意合同有用成立的弗成缺乏的两项行动。1999年中华国民共和国合同法对于要约和许诺的划定根本采用了结合国国际货色生意合同条约的有关划定,经由过程剖析韩国生意合同,也联合我国现实对我国的生意合同的成立停止完美和弥补。其次,经由过程中韩生意合同的效率比拟,剖析了合同两边主体的权力责任关系。第三,在一切权转移和风险累赘方面,中公法学的划定均以交付为界线,而韩公法学还强调货色切实其实定,是以两国在这一成绩的划定上对生意两边落第三人好处的掩护的着重点分歧,掩护形式上存在差别。最初经由过程两国分期付款生意合同的比拟剖析,找出了两国对分期付款生意合同的异同并对完美我国的分期付款生意合同轨制提出了若干建议。

Abstract:

In today's world, international economic integration has become irreversible trend, under such a background, as a lower layer built nations judicial rail system of exchange is becoming more and more frequent. From a business contract the most fundamental most representative judicial rail of hands-on, on business contract of China and South Korea the with rail system stop comparative study, can see and know, on bilateral business contract rail system legislation thought and form difference and two of the eve of the law gengxu fusion tend to have more deeply familiar. Is in between the two business contract rail system comparison research, beneficial to us in maintaining the nation's excellent traditional justice at the same time, absorb and profit from the Korean business contract rail system, beneficial to us on the rail of the existing judicial system stop modified as necessary to conform to social and economic growth. Along with the process of Sino South Korea economic growth continuously deepen and business dealings between China and South Korea have become increasingly frequent, business contract is the fundamental business situation. But China and South Korea differences in national conditions, political differences, the growth process of its judicial system is also different, in the scope of business contracts, the two countries have different characteristics of the judicial system. This paper first discusses the establishment of China and South Korea business contract, and then the establishment of a detailed system of business contract to stop the analogy, offer and commitment to lead to the establishment of a business contract useful into the lack of two actions. 1999 "in the people's Republic of China Contract Law" on the offer and promise the designation simply by the the United Nations for international sales of goods contract Treaty of the relevant provisions of the, through the analysis of the process of Korean business contract, combined with the establishment of our country reality of our country business contract stop perfection and to make up for. Secondly, through the comparison of the efficiency of the business contract between China and South Korea, the power responsibility relationship of the two sides of the contract is analyzed. Third, in all the power transfer and the risk burden, delineation of the public law were to deliver the boundaries, and Han Gong law also stressed that the goods and in fact set, is on both sides of the border in the delineation of the three benefits for the unsuccessful business on both sides of the cover of the key differences between, cover form there is a difference. First, through the comparison of the two countries' installment business contract, we find out the difference of the two countries on the installment business contract and put forward some suggestions on the perfection of the contract system of the installment payment in our country.

目录:

摘要   6-7   Abstract   7-8   第一章 绪论   10-12       1.1 探讨目的与意义   10-11       1.2 探讨范围与措施   11-12   第二章 买卖合同的成立   12-20       2.1 中国买卖合同成立的法学规定   12-14       2.2 韩国买卖合同成立的法学规定   14-17       2.3 中韩买卖合同成立规定的比较   17-20   第三章 买卖合同的效力   20-26       3.1 中国买卖合同效力的法学规定   20-22       3.2 韩国买卖合同效力的法学规定   22-24       3.3 中韩买卖合同效力规定的比较   24-26   第四章 买卖合同中的风险负担转移   26-35       4.1 中国买卖合同中风险负担转移的规定   26-30       4.2 韩国买卖合同中风险负担转移的规定   30-32       4.3 中韩风险负担转移规定的比较及借鉴   32-35   第五章 分期付款买卖合同   35-42       5.1 中国分期付款买卖合同的规定   35-36       5.2 韩国割赋买卖合同的规定   36-39       5.3 中韩分期付款买卖合同的比较及借鉴   39-42   结语   42-43   参考文献   43-45   致谢   45-46   附录A:攻读学位期间发表论文目录   46  

韩语论文题目韩语论文题目
免费论文题目: