| 话语标志语是指没有本质性语义或许本质性语义损失,用于说话中,使高低文关系明白,措辞人客观意图获得有用表示的拔出语。话语标志语方面的研究是语用学研究的一个新兴课题。本文以中韩平常会话中的语料为基本,从语用的角度动身,对中韩话语标志语语用功效停止了剖析和比拟。本文运用定性剖析法,剖析和综合之前学者所做的话语标志语的界说,得出较能反响中韩话语标志语特色的界说。同时运用了分类归结法,考核中韩两国粹者依据各类分类尺度做出的分歧分类,并加以总结归结,为论文主体的比较研究奠基基本。论文还重要运用了比较研究办法,比较提炼出的四对中韩说话中经常使用的话语标志语,找出差异点,停止了剖析,比拟,总结。本文共分五章,第一章重要论述了本文的研究目标,研究配景和研究办法;第二章重要商量了话语标志语的界说与根本语用功效;第三章考核了之前学者的分类办法,提出本文彩用的分类尺度;第四章依据第三章中对话语标志语的分类,将详细的研究对象分为短句类话语标志语和非短句类话语标志语停止比较,本文列出的短句类研究对象有“话说回来”与“? ???”、“对了”和“???”,个中“话说回来”与“? ???”作为回说自述型话语标志语,都具有回说自述功效、相干话题转换功效、唤起对方留意功效、话题导入功效、话题深化功效,但“话说回来”有其独有的弥补功效,“? ???”有“话说回来”不具有的转机功效;“对了”和“???”都具有的语用功效重要有话题转换功效和话题导入功效两年夜类,同时“对了”有其独有的半语法化形状和话题睁开功效,“???”有弥补解释功效、强调功效和委宛功效;非短句类研究对象重要有“啊”和“?”、“甚么”和“?”,个中“啊”和“?”都具有的语用功效有核心化功效、歧视等语气强化功效、要求确认功效、弱化语气功效、添加劝止语气功效、停止功效,作为它们分歧的语用功效,“啊”可以自力运用,“?”具有尊称功效和分隔功效;“甚么”和“?”作为话语标志语既可以自力运用,也能够作为句子的一部门涌现,自力运用时它们都表达对之前说话内容的困惑或惊奇,作为句子的一部门涌现时,它们都具有替换功效,否认功效,保持话轮功效,除此以外,“甚么”还具有话题导入功效,话题转换功效,话题答复功效,“?”具有弱化赞成语气功效,暧昧话语功效,等;第五章为结论部门。本文彩取的语料重要为电视剧中涌现的对话、台词等,切近实际生涯,白话性较强,可以比拟好的反响出话语标志语所具有的语用功效。经由过程对详细语料的细心剖析,明白有较强对应关系的中韩话语标志语之间的差异,有助于外语进修中对承载文明底蕴的话语标志语的精确应用,同时有助于对中韩跨文明交换中对说话语境和措辞人心态,甚至所反应的社会文明景象的精确掌握,在学术方面为往后此方面的研究供给了一些可供参考的比较办法。 Abstract: Discourse markers are not essential semantic or semantic loss of nature, used to speak, so that the relationship between the level of understanding, the wording of the objective intention to obtain useful expressions. The study of discourse markers is a new topic in the field of pragmatics. Based on the data from China and Korea, this paper analyzes and compare the pragmatic functions of Chinese and Korean discourse markers from the pragmatic point of view. In this paper, the qualitative analysis method, analysis and comprehensive researches of discourse markers definition that is the definition of the language features of discourse of Chinese and Korean response markers. At the same time, the application classification resolution method, assessment in Korean pure according to various classification standards made by different classification and summarizing for a comparative study of the subject of the foundation. The thesis is also an important application of comparative research approach, the comparison of the four extracted from China and South Korea are often used in the discourse markers, to identify similarities and differences, to stop the analysis, comparison, summary. This paper is divided into five chapters, the first chapter discusses the important research objectives, research background and research methods; the second chapter discuss the important discourse markers of the definition and basic pragmatic functions; the third chapter examines previous classification methods, this paper proposed classification scale color; the fourth chapter on the basis of the third chapter of the discourse sign language classification, detailed research object is divided into phrase class discourse markers and non phrase class discourse markers stop the comparisons, this paper lists the research object "phrase class back" and "????", "right" and "???", the "back" and "????" replied as readme type of discourse markers, has said the efficacy, readme topic conversion function, coherent function, pay attention to arouse each other into effect, deepen the topic topic effect, but "back" has its unique remedy effect, "??? ? "" back "does not have the transfer effect; the" right "and"??? "Has the important pragmatic functions of topic and topic conversion efficiency into effect two categories, while the" right "has its unique shape and semi grammaticalization open topic effect,"??? "To compensate for the explanatory power, and stressed the effectiveness of euphemistic effect; the research object is an important kind of non phrase" ah "and"? "," what "and"? ", the" ah "and"? "Is the core of the pragmatic effect of efficacy, enhancing the efficacy of tone discrimination is required to confirm the efficacy, and weaken the tone effect, add tone effect, stop stop effect, as a pragmatic function of their difference," ah "can independent application,"? "With known efficacy and separation effect;" what "and"? "As discourse markers can be used independently, can also be used as a sentence Emergence of departments, independent application they all express to speak before the content of confusion or surprise, as part of a sentence appeared. All of them have substitution effect, deny the effect, turn holding effect, in addition, "what" also has topic into effect, the topic turns change effect, topic answer efficacy, "?" has weakened in favor of tone effect, ambiguous words effect, and so on. Chapter five is the conclusion of the Department. This paper from the important data appeared in the TV drama dialogue, lines, close to real life, vernacular is strong, can match the response discourse markers pragmatic functions of language. Through the detailed corpus carefully analyze understand the similarities and differences between language strong corresponding relations between China and Korea discourse markers, help in learning a foreign language of bearing cultural discourse markers to accurately use, while helping to South Korea on cross-cultural exchange in speaking context and language mentality, even the reaction of the social cultural phenomenon accurately, in the academic field for future research in supply the for reference comparison method. 目录: |
