| 2012年1月16日,中国互联收集信息中间(CNNIC)宣布了第29次中国互联收集成长状态统计申报(下称申报)。该申报显示,截至2011年12月底,中国网平易近范围曾经冲破了5亿,到达5.13亿,全年新增网平易近5580万。中国的互联网普及率较2010年晋升4个百分点,到达38.3%。韩国的网平易近比例更高,自1994年韩国有了贸易性互联网办事以后,韩国网平易近的数目就一向呈稳固增加趋向。据不完整统计,早在2003岁尾,年纪在6岁以上的4500万的韩国人中,运用互联网的比例高达68%,网平易近数目到达了惊人的3067万,排在美国、中国、日本、印度以后,成为第五个互联网用户数目跨越3000万的国度。因而可知,不管是中国照样韩国,都曾经正式进入了收集年月,但是,与此相伴生的是,两个国度收集不良行动也一日千里,若何增强研究上的协作,互相进修接收彼此的优点,为两国更好、更有用地防控收集犯法供给名贵的指点就是两国粹者应该卖力看待的成绩。在第一章中,笔者起首梳理了国外和中韩对收集犯法概念熟悉的成长变更,并对中韩收集犯法概念停止了比拟;接上去研究了中韩两国对收集犯法特色熟悉的赓续深刻,比拟了中韩学者对收集犯法分歧特色的熟悉；最初,研究了中韩学者对收集犯法根本类型的熟悉的赓续深化,并对两国收集犯法分类的研究结果停止了比拟。在第二章中,笔者对收集犯法最多见信息之一“收集色情信息”停止了研究,起首研究了收集色情信息的界定及其特点,然后研究了中国对收集色情信息社会伤害熟悉的赓续深刻、以后中国管理收集色情信息的重要妨碍和中国对收集淫秽色情信息治理与掌握的法制演进；接上去研究了韩国收集色情信息根本情形及管控成长,提醒了以后韩国管理收集淫秽信息的重要妨碍,重点摸索了收集空间中的淫秽物规制的相干立法；最初对于中韩收集淫秽信息研究及遏制停止了比拟。在第三章中,笔者对收集犯法最多见信息之二“威逼收集情况及盘算机数据和体系平安信息”管控的汗青演停止了体系的研究梳理,起首剖析了盘算机病毒的界说及特色,提醒了此类病毒的寄素性与隐藏性、沾染性和埋伏性；然后,对黑客行动的界说及特色停止了研究；在该章第三节中,笔者对伤害收集情况平安及盘算机数据和体系平安的信息的伤害及其管理窘境停止了研究；接上去,笔者剖析了韩国应对伤害胁收集情况及盘算机数据和体系平安信息的演进,详细从应对系统和以后韩国收集空间病毒和黑客应对系统存在的成绩停止了略论；最初,笔者对中韩防控威逼收集情况平安及盘算机数据和体系的信息的研究和理论停止了若干思虑,指出了各自的成就和缺乏。第四章对换整收集谈吐自在法制的沿革停止了研究,起首研究了中国划定谈吐自在司法内容的成长变更及其实际限制,提出了实用了中国的完美建议；其次,对韩国收集空间的表达自在及其限制停止了研究；同时还研究自创了美国限制收集自在的汗青沿变及其启发；在第四节中,笔者对中国强化互联网管束的摸索过程从管束互联网司法赓续完美、行业自律赓续摸索、社会监视日趋强化和积极摸索实名制等停止了摸索；笔者在第五节中对韩国强化互联网管束的摸索停止了研究；最初,对中韩收集管束的法制内容停止了若干比拟。第五章重要摸索了两国规制收集犯法刑律例范的演进、现状及成绩。起首,研究了中国收集犯法刑律例范的立法沿革,和以后中国收集不良行动能够成立的犯法及其存在的成绩；接上去对韩国规制收集犯法司法标准的演进及其存在的成绩停止了实际商量；最初,笔者提醒了收集犯法对中韩刑事穷究法式法的挑衅。第六章重要梳理收集办事商及其义务的演变。起首剖析了收集办事商侵权的重要类型,然后对收集办事商承当侵权义务法理根据的成长停止了摸索；然后对中国调剂收集办事商义务立法的成长及存在的成绩停止了研究,研究了中国调剂收集办事商义务的重要立法及其存在的成绩；以后,笔者对中国现行收集办事商侵权义务立法存在成绩的解救提出了若干针对性的看法,重要包含应该划定“被侵权人”告诉担保责任和完美信息收集流传权掩护条例；接上去,商量了收集办事商能否能够承当刑事义务的成绩和韩国互联网办事供给者(ISP)的义务成绩。 Abstract: In January 16, 2012, China Internet Network Information Center (CNNIC) announced the "twenty-ninth China Internet collection and growth status statistics declaration" (hereinafter referred to as the "Declaration"). The report shows that as of the end of 12 in 2011, the Chinese people's network has broken through 500 million, reaching the end of the year, the new network for the year 55 million 800 thousand. China's Internet penetration rate was 4 percentage points more than in 2010, reaching 38.3%. South Korea's net proportion of higher, since 1994 after the South Korean trade Internet service, the number of Korean network has always been a strong increase in the trend. According to incomplete statistics, as early as the end of 2003, age 6 years old of above the 45 million South Koreans, the proportion of Internet applications up to 68%, net plain number nearly reached the amazing 30.67 million, came in after the United States, China, Japan, India, become the fifth the number of Internet users across 30 million of the country. Thus shows, regardless of is China still South Korea, have officially entered the collection date, however, is accompanied with this, the two countries collected adverse action by leaps and bounds, how to strengthen the research on the cooperation, learn from each other to receive each other's advantages, for the two countries to better and more useful to collect prevention and control illegal supply valuable pointing is the two pure who should take a hard look at the results. In the first chapter, the author first reviews the foreign and China and South Korea to collect crime concept familiar growth change and for South Korea to collect crime concept to carry on the comparison; pick up the research between China and South Korea to collect crime characteristics familiar gengxu deeply, compare the Chinese and Korean scholars to collect crime method agree well with the characteristics of knowledge; finally, the study of the Chinese and Korean scholars to collect crime types familiar ceaselessly deepening, and the two countries to collect crime classification research results have been compared. In the second chapter, the author of one of the most common illegal collection of information "collection of pornographic information" for the research on the first collection of pornographic information on the definition and characteristics, and then study Chinese to collect pornographic information continuously, deeply familiar with social damage after China management collection of pornographic information and hinder Chinese to collect important pornographic information control and mastery of the legal development; then discusses the Korean collection of pornographic information and control the basic conditions to grow, reminds Korea after the management important preclude the collection of obscene information, mainly explored relevant legislation to collect obscene matter in space regulation; the first collection of pornographic information on Korea Research and containment are compared. In the third chapter, the author collected the most common crime of information two "bullying collection and computer data and information system safety control system to stop the play history research review, first analyzes the definition and characteristics of computer viruses, remind the virus to send in and hidden, and contamination wait; then, definition and characteristics of the hacking of the study; in the third section of this chapter, the author collects information safety and damage computer data and system safe for damage and its management dilemma is studied; then, the author analyzes the harm and threat the South Korea should collect data and computer the evolution of information system security, and response system in detail from Korea after collecting space virus and hackers to deal with the system performance is analyzed; the author first, prevention and control of China and South Korea threat collection situation The research and theory of the information of the state security and computer data and system has been studied and the theory has been stopped, and the achievements and the lack of it have been pointed out. The fourth chapter on the history of the whole collection of free speech by the study, first discusses Chinese designated free speech content growth change and the actual judicial restrictions, put forward practical suggestions China perfect; secondly, freedom of expression and restrictions on South Korea collecting space for the research and discussion from the United States; limit free collection along the history change and its inspiration; in the fourth section, the author explored the process of strengthening the Internet Chinese bundle from Internet, continuously perfect the judicial control of industry self-regulation, social supervision is strengthened continuously grope and actively explore the real name system to stop the exploration; strengthen the Internet bundle to South Korea in the fifth quarter to grope for the research initially; the legal content of China and South Korea to collect some more bundle stop. The fifth chapter explored two important regulation law evolution, collecting fan status and achievement of criminal law cases. Firstly, studied the collection of Chinese criminal legislation evolution of criminal law norm, and after China to collect adverse action to set up the crime and the existing achievements; pick up on Korean regulation collect criminal judicial standard of evolution and the existing achievements stopped actual discuss; initially, I remind the collect criminal provocation to the ROK criminal part in French law. In the sixth chapter, it is important to comb the evolution of the collection service providers and their obligations. First analysis of the collection service provider tort important types, and to collect service providers shall bear the tort liability law according to the growth of stopped exploring; then China scheduling of network service providers of compulsory legislation development and existing achievements of research, the study of the Chinese adjust collection service business obligations of important legislation and existing achievements; after that, the author of China current 目录: |
