| 作为胶葛处理轨制的无机构成部门，诉讼机制与非诉讼胶葛处理机制(即诉讼外胶葛处理机制)因为各具优势，历久以来，配合在胶葛处理范畴施展着感化。然则无须讳言，作为胶葛的终究处理措施，诉讼因为其独有的国度强力性和严厉标准性，一向备受胶葛主体的喜爱和国度的推重，以司法周全代替其它胶葛处理措施已经是近古代法治目的。然则，曾几什么时候起，非诉讼机制开端惹起人们的看重，韩语论文，诉讼外胶葛处理措施日趋得以普遍应用。在美国，在德国，在英国，在韩国、中国……非诉讼胶葛处理机制曾经成了一股势弗成挡的潮水。为何会涌现这类景象？非诉机制本身又有甚么样的价值？这些都是值得商量的。 ADR 是Alternative Dispute Resolution 的简称，中文多译为“非诉讼胶葛处理机制”，免费韩语论文，作为一个通用概念，在东方列国，它已成为诉讼外胶葛处理措施的统称。在韩国，因为公民的天性在传统上对诉讼持排挤和不信赖立场，历久以来，法院诉讼外的胶葛处理门路被更多地加以运用，在ADR 年夜潮囊括全球的时期配景下，韩国在完美和增强司法诉讼救援的同时，对原本的诉讼外胶葛处理机制加以迷信地改革，使之更好地顺应今朝韩公民事胶葛处理的须要。面对“诉讼年夜众多”困难的中国更多地寄愿望于司法改造，试图经由过程审讯措施改造，进步诉讼效力来处理数目激增的平易近事胶葛，汗青悠长的非诉机制绝对遭到萧条，虽然在今朝状况下，中国的轨制设计者已看到了ADR 机制的主要性并积极付诸行为，但绝对仍有较年夜尽力空间。对于ADR 机制，因为各种缘由，两国的成长格式出现分歧面貌。作为一衣带水的东亚友国，中韩两国在文明渊源、公民心态和价值断定尺度上有很年夜的共通的地方。响应地，二者之间就有较年夜的可比拟性和研究价值。本文试图对中韩两国的ADR 机制造一实证的比拟研究，以现有的浅陋见识为两国非 Abstract: As glue Gregory processing rail of the inorganic part, litigation and non litigation glue Gregory processing mechanism (i.e. litigation glue Gregory mechanism) because of its own advantages, long-term since, with glue Gregory in the scope of the display effect. However, needless to say, as the glue Gregory eventually processing method, litigation because of its unique national strength and strict standards, has been highly glue Gregory subject of love and country held in high esteem, to judicial comprehensive replace other glue Gregory processing method is already near the ancient rule of law to. But, once a few times, the non litigation mechanism began to arouse people's attention, the process of litigation outside the plastic Ge processing method is increasingly widely used. In the United States, in Germany, in the United Kingdom, in South Korea, china...... Non litigation plastic Ge treatment mechanism has become a trend of the tide into the block. Why the emergence of such a scene? What is the value of non litigation mechanism itself? These are worth discussing. ADR is Dispute Resolution Alternative, referred to as the Chinese translation of "non prosecution of plastic Ge processing mechanism", as a general concept in the East, it has become the process of litigation outside the plastic Ge processing methods. In South Korea, because the citizens of nature in the traditional litigation to crowding out and don't trust position, long-term since, outside the court proceedings glue Gregory treatment opportunities is more to be applied and surges in the eve of the ADR include the era of the global background, South Korea in the perfect and enhanced judicial relief at the same time, to the original litigation glue Gregory processing mechanism to be a scientific reform, to better conform to the current Korean civil glue Gregory processing needs. In the face of many difficulties China more to send the desire to judicial reform, trying to reform through the process of trial method, the effectiveness of progress to deal with the surge in the number of people in the long history of non litigation mechanism is absolutely depressed, although in the present situation, China's rail system designers have seen the ADR mechanism and active behavior, but there is still a lot of effort to space. About ADR mechanism, because of various reasons, the growth of the two countries have different forms of appearance. As a narrow strip of water East Asian friends, China and South Korea concluded that civilization origin, citizen mentality and value scales have very big common place. In response to the ground, there are more than the eve of the two comparable and research value. This paper attempts to comparative study of ADR machine to China and South Korea made a demonstration, to the existing shallow insight for the two non 目录: 前言 10-11 第一章 ADR总览 11-17 一、 ADR的界定 11-12 二、 ADR的方式 12-13 三、 ADR的特征 13-15 四、 ADR的兴起与发展及其原因 15-16 五、 ADR的价值略论 16-17 第二章 ADR在中国 17-26 一、 中国ADR总述 17-20 二、 法院外调解 20-23 三、 法院调解 23-26 第三章 ADR在韩国 26-36 一、 韩国ADR总述 26-29 二、 法院外调解 29-32 三、 法院调停 32-36 第四章 中韩两国ADR比较 36-44 一、 法院外调解的比较 36-39 二、 法院调解的比较 39-44 结语 44-46 参考文献 46-48 论文独创性声明 48 论文使用授权声明 48 |
