| 20世纪80年月进入了经济全球化的时期，经济全球化包含商业全球化、金融全球化、技巧全球化、休息力全球化等等。区域一体化获得赓续成长，世界性经济组织的感化日趋凸起，全球化潮水对当局也提出了新的请求和挑衅。国度行政学院竹立家博士也指出：“二十一世纪的竞争，不只仅是公司与公司之间的竞争，更是当局之间的竞争。由于，古代社会的竞争是轨制的竞争、治理的竞争。”市场经济世界年夜潮下的列国当局，惟有以高效力的完成机制即市场为模范停止年夜刀阔斧的行政改造，自创市场机制的功效优势，弥合当局机制的功效优势，方能从微观上真正晋升本国的焦点竞争力，韩语论文题目，从而使本国当局在国际竞争中立于不败之地。1989年德国的同一，1990年苏联的崩溃，停止了器械方的历久暗斗，并激发了国际政治次序的急剧变更。在这场变更中，国际次序由以“认识形状”为中间改变成为以“经济效力”为中间，特殊是经济方面，1995年世界商业组织(WTO：World Trade Organization)体系体例的出台，简直一切的市场都在一步步走向开放，构成了世界列国进入互相间“无穷竞争体系体例”的局势。在这些全球化、信息化、处所化与运营化等情况的变数下，“若何造就进步应对才能”可以说是进步当局无穷竞争时期中的国际竞争力的基本要素。是以，世界列国也熟悉到了现有的当局行政体系体例已没法顺应急剧成长变更的21世纪，开端努力于对当局停止调剂，对行政组织停止改造和重组。一些蓬勃国度为顺应急速变更的行政情况，已经由过程一系列的行政改造，引导着当局和国度的改革，而对于地舆地位邻近、文明配景类似的中韩两国也绝不破例。特殊是比来中国胜利地参加了WTO，在对外开放和对内改造的年夜准绳下，则更须要在多方面停止行政改造和当局机构改编。韩国则因在90年月末期阅历了极其严重的经济危机，也急需尽快加快经济增加，年夜规模修订国度成长计谋，停止相符国际化时期的当局机构改造。中韩两国当局均应武断地停止行政改造与机构精简，做到政企离开，义务与权限分歧，量力而行，在法制行政的年夜准绳下，做出了对国务院的本能机能停止再调剂及年夜幅度缩减了人力等基本性的改造。韩国在98年金年夜中总统在朝以后，也停止了年夜范围的行政改造和机构精简，将相似或反复的内容停止统合和破除，将着眼点放在了进步国度竞争力，进步国民生涯质量…叮y of life）上。中韩两国虽实行了如许一系列的改造办法，但权要们的腐烂和公职的公有化景象并未完整消逝，还仍然存在着，韩国也涌现了国度竞争力逐年降低的问I题。是以，两国的当局改造并未进入完美阶段，还须要在很多部分停止更始与变更。基于如许的实际配景，本论文以新公共治理实际为基本，深刻阐述了中韩两国的改造计划及其后果，并对“中韩两国可否具有顺应国际化时期当局机构”的成绩提出了无益建议。本论文共分为四章。第一章概述了在全球化配景之下当局治理面对的挑衅，东方国度的经历和启发，和新公共实际所设定的当局改造偏向。第二章归纳综合阐述了中国当局机构改造，韩语论文，包含1998年国务院机构改造的背景、目的和准绳，当局本能机能在7个方面的改变，国度公事员轨制的完美情形，财务金融改造，当局运动的法制化。最初归纳综合了中国国务院机构改造的后果。第三章归纳综合阐述了韩国当局机构改造，包含1998年中心当局机构改造的背景、根本偏向与特点，当局的改革计谋，当局本能机能在5个方面的改变，机构和人员调剂情形，阐述了当局运做体系7方面的改造情形。第四章对中韩两国机构改造停止了评价和比拟，总结了改造理论中的经历经验，归纳综合阐述了新公共实际在中韩两国机构改造进程中的运用，总结了研究的局限性，提出了对后续研究的建议。 Abstract: In the period of economic globalization in the 80 years of twentieth Century, the economic globalization includes business globalization, financial globalization, skill globalization, the globalization of rest and so on. Regional integration to obtain the ceaseless development, the action of world economic organizations are increasingly prominent, the tide of globalization to the authorities also put forward new requests and challenges. State Administration of the University of bamboo Dr. Zhu also pointed out: twenty-first Century competition, not only the competition between enterprises and enterprises, but also the competition between the authorities. Because of the competition of the ancient society, the competition of the system and the competition of governance." Market of world economy big tide of the governments of various countries, only to high potency of the complete mechanism of the market as a model stop knife of the eve of the broad axe of administrative reform, created the efficacy advantage of market mechanism, bridge authority mechanism of efficacy advantage to from the micro real promotion core competitiveness of domestic, so that national authorities in international competition in an invincible position. The 1989 collapse in Germany at the same time, the Soviet Union in 1990, stop the infighting long-term instruments, and stimulate the rapid changes of international political order. In this change, the international order from the "form" as an intermediate change become to "economic effect" as the center, especially economic, the introduction of the 1995 World Trade Organization (WTO:World Trade Organization), system style, almost all of the market are in a step by step to open, constitute the world nations into each other between "infinite system of competition style" situation. In these circumstances, such as globalization, informationization, localization and operation, "how to make progress to deal with" can be said to be the basic elements of the international competitiveness of the progressive authorities in the infinite period of competition. Is that the world has also been familiar to the existing authorities of the administrative system has been unable to adapt to the rapid growth of the changes in twenty-first Century, began to stop the adjustment of the authorities, the administrative organization to stop the transformation and restructuring. Some vigorous country to adapt to the rapid change of the administrative, has by the process of a series of administrative reform and guide the reform of national governments and, and on the adjacent to the geographical position, cultural background similar to that of China and South Korea is not an exception. In particular, China has successfully participated in the WTO, open to the outside world and the transformation of the eve of the principle, it is necessary to stop the administrative reform and government agencies in many aspects of adaptation. South Korea has experienced an extremely serious economic crisis at the end of 90 years, but also urgent need to speed up the economic growth as soon as possible, the scale of the development strategy of the country, to stop the transformation of government agencies in line with international era. Sino South Korean authorities shall be arbitrarily stop administrative reform and institutional streamlined, do separation of enterprise from administration, obligation and authority differences, capabilities, and in the eve of the principle of administrative legal system, make the natural function of the State Council stop dispensing and greatly reduced the human fundamental transformation. Korea in 1998, Kim after President of the moving, but also to stop the large-scale administrative reform and streamlining the organization, the similar or repeated content integration and to get rid of, will focus on the progress of national competitiveness, and improve the people's quality of life. Bite of life y). China and South Korea although implementation of such a series of reform measures, but right to their decay and the public the public scene did not disappear completely, there are still, South Korea has also appeared in the national competitiveness gradually reduce the Q I question. In China, the authorities did not enter the perfect stage of reform, reform must stop and change in many parts. Based on such practical background, this paper to new public management theories, expounded the China and South Korea plans to transform and its consequences, and the "China and South Korea could have put forward beneficial suggestions to conform to international period authority" results. This paper is divided into four chapters. The first chapter outlines the challenges faced by the authorities in the context of globalization, the experience and Inspiration of the eastern countries, and the transformation of the government in the context of the new public practice. The second chapter comprehensively expounds the China's transformation of government agencies, including background, purpose and principle of the institutional reform of the State Council in 1998, government function change in seven aspects, country officeholder system perfect situation, financial reform, sporting authorities legalization. The consequences of the transformation of China's State Council are summarized in the first. The third chapter comprehensively elaborated the South Korean authorities institution reform, contains the background of 1998 the central government institutional reform, fundamental bias and characteristics, authorities of the reform strategy, government function in five aspects of change, institutions and personnel adjustment situation, expounds the authorities operation system transformation. The fourth chapter of China and South Korea the institutional reform of the stopped assessment and comparison, summed up the experience of the transformation of, summary describes the application of new public practice in China and South Korea institution reform process, summed up the limitations of the research, put forward suggestions for subsequent study. 目录: |
