| 跟着我国经济扶植的蓬勃成长，一方面，日趋丰硕多样的物资产物令人平易近的物资生涯需求获得了极年夜地知足，另外一方面，因为好处使令，冒充伪劣产物也充满市场，极年夜地伤害了花费者的正当权益，有关产物质量义务而提起的诉讼也接二连三。本文以平易近商法根本实际为根据，运用广泛与特别、个性与特性、普通与个体的马克思主义辩证思想办法，对中韩两国产物质量义务轨制停止了较为体系和深刻的比拟研究，在剖析二者之间的个性与特性的基本上，自创了韩国有关产物质量义务轨制的先辈的地方，提出了完美我国产物质量义务轨制的若干建议。全文共分五章。个中注释分为四章。第一章重要阐述了产物质量义务轨制的普通实际，即产物质量义务的界说、司法特点、组成要件和归责准绳等四个方面内容。起首，对产物义务和产物质量义务这两个轻易混杂的概念停止了比拟剖析，从而明白了产物义务与产物质量义务的接洽与差别。其次，韩语论文网站，对产物质量义务的司法特点、组成要件停止了阐述。最初，重点阐述了产物质量义务的归责准绳。如许，为鄙人文中对中韩两国产物质量义务轨制停止比拟打下了实际基本。产物质量义务归责准绳的改变集中表现了司法的功效由道义性的处分向功利性赔偿的改变，完成了情势公理到本质公理的司法选择。第二章重要引见了中国的产物质量义务轨制。今朝，我国还没有一部自力的产物质量义务法，韩语论文，有关产物质量义务的划定重要在产物质量法中表现。我国的产物质量义务轨制还不成熟，缺少标准性和同一性。本章重要考核了中国的产物质量义务轨制的构成与成长，产物的界说、规模、缺点，产物质量义务的伤害补偿与免责事由，和产物质量义务的诉讼时效与除斥时代等外容。第三章我们考核了韩国的产物质量义务轨制。韩国的产物质量义务轨制重要划定在制作物义务法中。本章平分别从制作物义务法的构成与成长，产物的界说、规模、缺点，产物质量义务的伤害补偿与免责事由，和产物质量义务的诉讼时效与除斥时代等外容。第四章对中韩两国有关产物质量义务轨制的内容停止了比拟，并经由过程自创韩国有关产物质量义务轨制的先辈实际的理念内容，从产物的规模与产物缺点的认定尺度，产物质量义务的伤害补偿规模与抗辩事由，产物质量义务的诉讼时效与除斥时代等三个方面提出了健全和对完美我国的产物质量义务轨制的建议，以更好地顺应国际国际情势的成长，使我国的产物质量义务轨制适应国际产物质量义务轨制成长趋向。 Abstract: Along with the rapid development of the economy of our country builds, hand, increasingly rich variety of material product is plain near the material life demand won the greatly satisfied, on the other hand, because the benefits of making, fake and inferior products is full market, greatly hurt the consumer the legitimate rights and interests, and the product quality obligation lawsuit filed also one after another. The plain near the commercial law basic theory for according to, a wide range of applications and particularly, personality and characteristics, general and individual Marxist dialectical way of thinking, to China and South Korea product quality responsibility system stopped more systematic and profound comparative study, based on the analysis between the personality and characteristics of the own ancestors of South Korea about the product quality obligation of a rail system, put forward the perfect the quality of Chinese products liability system of some suggestions. The full text is divided into five chapters. The note is divided into four chapters. The first chapter important to elaborate the general theory of product quality responsibility system, namely product quality obligation of the definition, legal characteristics, elements and imputation principle etc. four aspects. First of all, the two easily mixed product liability and product quality obligation concept were compared, so as to understand the link between product liability and product quality obligation. Secondly, the judicial characteristics, on the product quality of compulsory elements were discussed. First, expounds the imputation principle of product quality obligation. So, for our humanity in China and South Korea on the product quality liability system comparison laid the basic practical. The product quality obligation imputation principle change focused on the performance of the judicial function by moral punishment to the utilitarian compensation change, completed the situation to the essence of judicial selection axiom axiom. The second chapter introduces the important product quality responsibility system China. At present, China is still not a standalone product quality law of obligations, obligations of the delineation of the relevant product quality important performance in the "product quality law". The product quality liability system in China is not mature, the lack of standards and identity. This chapter is important to check the composition and growth of China's product quality responsibility system, product definition, scale and disadvantages, the product quality obligation of damage compensation and free defenses, and the product quality obligation of limitation of action with the exception of spending time of substandard tolerance. The third chapter we test the product quality liability system of South korea. South Korea's product quality responsibility system in the delineation of "making things an important duty in law". This chapter divide don't from the production of obligation law structure and growth, product definition, scale and disadvantages, product quality obligation of damage compensation and free defenses, and the product quality obligation of limitation of action with the exception of spending time of substandard tolerance. Chapter four deals with the content of China and South Korea about the product quality obligation of a rail system carried on the comparison, and through internally generated about the product quality obligation of a rail system in Korea advanced practical philosophy of content, from the product scale and product defects identified scale, product quality obligation of damage compensation scale and defenses, the product quality obligation of limitation of action and scheduled times three aspects puts forward suggestions to improve and to perfect our country product quality obligation of a rail system, to better conform to the growth of international and domestic situation, make our product quality obligation of rail system to adapt to international product quality responsibility system development trend. 目录: |
