| 中国自2008年8月1日起实行了反垄断法以开端规制运营者集中，并制订了详细的审查尺度。韩国比中国早于20年实行了对于独有规制及公平生意业务司法（以下简称“韩国反垄断法”）且引进美国和欧盟的轨制，韩语论文范文，修订运营者集中审查尺度，完美了之前在实务操作上存在的成绩。由此，本论文以运营者集中规制中的申报轨制、审查轨制及其抗辩轨制为重要研究规模，对中韩两国的申报轨制、审查轨制停止比拟研究，据此为将来中国的运营者集中相干立法及法学范畴供给思绪和参考价值。分离比拟中韩两国的运营者集中的审查责任人、申报措施、申报责任宽免和违背申报责任的司法效果，审查要件、审查尺度和本质审查抗辩等外容，参照韩国的运营者集中规制轨制，引出中国轨制中所存在的不完美的地方，并对此提出公道的建议。在运营者集中审查轨制中最焦点的是，当实行运营者集中时，发生的限制竞争后果与该项集中给市场与社会带来的效益之间的利害衡量，若何准确掌握。该制止哪些运营者集中，该许可哪些集中的断定与否，对此，今朝列国愈来愈偏向于以限制竞争为尺度的一体化。今朝，韩语论文，中国对考量运营者集中审查尺度作出了笼统的划定，其尺度的审查要件是参照列国的轨制，在其事例的基本上详细化了。别的中国做出了以具有竞争后果或许相符社会公共好处为重要断定能否予以宽免的划定，但这有需要将其规模及要件的明白化，并制订可猜测的尺度。在运营者集中规制轨制上，中国与晚期制订实行其轨制的国度，根本类似，然则，斟酌列国所处的政治、汗青、经济、地舆等配景与经济成长程度分歧，须要斟酌中国经济、政策方面等特别身分以免将来中国试图自创他国的经历时，因不服水土而给市场竞争带来的晦气作用，伤害花费者的好处和社会好处。中国的运营者集中规制轨制，应往增进公民经济和进步花费者福利的偏向去调剂，并树立安康、有用的市场竞争机制。 Abstract: China since August 1, 2008, implement the anti-monopoly law "to start regulation operators focus, and to develop a detailed review of the scale. South Korea than China early in 20 years to implement the "a unique regulation and fair business law (hereinafter referred to as the" anti monopoly law in South Korea ") and the introduction of the rail system in the United States and the European Union, the revision operator centralized review scale and perfect before in the practical operation of the existing results. Thus, the operators to concentrated in the regulation of declaration rail system, censorship and the defense system is an important research scale, to China and South Korea declare rail system, censorship of stop comparative study. Based on this, for the future Chinese operators focus coherent legislation and legal domain to offer thoughts and reference value. Separation compared operators of China and South Korea focused on the responsibility for review and reporting methods, reporting responsibilities relief and contrary to the declaration of the judicial effect of responsibility and review requirements, the review of the scale and nature of the review defense external content, according to South Korea's operators, centralized regulation system, leads to the rail system in China is not perfect, and puts forward the reasonable suggestions. The operators of censorship in the focus is, when operators in a centralized way, measure of restricting competition consequences and the focus to the market and social benefit between interests, how to accurately grasp. The stop which operators, the license which concentrated assertive and not. In this regard, current nations become more and more biased to restrict competition, as the scale of integration. China today to consider operators focused review scale made a general designation, its scale review requirements is referring to the rail of the nations, in the case of details. The other Chinese made at competitive social public benefits to match the outcome may determine whether to delineate important relief, but it will need to understand the scale and the elements, and to develop that scale. In operators on rail regulation system, China and advanced formulation implementation of the rail of the country, were similar, however, consider the nations the politics, history, economy, geography, etc. background and economic development level is different, need to consider China's economic and policy aspects such as special status so as to avoid future China is trying to own his country's experience, because of not acclimatized to harmful effects brought by market competition, hurt consumers benefits and social benefits. Chinese operators of centralized regulation system, should be to promote the national economy and the progress of cost benefits of bias to adjust, and to foster a healthy and useful market competition mechanism. 目录: |
