| （摘要内容经过系统自动伪原创处理以避免复制，下载原文正常，内容请直接查看目录。） 纯洁经济丧失是一个比拟法上的概念，跟着市场经济的赓续成长而逐步惹起人们的存眷，在年夜陆法系和英美法系国度都有比拟深刻的研究。因为我国市场经济起步较晚，成长还不完美，今朝国际学界对于此成绩的研究还处于低级阶段。本文拟自创对我国作用颇深的德公法，德语专业论文，以德国形式为参考，容身于现行法，商量我公法学框架内纯洁经济丧失成绩的掩护形式。本文共分为六个部门。第一部门是对于纯洁经济丧失的概述，重要从其概念界定、特点及类型三个方面停止阐释，进一步厘清纯洁经济丧失概念的内在及内涵，从而对纯洁经济丧失停止界定。第二部门重点引见了德国侵权法的普通救援和特殊办法的采取两个方面的内容，经由过程对德国形式下对于纯洁经济丧失成绩救援的研究，为我国对于纯洁经济丧失的救援供给名贵的自创意义。第三部门起首梳理了今朝我国现行法上对于纯洁经济丧失掩护的司法标准，然后罗列了司法理论中的典范案例，以对我国今朝对于该成绩的掩护有一个年夜致的熟悉。第四部门重要阐述了纯洁经济丧失掩护的实际基本，即以权力与好处辨别掩护为条件，详细又从德公法上的权力与好处辨别实际和我国对纯洁经济丧失经由过程“好处”掩护的可行性两个方面停止论证。第五部门则设专章引见和剖析了在我国对于纯洁经济丧失限缩掩护的考量身分，德语毕业论文，以完成在我国现行法上掩护纯洁经济丧失的同时统筹人们行动自在之两重价值。第六部门为本文的最初一部门，在后面阐述的基本上提出我国处置纯洁经济丧失成绩的建议，以期经由过程四条理掩护形式的构建完成在我国对于纯洁经济丧失限缩掩护之目标。 Abstract: Pure economic loss is a comparative concept of law, along with the ceaseless development of the market economy and gradually aroused people's concern, in the continental law system and Anglo American law system countries have relatively deep discussion. Because of the market economy in our country started late, development is not perfect, the international academic research present on this achievement is still at the lower stage. This paper intended to create their own deeply influence to our country of Germany, in the form of Germany for reference, shelter in the existing law, I discuss the public law within the framework of pure economic loss results cover form. This paper is divided into six departments. First part is about the overview of pure economic loss, the important from the definition of the concept, types and characteristics of the three aspects of stop interpretation, further clarify the pure economic loss of the concept of intrinsic and connotation, and the pure economic loss of definition. The second part focuses on the introduction of German tort law general rescue and special way of take two aspects of content, through the process of Germany form about pure economic loss of research achievements of the rescue, for our country about pure economic loss of relief supplies valuable reference. The third sector chapeau combing the currently our current law about pure economic loss cover standards of justice and list the classic case of judicial practice, to have a cause of the eve of the familiar to cover our current on the results. The fourth part is important expounded on pure economic loss of the cover of the actual, which means that we to distinguish the power and benefits cover condition, is in detail from the German public power and benefit to identify actual and our country of pure economic loss through the process of "good" cover the feasibility argumentation stop. The Fifth Department is located in chapter introduces and analyzes in our country about pure economic loss limit considerations of shrinking cover identity to complete in our current law cover of pure economic loss and co-ordinate the movement of people and comfortable double value. The sixth part for the first part, elaborated in the back basically put forward the disposal of the pure economic loss results suggested, to through process organized cover form construction completed in our country about the pure economic loss of the shrinkage limit cover of target. 目录: 中文摘要 4-5 Abstract 5-6 前言 9-10 一、纯粹经济损失概述 10-15 （一）纯粹经济损失的概念界定 10-12 1．纯粹经济损失的概念 10-11 2．纯粹经济损失与相关概念的区别 11-12 （二）纯粹经济损失的特征 12-13 （三）纯粹经济损失的类型 13-15 1．反射损失 13 2．转移损失 13-14 3．因公共场所、运输通道和公用设施关闭造成的损失 14 4．基于对特定信息披露内容的信赖而发生的损失 14 5．因对专业服务或建议的信赖而发生的损失 14-15 二、德国模式下关于纯粹经济损失问题的处理 15-22 （一）德国侵权法的一般处理模式 15-18 1．《德国民法典》第 823 条第 1 款 15-16 2.《德国民法典》第 823 条第 2 款 16-17 3.《德国民法典》第 826 条 17-18 （二）特别方法的采用 18-22 1．利益的权利化 18-20 2．契约责任的扩张 20-22 三、我国纯粹经济损失的保护近况 22-27 （一）我国的立法近况 22-24 1.《民法通则》的相关规定 22-23 2.《侵权责任法》的相关规定 23 3．其他法学法规、司法解释的规定 23-24 （二）我国的司法实践 24-27 1．重庆电缆案 25 2．《山西日报》巨额赔偿案 25-26 3．王保富诉三信律师事务所财产损害赔偿纠纷案 26-27 四、纯粹经济损失保护的理论基础：权利与利益区分保护 27-33 （一）德国法上的权利与利益区分理论 27-28 （二）我国对纯粹经济损失通过“利益”保护的可行性 28-33 1．我国权益区分理论的司法运用 29-30 2．借鉴德国法，解释适用《侵权责任法》一般条款 30-33 五、纯粹经济损失限缩保护的政策考量因素 33-37 （一）行为自由的保护 33-34 （二）避免诉讼泛滥 34 （三）避免加害人承担过重的责任 34-35 （四）社会应忍受之事 35-37 六、我国纯粹经济损失保护模式的建议思路 37-42 （一）第一层次：其他法学有特别规定的，依照其规定 37-38 （二）第二层次：因过错违反保护他人之法学，致人损害 38 （三）第三层次：故意违背善良风俗致人损害 38-39 （四）第四层次：因过失引起的纯粹经济损失之救济 39-42 结语 42-43 参考文献 43-47 |
