This analyzes the factors that delayed defense R&D on military air platform in South Korea, which should have been carried out precedently, based on the phenomena that R&D on air-guided weapons has not been sufficient in South Korea. Thr... This analyzes the factors that delayed defense R&D on military air platform in South Korea, which should have been carried out precedently, based on the phenomena that R&D on air-guided weapons has not been sufficient in South Korea. Through this analysis, this looks over what these factors are and how much they influence policy decision on defense R&D on military air platform. And applying these to the analytic variables and model that reflects and recomposes several theories like Wilson's bureaucratic organization theory on the basis of G. Allison's policy decision models, this looks into the types of policy decision on defense R&D on military air platform in South Korea. First, to confirm if R&D on air-guided weapons has been really insufficient in South Korea, this looks into the examples of domestic and foreign R&D on air-guided weapons. As a result, it is confirmed that at the practical level, there is no air-guided weapons developed in South Korea until now. Second, this checks if air-guided weapons can be compared with land and sea-guided weapons in a view of guided weapons. Compared with land and sea-guided weapons, it is identified that air-guided weapons have no distinctive characteristics in a view of necessity of R&D, quantities of needs, cost of R&D and production, level of technologies, structure of system, interoperability of system, and level of awareness on system. By the way, to look into the reason from another point of view why R&D on air-guided weapons has been insufficient, this takes a close look at the current status of guided weapons that have been developed and operated in South Korea. From this, it is found that at the practical level, there is no air-guided weapon and military air platform(namely, main fighter) developed independently in South Korea until now. Based on this analysis, it is deduced that the reason why R&D on air-guided weapons has been insufficient in South Korea, compared with land and sea-guided weapons, is that there is no military air platform that has been developed independently in South Korea. To confirm this deduction, this looks into the current status of R&D on guided weapons and related military platforms that have been developed in South Korea, by relating each others according to the passage of time from 1970s. As a result, it is confirmed that R&D on military land, sea, and air platforms in South Korea has a high tendency leading R&D on guided weapons which are loaded and operated in related military platforms, and then R&D on related military platforms that loads and operates guided weapons should be necessarily preceded to boost R&D on guided weapons. Based on this analysis, this examines the factors on defense industry's and military organization's aspect that has delayed R&D on military air platform that should have been carried out precedently to boost R&D on air-guided weapons in South Korea. From this, it is analyzed as a factor on defense industry's aspect that the airline industry, which can become a base of air platform for military purpose, has not been raised appropriately in South Korea. And the decision making by the structure of monopolistic position inside the organization(the structure of army-centric decision making), the dependence on the outside organization possessing the technological superiority(high dependence on the U.S. military force, especially on the force of the U.S. Navy and Air Force), and the influence of external environment on decision making of the organization(the preferential consideration of foreign buying caused by the confrontation with North Korea) are analyzed as the factors on military organization's aspect. Applying the analyses on these factors to the analytic variables and model that reflects and recomposes several theories like Wilson's bureaucratic organization theory on the basis of G. Allison's policy decision models, this looks into the types of policy decision on defense R&D on military air platform in South Korea. As a result, it is recognized that for the factor on defense industry's aspect, a type of policy making of 'Rational Behave' and a type of policy making of 'Organizational Behave' appears on a similar level, but for the factors on military organization's aspect, a type of policy making of 'Organizational Behave' appears much more than a type of policy making of 'Rational Behave'. And this additionally reflects the influences of each factors into these analyses and synthetically looks into a type of decision making that delayed defense R&D on military air platform in South Korea. As a result, it is deduced that the decision making was influenced much more by the structure of decision making of military organization rather than the rational decision of a nation. Finally, this considers policy measure to boost R&D on military air platform in South Korea. As a result, the transition into the paradigm which recognizes the foreign market as the main market of defense industry is required to expand the scales of defense industry and secure the long-term and sustainable market demand. And it is also needed that each member of the Army, the Navy, and the Air Force of South Korea should be appointed as the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff one after another, as a balanced alternative to improve the structure of army-centric decision making inside the military organization of South Korea. ，免费韩语论文，韩语论文范文 |
