This thesis focused on the development of national crisis management systems by adopting organizational learning and hazard factor theories with a comparative method to feature the crisis management of South Korea and China illustrated by two cases of... This thesis focused on the development of national crisis management systems by adopting organizational learning and hazard factor theories with a comparative method to feature the crisis management of South Korea and China illustrated by two cases of disaster. With increasing frequencies and strength of the natural as well as human-error disasters, safety needs and concerns in a national level have been increased. And it is necessary that more systematic and effective crisis management systems have urgently required. The South Korea(here-in-after, called Korea) and China have tried to prevent various disasters. And both countries have seriously developed crisis management system such as the legislations of ‘Misfortune and the Safety Supervision Basic Law,’ ‘The Law of the People's Republic of China on Response to Emergencies.’ And National Emergency Management Agency was founded for minimizing disaster-related damages. The purpose of this thesis is presenting the strategy of learning organization and the causes of policy failures by illustrated the learning organization of crisis management. For achieving this research goal, this thesis used the analytical method of documentary records and literatures. In addition, case analysis and in-depth interview technique to practitioners and experts of crisis management organization were conducted. Based on the comparative perspective, this thesis critically analyzed South Korean ‘Sewol Ferry Disaster,’ on April 16th, 2014 and China ‘Eastern Star Cruise Ship’ disaster on June 1st, 2015. First of all, some common reasons for blame of these two disasters can be listed as such. First, the Sewol Ferry and the Eastern Star Cruise Ship were the greatest disaster in terms of human lives loss as representative cases exposed by the failure for learning organization in response to process of artificial(human-error) disaster frequently developed in our society. By viewing this case analysis, it is learned for prevention and response-activity about crisis management organization in terms of learning organization. Second, in the cases of the Sewol Ferry and the Eastern Star Cruise Ship disasters, we can find the commonalities and differences of crisis management between the two countries. After the Sewol Ferry disaster, establishment of responsible organization about crisis management was suggested and founded. Thus, the Ministry of Public Safety and Security organized to respond and tackle down the problems for response abilities and controlling systems of disaster management in Korea. This thesis searched and made a typological list as natural hazard, human-made or –error hazard, manage & technology hazard, social hazard. And the five hazardous factors such as cause of accident, shared vision, leadership, system thinking, mental models and knowledge management applied for learning organization to present effective crisis management system. Firstly, in terms of build shared vision for safety, an indispensable lesson in our society is to stand value of recognizing safety-first as the flag-ship ideology in a long term. Our society must give more priorities to social and national rationality by accommodating this safety value rather than just economic rationality. Secondly, it is learning the systematization and overcoming the mechanism in failure of learning organization. Crisis management organization focuses the total-insight deviating strategy from illiberal sight by just need-based system speculation. It is believed to the organizational learning factors of practical capability, dynamic considerations on the emerging perspectives rather than the linear and/or static thinking. Also the educational system of disaster and its effective management techniques and methodologies need to change for overcoming the human-related mistakes and moral hazards. Thirdly, it requires some activating knowledge management of crisis management organization. To activate knowledge management of disaster management organization, it is needed to reform the succession system of affairs for knowledge share, to reshuffle the operational devices and responsible organization, and to plan the system of estimation and compensation. Furthermore, it recognizes the value of knowledge management in the crisis management organization. As for the further researches on the disaster and its management by the comparative method, this thesis is limited to discover the human-error and related factors for explaining the disasters experienced in both Korea and China. Also this thesis has a weak point on the cross-sectional analysis of the two cases of disasters by focusing on the prevention policy and its legislations. ，韩语论文题目，韩语论文题目 |
