This study revealed the timeliness to create the prototype for restoration of architectural form of Baekje and the necessity of study to support this. In addition, with the purpose of specifying the architectural form, it interpreted the correlationsh... This study revealed the timeliness to create the prototype for restoration of architectural form of Baekje and the necessity of study to support this. In addition, with the purpose of specifying the architectural form, it interpreted the correlationship between ‘Separate Planes’ and ‘Chuan-Dou Framing System’ with regard to the archaeological characteristics of Baekje which could be summarized as ‘Wall with Inner Column’ and ‘Archaeological Site of Building with Inner Wall’. On the basis of this, it suggested the prototype of Baekje Architecture. As the background of driving the purpose of this study, the sectionⅠ indicated the issues in the laws and systems relating to historical cultural environment and the designation of World Cultural heritage. Furthermore, the need of the continuous research on the architectural forms of Baekje was insisted in the historic·cultural·economical aspects. Regarding this, it showed the foundations to underpin the critical mind which was depicted in the part of the aim of this study and described the methodology to organize the materials. The hypothetical proposition, ‘Separate Planes’ and ‘Chuan-Dou Framing System’, was formulated and each thesis was proposed and approved to examine the adjustment of this hypothesis. In section Ⅱ, it revealed the needs of the times in interpreting and representing the architectural form of Baekje in order to create it as a symbol. This study put the critical focus in figuring out the correlationship between ‘Separate Planes’ and ‘Chuan-Dou Framing System’ among Baekje architectural forms which had not remained. It is to find a methodology returning the subject outside existential context to the present through the architectural tool, which could have limits in adjusting the current domestic historical cultural environment. However, there is continuous demands of the times in enlarging the range of meaning of historical cultural environment. It was a trend which could be discovered in the issues of the designation of Baekje Historic Areas(Unesco Wold Cultural Heritage Sites) and ancient-city districts of Baekje era. Especially, the announcement of the standard of Hanok was understanded as a initiative for the acception of traditional architecture which had been defined as Hanok or architectural form of Hanok in the central and local government, and the significance of operating the standard was explained. In this purpose, this section expressed the timeliness to interpret and create the Baekje architectural form in respects of studying history as well as responding to the practical demands. In section Ⅲ, it judged the theoretical matching between ‘Separate Planes’ and ‘Chuan-Dou Framing System’. As to ‘Separate Planes’, it reviewed preceding studies which had been conducted in the name of ‘Separate Hipped-and-Gable Roof’ or ‘Shilorobuki’, ‘Ban-Woo’around East Asian regions. However, these studies had been carried out mainly with the achievement of archaeological excavations, so that there was lack of approach to the building technology of the time. Thus, in order to complement the limit, the hypothetical proposition, deliberately linking ‘Separate Planes’ to ‘Chuan-Dou Framing System’, was established and then figured out the extent of matching of these features. In this process, Baekje Landscape Design Tile(Mountain-Water Scenery Sculptural Tile)·Tamamushi no zushi·the changes of Japanese architectural technology from Nara to Kamakura era·Chuan-Dou framing system and earth and timber structure framing system·Wall with inner column and method of plan composition in archaeological sites of building with inner wall were analyzed. The result of section Ⅲ was summarized to five conclusions as below. First, it is needed to expand the use of term, ‘Separate Hipped-and-Gable Roof’, to ‘Separate Planes’. Second, there is no reason for ‘Separate Planes’ to ‘Chuan-Dou Framing System’ to inevitably coexist, but it was presumed that multi-rooms in one house structure has affinity with ‘Chuan-Dou Framing System’. Third, it was indicated that as a form of Baekje architecture there existed dual-structure plan that adjunct structure is separated from main structure. Forth, there is a possibility that ‘Separate Planes’ did not contain earthen supplement and the finishing material of roof was not certainly ceramic tile. Fifth, the type of ‘Separate Planes’could be subdivided depending on the size and use of architecture. According to these results, ‘Separate planes’ showed the relevance to ‘Chuan-Dou Framing System’, but it needs to be occasionally understanded as a form with expandability of roof structure and shape. In section Ⅳ, prototypes were suggested on the basis of analysis in section Ⅲ. In this proposition, the part of ‘Separate Planes’ on which each roof surface is splitted or connected was named as ‘Line of Separated Planes’. The prototypes were classified in the focus of relevance between the element of roof in ‘Separate Planes’ and inner structure. There are two type classifications according to ‘Line of Separated Planes’. First, in the case where ‘Line of Separated Planes’ is placed on the upper part of exterior column, the structure needs to be stabilized through Tai Liang structure or extra structural member. The second type is the case where ‘Line of Separated Planes’ is functioned in relation to other structural member inside architecture rather than exterior column. In this occasion, it was identified that inner structure is not associated with the form of roof. Such types indicated that dual-plan structure, which is identified as a distinct feature of ‘Archaeological Site of Building with Inner Wall’, are interrelated with upper structure. It maintained the necessity of embracing the concept of architectural structure, that main structure and adjunct structure are separated, as Baekje architectural form, and suggested the prototype on composition method and proper materials. Section Ⅴis the conclusion part, organizing the results of this study. The detailed conclusion was described in the section Ⅲ and Ⅳ, so that in this section the general result, derived through hypothetical-deductive method of architectural history study(proposed in section Ⅱ), was depicted. The result implies that deducive history reasoning is needed so as to continuously complement alternate models of Baekje architectural form suggested in this study. The prototype drawn in this process was represented by design method, confirming that the interpreted result of correlationship between ‘Separate Planes’ and ‘Chuan-Dou Framing System’ is accepted as a historical context and it is able to be used for the ground to infer Baekje architectural form.
|
