In progress of modernization, excavation investigations was happened by a lot of public works, so, there were many excavation investigations, and it was not enough time to research excavation investigations. Therefore, archeologists didn’t consider ... In progress of modernization, excavation investigations was happened by a lot of public works, so, there were many excavation investigations, and it was not enough time to research excavation investigations. Therefore, archeologists didn’t consider cultural assets important at that time. Because of this reason, most of cultural assets were destroyed. Moreover, remnants also were in an exhausted condition and thrown out. Real state is that government could not appropriate enough budgets for maintenance and restoration, and application plan for cultural assets is also marginal. People are lack of attention about excavation investigations, and they consider excavation investigations destruction. Naturally excavation investigation is accompanied with destruction, but destruction in excavation doesn’t mean damage. After excavating investigation with destruction, cultural assets were thrown out without maintenance and restoration. That incurs the enmity of the people, and makes people to think negative realization about excavation. Accordingly, archeologists should make an effort to improve people’s negative realization. I will grasp current problem from outside view, and analyze epistemic state through question investigation. After inspection of current situation, I suggest way of application in future. Several ruins are preserved by value being recognized. At that time, ruins are divided into two parts which is under nation or city. Some ruins are not belonged to anywhere. They are not different. Conserved form of ruins is two part of preservation. First way is preserving all of ruins or part of ruins with the original form in actual locality. Second way is restoring all or part of ruins near place and museum. Until February, 2014, 532 ruins were preserved according to counting. Objects of investigation are total 10 places including 4 ruins listed as USCO. Through these ruins of object, we can know that only few runs are managed and utilized in present. Most of ruins can’t be managed. That mean is policy for way of public relations and application is not enough for most of ruins. So, I look for public relations, making application, and field experience for way of cultural assets application, and also way of system maintenance is vitalization supervision system, way of securing budget for preserving cultural assets, legalization for installing sign board to notice information. Destroying cultural assets is like making history to fall in maze by a broad interpretation, but excavation and development have been relation of conflict, and many people consider history stuffy, can’t make enough money. Besides, they think excavation investigation is destruction. In fact, after excavating, application of cultural assets is negative situation. Many of ruins are left out and forgotten, but we should not make that situation to be happened anymore. In future, cultural assets are new resource to create demand for human resources, economic mean, and also it can be great tourist industry with way of realistic application. Recognition improvement of the general public is not only my purpose, but also start point for real application of cultural assets. ，韩语论文，韩语论文 |
