Recently, the Korean movie world has caught the faction film. People usually are fascinated by faction film, which added cinematic fiction by using part of historical facts more easily, than films which reenact historical researches faithfully. The mo... Recently, the Korean movie world has caught the faction film. People usually are fascinated by faction film, which added cinematic fiction by using part of historical facts more easily, than films which reenact historical researches faithfully. The movie, <Gwanghae: The Man Who Became King>, which was released in 2013, caused Gwanghaegun syndrome by drawing audiences totaling 12,320,000 people and it provided fodder to review the history of Gwanghaegun through TV dramas such as <The Face of the King> and <Hwajeong> etc. Otherwise, <Roaring Currents> of movie director Kim, Han Min which was released in 2014 drew audiences totaling 17,600,000 people and topped the box office in Korea. Not only two films, but also the historical movies set in Joseon such as <KUNDO: Age of the Rampant>, <Pirates: Bandits Who Went to the Sea>, <The Fatal Encounter>, <The Insinuative Retainer>, <The Throne> etc were produced continuously. Then what is the reason to produce these 'historical movies' in Korean movie market recently and the crowd were enthusiastic about the 'historical movies'? It is interesting to bring out this question, for the number of the historical movies which were released during ten years of Progressive Regime of president Kim, Dae Jung and Roh, Mu Hyeon was only eight but the number of the historical movies was as many as 28. In addition, movies set in Joseon such as <Doriwhaga>, <Magician in Joseon>, <The Big Tiger, Daeho>, <Gosanja, Daedongyeojido> etc would be produced and released consistently from now on. As for the reason of increasing movies set in Joseon every year by entering the conservative government, is it simply because the attempts of Korean movie world to promote diversity of movies? Nonetheless, what is the reason that Joseon was chosen as the background of all the many historical periods? A refutation of choosing Joseon due to lots of historical materials, but it cannot be an ultimate answer to this question. The history of Joseon itself for about five hundred years would be a material to arouse interests of the crowd but it is the results of interaction of multiple factors by interlacing numerous variables periodically, culturally and economically for the movie industry implies political strategy necessarily. Usually the public tries to satisfy their desires which are impossible in the reality through movies. However, it is required to pay attention to the fact that the ruling ideology is melted in the public movies. The public movies are produced due to power block which can control capital and policy and their ideology has been melted all the time. They make movies for the public but the strategies were connoted to reinforce discourse of power block in the movies all the time. Especially, Korean’s own the special political ideology was established as a political instrument to form advantageous discourses for their government to the audiences who consume movies. It is examined the changes of ruling ideology appeared in the movies by following the trends of movies appeared whenever the governments change. The government of Kim, Dae-jung and Roh, Moo-hyun presented peaceful policy toward North Korea as an agenda. Movies released in this period such as<Joint Security Area>, <Welcome to Dongmakgol> etc matched with the code of peaceful policy toward North Korea excellently and were box office hits. The favorable atmosphere toward North Korea formed in the real-politic matched with the code of nationalism in the movies excellently and presented a new perspective toward the relationship with North Korea to the public. Likewise, Joseon in the historical movies which are made like a trend by the governments of Lee, Myung-bak and Park, Geun-hye has the same way of functions of fantastic space formed in <Joint Security Area>, <Welcome To Dongmakgol>. That is, the historical movies present audiences impossible fantasy in the real-politic by borrowing historical materials and spaces. The historical movies can distribute the ruling ideology cleverly and relatively compared to movies about division to the public. Consequently, the movies about division of the progressive governments which showed the relationship with North Korea fantastically or the historical movies of the conservative government which filled the lacked desires in this period through periodical background of Joseon are used as political instruments to reinforce the discourse of the ruling class. Discussions about political message implied in the movies about division were suggested in lots of s and books already. However, relatively, there are not so many people who pay attention to the historical movies of the governments of Lee, Myung-bak and Park, Geun-hye. As for the reason, the dominant discourses implied in the historical movies of the conservative governments would be different with the progressive government and hidden in the genre of the movies more cleverly. The purpose of this thesis is to research how the conservative government send ruling ideology to the public by using the periodical background of Joseon through analysis of three movies. All of these three movies were set in Joseon in the conservative government and made headlines before the openings. Three movies connoted different political implication and this thesis considers this would be a significant variable to be a box office hit. In addition, through these movies, it was used movie reviews and comments of the public and interviews and news articles to compare how the public accept these movies and how the politicians use. As for the comparison on discourses between power block and the public, the conflicts between two groups would be examined by the production and acceptance or domination and resistance appeared through the popular culture of the movie. Through this, it would be the purpose to examine how the movie would work as a field of discourses to suture the conflict of two groups and influences of movies on the society. ，免费韩语论文，韩语论文题目 |
