| 改造开放以来，跟着中国经济的疾速成长，中国与世界列国的交换也日趋活泼，是以，汉语进修者逐步增长，愈来愈多的国际外学者开端存眷对外汉语教授教养。许多学者赓续地研究出新的实际、揭橥新的论文。固然古代汉语与古代韩语对时态方面研究的时光其实不长，然则近年来，跟着学者们对于汉语与韩语间的关系的研究赓续的深刻，研究范畴的赓续扩展对于汉语和韩语间的否认词用法的比拟也开端多了起来。这里有两个语句“不克不及做”和”做不完”。假如想用韩语说明这两个语句，二者均酿成“”。假如这两个语句都成为完全的句子，那末其说明会有分歧，然则对句子自己的说明会是雷同的。其来由究竟甚么？来由在于两个说话上表现时态的语素纷歧致。笔者从这个成绩开端研究时态。本文重要研究对象是韩语时态、汉语时态、两个说话否认格局的时态、补贴动词“一/”与能够补语的时态比较剖析。本文共分为六部门，包含注释四章，另加引言和结语"第一部门引言，重要解释研究配景、研究对象、研究办法和语料起源。第二部门，经由过程语料库中的例句解释韩语否认词””语义、否认词””语义、与汉语否认词“不”和“没”语义，停止韩语与汉语否认词的时态比较。第三部门，经由过程语料库中的例句解释韩语补贴动词“一/”、“一”、“一”语义与汉语能够补语语义，停止韩语补贴动词“一/”、“一”、“一”与汉语能够补语的时态比较。第四部门，停止韩语与汉语时态比较、缘由剖析。第五部门(结语)，韩语论文题目，总结全文，归纳综合本文的结论并指出尚存在的成绩。 Abstract: Since the reform and opening up, along with the Chinese economy's rapid growth, the exchange of China and the nations of the world is becoming more and more lively is, learning Chinese is increasing gradually, an increasing number of domestic and foreign scholars start deposit dependents of Chinese as a foreign language teaching. Many scholars continue to study new practice, reveal new . Although ancient Chinese and Korean on the temporal aspects of research time actually not long. However in recent years, followed by scholars of Chinese and Korean relationship research is continuously deep, in the research field of gengxu expansion of Chinese and Korean denied the usage of analogy also end up. There are two statements "can't do" and "do not end". If you want to explain the two sentences in Korean, both of the two lead"". If these two statements have become a complete sentence, then it will have differences, but is similar to sentence his explanation. The source of what? The reason lies in two words on the tense morpheme is inconsistent. From the start to study temporal performance. In this , an important research object is Chinese, Korean tense tense, two to deny pattern of tense, the verb "/" subsidies and can complement the temporal comparative analysis. This is divided into six departments, including the notes of four chapters, plus the introduction and the conclusion of "the first part is the introduction, explains the research background, the important research object, research methods and data origin. The second department, through the process of corpus. Explain Korean deny the word "semantic deny the word" semantic and Chinese deny the word "no" and "not" semantic, stop Korean and Chinese deny the tense of the word comparison. The third sector, through the process of corpus. Explain Korean subsidy verb "/", "a", "a" semantic and Chinese can complement semantics, stop subsidies verbs in Korean "/", "a", "a" and Chinese can complement the tense comparison. The fourth sector, stop the Korean and Chinese tense, comparison analysis. The fifth sector (conclusion), summarized, summed up the conclusion of this and points out the existing achievement. 目录: 摘要 4-5 Abstract 5 引言 8-10 （一） 探讨背景 8 （二） 探讨对象 8 （三） 探讨措施 8-9 （四） 语料来源 9-10 一、 时态探讨综述 10-16 （一） 韩语时态探讨综述 10-11 （二） 汉语时态探讨综述 11-13 （三） 韩语汉语时态对比探讨综述 13-16 二、 韩语汉语否定格式时态对比探讨 16-30 （一） 否定格式略论 16-19 1. 韩语否定格式略论 16-17 2. 汉语否定格式略论 17-18 3. 韩语汉语否定格式对比略论 18-19 （二） 韩语否定词“”与汉语否定词“不”对比 19-24 1. 韩语否定词“”语义略论 19-20 2. 汉语否定词“不”语义略论 20-22 3. 韩语否定词“ ”与汉语否定词“不”对比略论 22-24 （三） 韩语否定词“ ”与汉语否定词“没”对比 24-30 1. 韩语否定词“”语义略论 24-26 2. 否定词“没”语义略论 26-27 3. 韩语否定词“”与汉语否定词“没”对比略论 27-30 三、 韩语补助动词和汉语可能补语对比探讨 30-43 （一） 韩语补助动词略论 30-36 1. 韩语补助动词“- / ”语义略论 30-32 2. 韩语补助动词“- ”语义略论 32-34 3. 韩语补助动词“- ”语义略论 34-36 （二） 汉语可能补语语义略论 36-37 （三） 韩语补助动词与汉语可能补语对比略论 37-43 1. 韩语补助动词“- / ”和汉语可能补语时态对比略论 37-40 2. 韩语补助动词“- ”汉语可能补语时态对比略论 40-41 3. 韩语补助动词“- ”汉语可能补语时态对比略论 41-43 四、 汉语与韩语否定时态同异原因略论 43-46 五、 结语 46-47 参考文献 47-49 后记 49 |
