| 今朝语法律界对古代汉语疑问句的研究曾经获得了很多研究结果，个中包含对疑问句中疑问词的研究。虽然如斯，韩语论文网站，在这些已有研究结果中，平常生涯中罕见的古代汉语疑问词“怎样”的研究却其实不罕见。固然邵敬敏等学者在研究古代汉语疑问词的时刻提到过“怎样”，然则对于留先生来讲仅靠这些研究照样不克不及够让人满足。据我们所懂得，古代汉语疑问词“怎样”，可以剖析为疑问用法、非疑问用法和反问用法三种。疑问用法又重要分为讯问措施和讯问缘由，除此以外，疑问用法还有存在于直接问句中的情形。依据我们的考核，直接问句有三种分歧的格局：“怎样……都/也……”格局、“不管/不论/随/随意/任/听凭……怎样……”格局、“不管/不论……怎样……都/也/总/老是／还……”格局。“怎样”除疑问用法以外，还有非疑问用法，而且非疑问用法并不是是有时的语法景象。据统计，韩语毕业论文，在500万字的古代汉语语估中，运用“怎样”的实例有三千多条，个中65%的句子是不负载疑问信息的情形。既然非疑问用法运用如斯普遍，那末疑问用法与非疑问用法都异样值得看重。本文以为非疑问用法可以分为不定代词用法和回指用法，个中不定代词用法又可以分为与“不知”、“不晓得”、“不知道”等连用和与“想”等心思动词连用的两种用法。接上去我们考核了古代汉语疑问词“怎样”的反问用法。反问用法可以分为：“(条件句)，怎样/能愿动词/VP”格局、“VP”和“(条件句)，怎样/VP”格局、“(条件句)，怎样/副词/VP”格局、“(条件句)，怎样/这么/如许/VP”格局。疑问用法、非疑问用法和反问用法这三种分歧用法的“怎样”在平常用语中都异常罕见，本文经由过程综述后人的研究结果和对疑问词“怎样”的分类，对平常用语中的罕见例句停止详细剖析，从新总结出了“怎样”的语法特色。本文最初还把古代汉语疑问词“怎样”在韩语中的表达措施停止了剖析，从而得出了它们之间的差异。在剖析进程中，我们重要分两步停止。第一步以韩国最为经常使用的高丽年夜学平易近族文明研究院的中韩辞书为依托，剖析出韩语傍边运用古代汉语疑问词“怎样”的办法。第二步以第二章到第四章中所研究出的古代汉语疑问词“怎样”的语法特色为重要研究对象，剖析出这些用法的“怎样”翻译成韩语后会发生的表达措施，然后与中韩辞书中的“怎样”停止比较。从中我们发明了中韩辞书中五种不存在的表达措施：“(？)”、(？)(？)”。经由过程如许的比较剖析，更凸起了汉语疑问词“怎样”的特色。愿望我们的研究对进修或研究古代汉语疑问词“怎样”的成绩可以或许有所赞助。 Abstract: The current grammar learning circles the interrogative sentences in the study of ancient Chinese has been a lot of research results, including study of interrogative interrogative words in. Although the predicament, in the existing research results, the usual career rare ancient Chinese interrogative words "how" the research is actually not rare. Although Shao Jingmin scholars in the study of ancient Chinese interrogative words time mentioned the "how", however, stay on the first born speak alone these studies still cannot enough to satisfy. As far as we know, ancient Chinese interrogative words "how, we can analyze the interrogative and non interrogative usages and the rhetorical usage three. Interrogative usages and important method and reason of interrogation, in addition, interrogative usage still to direct questions. According to our assessment, there are three different questions: "what kind of pattern directly...... All / also......" "No matter whether the pattern, with / / / casual / task / at...... How......" Pattern, "regardless of...... How...... All / also / always / always / also......" Pattern. "How" in addition to interrogative usage, and non interrogative usages, and non interrogative usage is not sometimes grammar scene. According to statistics, in 500 words of ancient Chinese language assessment and application of "how" instance has more than 3000 bar, medium and 65% of the sentences is not load the interrogative information. Since the non interrogative usage of application so common, then doubt usage and non interrogative usage are also worth attention. This thesis thinks that non interrogative usage can be divided into indefinite pronouns and anaphora usage, medium of adventitious pronoun usage can be divided into "do not know", "don't know", "do not know" used in conjunction with "think" and other psychological verbs with two usage. Then we examine the question of "how" in ancient Chinese. Rhetorical usage can be divided into: "(conditional) how / wish verb / VP" structure, "VP" and "(conditional), how you / VP" structure, "(conditional), how / Adverb / VP" structure, "(conditional) how / so / such / VP" pattern. Interrogative usages and non use of questions and ask the three different usage of "how" in ordinary language are very rare, this paper through the descendants of the review of research results and the question word "how" classification, on the usual terms in rare. Stop detailed analysis, from the summary of the new "how" the grammatical features. The initial ancient Chinese interrogative word "how" in Korean expression methods are analyzed, and then the similarities and differences between them. In the process of analysis, we have two important steps to stop. First step to South Korea, the most frequently used Korean University plain near family civilization Research Institute of Chinese Korean dictionary based on, analysis of the "how" the way of Korean Bangbian used in ancient Chinese interrogative words. The second step in the second chapter to the fourth chapter in the study of ancient Chinese interrogative word "how" the grammar characteristic as main object of study, analysis of the usage of "how" translated into Korean will happen after the expression method, and Chinese Korean dictionary "in the" how to "stop the comparisons. We invented the "five kind of expression method does not exist:" ("Korean dictionary? (?) ()? )". Through the comparative analysis of the process, the more prominent the Chinese word "how" characteristics. Study of our desire to be helpful to the study or may study ancient Chinese interrogative words "how" achievement. 目录: |
