| 到今朝为止，对于‘(？)’的研究结果较多，然则学术界还没有杀青共鸣。词类上，有的学者以为‘(？)’是动词，有的以为是描述词，韩语论文，有的以为是存在词。‘(？)’的用法多样庞杂，对于母语是汉语的韩语进修者来讲控制其用法比拟难，母语是韩国语的汉语进修者来讲‘(？)’在汉语中的对应情势也很难掌握。本文以已有的先行研究为基本剖析并阐述‘(？)’在汉语中的对应情势。本文聚焦于‘(？)’的意义及句法特点停止研究。韩国语‘(？)’既有本用言的用法又有帮助用言的用法，韩语论文，本文将重点放在‘(？)’作为虚词的用法上。第一章绪论部门重要引见了研究目标，先行研究，研究办法及资料的选定。个中先行研究包含韩国对‘(？)’的先行研究和中国对‘(？)’的对此研究。第二章考核了‘(？)’的意义、句法特点。作为虚词的‘(？)’意义可以分为15种，这15种意义归结为表近况况性的意义和举措性的意义。第三章中重要阐述了‘(？)’在汉语中的对应词及衔接词上的对应情势。第四章是结论。归纳综合了前三章的内容并指出了缺乏。本论文从语义，句子结构等方面阐述了韩国语的‘(？)’在汉语中的对应情势。愿望对母语为汉语的韩国语进修者和母语为韩国语的汉语进修者有所赞助。 Abstract: So far, about '(? ) "more research results, but the academic circles haven't reached consensus. Lexical category, some scholars think that '(? Is a verb, some think it is a description of the word, some thought it was a word. '(? 'the usage of diverse on mother tongue is Chinese Korean learners in terms of control the usage of the analogy is difficult, are native speakers of Korean Chinese learners in terms of "? The corresponding situation in Chinese is also very difficult to grasp. In this paper, the existing research for the basic analysis and elaboration of '(? Correspondence form in chinese. This article focuses on '(? The meaning and syntactic features of the ''. "(Korean? Is the usage of the words and the use of words, this article will focus on the "(?) As function words usage). The first chapter is an introduction to the research objectives, research, research methods and data selection. One of the first studies to include South Korea "(? 'the first seminar and China' (?) This is a discussion. In the second chapter, "(?" Meaning and syntactic features. As the word "(? Meaning can be divided into 15 kinds, these 15 kinds of meaning can be attributed to the performance of the significance and the significance of the initiative. In the third chapter, it is important to explain. Correspondence in Chinese and the corresponding form of cohesive words. The fourth chapter is the conclusion. Summarized the contents of the first three chapters and pointed out the lack of. This paper from the aspects of semantics, sentence structure describes the Korean "(? Correspondence form in chinese. Desire for Chinese speakers of Korean learners and native speakers of Korean Chinese learners have sponsored. 目录: 摘要 7-8 Abstract 8 目录 9-11 正文 11-66 参考文献 66-68 附录 68-69 |
