| 情况侵权义务成为特别的侵权成绩，韩语毕业论文，是现今社会须迫切处理的成绩，情况伤害补偿胶葛同样成为了当今审讯上的热门和难点成绩。我国从80年月开端看重情况侵权义务的成绩。从1982宪法到2009年侵权义务法，情况侵权义务一向赓续的成长和完美，然则由于侵权义务法出台时光不久，现实操作上有着许多破绽，理论中也存在着诸多成绩。韩国情况侵权的研究时光比我们国度早，律例、学说和判例的联合构成了较为完全的情况侵权义务法系统。对于受污者的掩护上也有着很好的理论经历。本文想经由过程中韩比拟引见韩国的情况侵权义务轨制，并愿望经由过程比拟中韩两国的情况侵权义务轨制能摸索出完美中国情况侵权义务轨制的办法。本文重要从三方面阐述了中韩情况侵权义务。起首，引见了中国的情况侵权义务。根本内容包含概念、归责准绳、组成要件、诉讼时效的实用等。我国情况侵权义务的归责准绳采严厉义务，即无错误义务。情况侵权义务实用举证义务颠倒准绳。情况侵权义务是我国侵权义务法中属于特别侵权义务，所以实用特别的诉讼时效。其次，引见了韩国有关情况侵权义务。根本内容包含概念、特点、归责准绳、组成要件、诉讼时效。韩国从70年月开端存眷情况侵权义务成绩。自1963年制订公害避免法以来，重要以造孽行动法、物权法、相干公法为根据并联合学说和判例来处理情况净化胶葛成绩。最初，本文经由过程对中韩两国情况侵权义务的相干轨制比拟研究，剖析了两国轨制的好坏，提出了我国若何自创韩国的情况侵权义务轨制的相干划定来完美我国情况侵权义务法的立法建议。起首，在比拟剖析中韩情况侵权义务归责准绳的基本上，提出中国应对物感性的情况净化划定错误义务准绳，在必定水平下限制受净化者在情况侵权义务中的位置，赐与净化者必定水平的掩护来保证社会公正成绩；在错误义务的实用上，应自创韩国过掉义务准绳，如许有益于掩护优势位置的受污者；在情况侵权义务组成要件上须单设守法性，并自创韩国守法性中‘忍耐限制’的断定尺度来完美组成要件的实际成绩；在因果关系的推定上，中国运用特别的举证义务措施，即举证义务颠倒，韩国事以盖然性说和新盖然性说等学说来指点因果关系。其次，韩语论文网站，对多半净化者形成的伤害补偿义务，我国应自创韩国多半净化者形成伤害义务的道理。受污者证实净化者的行动与伤害成果有因果关系时，由被证实形成伤害的净化者来承当义务。净化者能证实本身的行动与伤害成果没有因果关系的时可以避免责。净化者证实本身的行动与部门伤害成果有因果关系时，只对部门承当响应义务。在不相符上述情况时，应对伤害成果承当连带补偿义务。再次，本文对情况侵权义务的免责前提和加重事由停止了比拟研究。我国应自创韩国对于应运用比避免责任更严厉的预感能够性作为因弗成顺从的天然灾祸而不承当义务的事由，如许更有益于掩护情况和受污者的好处。对于天然灾祸招致的伤害也应划定响应的加重义务，应以比例免去天然灾祸招致的部门。如斯一来，更能让受污者获得有益的救援；在情况侵权义务的承当措施上，应自创韩国的制止要求权轨制来完美我国排出妨碍承当措施的系统。最初，比拟剖析了中韩两国在司法理论中对情况侵权义务的救援措施。我国应自创韩国情况胶葛调剂委员会的调剂轨制，完美我国情况胶葛处理机制的缺乏。在诉讼救援措施下，应自创韩国制止要求权的诉讼轨制来完美排出妨碍诉讼救援的缺点；在伤害补偿诉讼上，应自创韩国的担保轨制来完美我国情况侵权伤害补偿履行难的成绩。别的，在诉讼时效的实用上应自创韩国相干诉讼时效的划定：‘从受净化者晓得被伤害或晓得加害人之日起的3年，从侵权行动之日起的10年。’如许更有益于掩护受污者的权益，同时催促受污者在法按期限行家使本身的诉讼权力。 Abstract: In the case of tort liability to become a special infringement, is the urgent need to deal with the results of the situation, the situation of damage compensation rubber Ge also become a hot and difficult problems in today's trial results. In our country, the result of the infringement of the situation is valued in the beginning of 80. From 1982 the constitution to in 2009, "tort liability law, case of tort liability always ceaseless development and perfect. However due to the" tort liability law "promulgated time soon, practice has a many flaws, the theory also exist many problems. The study time of the Republic of Korea tort is earlier than our country, and the combination of law, doctrine and case law has formed a relatively complete system of tort liability law. On the cover of the unclean person also has a very good theoretical experience. This paper want to by China and South Korea compared introduce Korea of tort liability system, desire and through the compare between China and South Korea the tort liability system to find the perfect China tort liability system of rail way. In this paper, it is important to explain the situation of China and South Korea tort obligations from three aspects. First of all, introduced the situation of China's tort liability. The basic content includes the concept, the principle of accountability, the composition of elements, the practical application of the statute of limitations. In our country, the criterion of liability of tort liability is strict, that is, there is no wrong obligation. Case of tort liability and practical proof obligations upside down. The tort liability is a special tort liability in tort law of our country. Secondly, the introduction of the South Korean infringement obligations. The basic content includes the concept, characteristics, principles of accountability, the elements of the composition, the prescription of action. South Korea from 70 years beginning to pay attention to the situation of the case of infringement. From 1963 to formulate the pollution to avoid law since, important to sinful action law, property law, relevant law according to combined the theory and case to deal with the situation purification glue Gregory scores. Initially, this paper through the process of situation between China and the ROK tort liability coherent rail system comparison research, analyzes the two track system is good or bad, proposed how our own South Korea tort liability system of the relevant provision to perfect China's tort liability law of the legislative proposals. First of all, in the comparative analysis of China and South Korea of tort liability imputation principle basically, put forward to China emotional purification delineated the principle of liability by mistake, purification of restrictions in the tort liability in the case in a certain level position, which must cover the level of purification to ensure the achievement of social justice; in practical wrong duty that should learn from South Korea off duty principle, polluted so beneficial to cover advantage position; in the tort liability element on the subject to the law of a single set, and from the South Korean Law of "patience limit" that scale to perfect parts of the actual results; in the causation presumption, Chinese the application of special obligation of proof method, namely, the burden of proof upside down, Korea is new to probability and probability theory to guide the causal relationship. Secondly, most of the damage to the formation of the purification of the compensation obligations, China should create their own South Korea most of the reasons for the formation of the responsibility of the harm. Polluted confirmed that the purification of action and damage results have causality and purifier of was confirmed by formation damage to bear obligations. The purified person can prove that there is no cause and effect relationship between the action and the harm result. The purifier confirmed the causal relationship itself action and department damage results, only the response obligation of departments. In does not match the situation, deal with the damage results jointly and severally compensation obligation. Again, this article on the situation of the infringement of the premise and the reasons for the exemption of the comparative study. China should draw lessons from South Korea on application than avoiding responsibility for more severe hunch can of as inver into Shun from natural disasters and does not assume the obligation of the subject matter, such more beneficial to the benefits of the protection of the environment and polluted. The damage caused by natural disasters should also be defined in response to increased obligations, which should be removed from the Department of natural disasters. In this way, can obtain useful aid for polluted; in the case of tort liability to bear, should own South Korea stop requirements in rail system to perfect our country's discharge hinder bear method system. At first, the comparative analysis of China and South Korea in the judicial theory of the situation of the tort liability of the rescue method. Our country should make the adjustment of the system, perfect our country situation and the lack of the mechanism of the glue. In litigation rescue method, should learn from South Korea to stop right litigation system requirements to perfect discharge hinder the shortcomings of litigation relief; in the damage compensation lawsuit should be created South Korea's security rail system to perfect our country tort injury compensation performance of the difficult problem. In addition, in the practical application of the statute of limitations should be the prescription of Korean related litigation prescription: "from the person who knows to be injured or know the perpetrators from the date of 3 years, from the date of tort action from the date of 10 years." This is more conducive to the protection of the rights and interests of the people, while urging the people in the law by the deadline to make their own legal rights. 目录: |
