| 低频度副词是汉韩两种说话中配合存在且常常运用的一种词类。中国说话学界对频度副词停止了热闹的评论辩论，但韩国语学界多半学者仍把频度副词看成时光副词的一个次类来研究。今朝为止对频度副词的研究还重要集中在本体层面和微观层面，对频度副词某一下位分类的比较研究还处于起步阶段。鉴于此，本文把频度副词从时光副词中自力出来，并重要比较研究其下位分类的一种一低频度副词，从比较说话学的角度动身，韩语毕业论文，采取共时描述的办法，从语义、句法、语用三个方面临比剖析了中韩低频度副词，并双向归结了它们的对应情势和对应前提，力图在客不雅描述的基本上，找出中韩低频度副词的差异及缘由。语义方面，提出了中韩低频度副词分为普通语义特点和特别语义特点的不雅点，并逐词剖析归结，总结出了其对应情势和对应前提。句法方面，重要从句法散布、共现关系、句法性能等三个方面临比剖析了中韩低频度副词，发明了中韩低频度副词位于句首表强调时的表示差别和与副词下位分类共现时在分列性方面的差别，同时指出了两种说话的低频度副词在句法性能方面的配合点和分歧点。语用方面，重要从语用性能、句型散布和运用频度三方面来考核中韩低频度副词的个性和特性。文章在比较剖析中韩低频度副词的配合点和分歧点的同时，对说话外部的几个近义词研究对象间也做出了比较，对两说话的本体研究也具有必定的价值。愿望本研究结果为中韩频度副词的研究进献一份薄力，韩语论文范文，同时，能给国际先生的韩国语进修及韩国人的汉语进修供给必定的赞助。 Abstract: Adverbs of low frequency is a kind of lexical category which is used in the two kinds of words in Chinese and Korean. Chinese language educational circles of frequency adverbs in lively discussions, but Korean scholars most scholars still put adverbs of frequency as adverbs of time a class to study. At the present, the research on frequency adverbs is also important in the ontology and micro level, and the comparative study of the classification of adverbs of frequency is still in the initial stage. In view of this, the frequency adverbs from the adverbs of time independent, and an important comparative study of the lower classification of a low frequency adverbs, set out from the angle of comparative learning to speak, take synchronic description of the way, from three aspects: semantic, syntactic and pragmatic pro than analysis of the low frequency adverb in Han, and two-way due to their corresponding situation and the corresponding premise, trying to identify similarities and differences and reasons for low frequency adverbs in objectively describe the basic. In semantic aspect, it is proposed that the low frequency adverbs in China and Korea are divided into general semantic features and special semantic features. Syntax, important syntactic distribution, three aspects of the relationship, syntactic properties of pro than analysis of the low frequency adverbs, the invention of the low frequency adverbs in the first sentence that the said difference and and lower classification of adverb is currently in the breakdown of the difference, at the same time pointed out two speak low frequency adverbs of degree in terms of syntactic properties with point and bifurcation point. In terms of pragmatics, the importance of the three aspects of the pragmatic function, the distribution of sentence patterns and the frequency of application to assess the personality and characteristics of the low frequency adverbs in China and South korea. The comparative analysis between China and Korea low frequency adverbs of degree with point and bifurcation point at the same time, to talk with external several synonyms research object also made comparison of two speak of ontology research also has certain value. Wish this research results for study of Korean adverbs of frequency into the offer of a thin edge, at the same time, to international students for a Korean study and Korean Chinese learning supplies must be sponsored. 目录: 致谢 4-5 Abstract 5 摘要 6-7 韩文摘要 7-8 目录 8-11 正文 11-99 参考文献 99-103 |
