| 市场经济下农业的支撑成绩是世界列国经济研究者和决议计划者配合面对的困难，韩语论文范文，特别是在全球食粮缺乏的明天，农业的基本位置和弱质家当特点决议了必需对农业停止支撑。我国事生齿年夜国，也是农业年夜国，农业的成长状态关乎全部公民经济的运转。我国历久以来的“以农补工”成长形式使得农业支撑程度低且效力低下，改造低效的农业支撑的压力日渐增年夜，以后增进农业成长和增长农人支出，急需强无力的农业支撑政策。但是现阶段我国农业支撑进程中存在年夜量成绩，如农业支撑力度不敷，农业支撑办法效力低下，农业支撑政策构造不公道等等，是以，树立和完美公道的农业支撑系统异样是亟待处理的成绩。论文拔取韩国作为比拟研究对象。虽然中国和韩国政治体系体例和文明传统分歧，经济成长所处阶段和程度存在伟大差别，然则对任何一个家当来讲，固然在分歧阶段的成长会不尽雷同，然则其重要的成长纪律是相通或类似的，韩语论文，韩国农业的胜利成长给我们一个可供自创的形式，在我国财务无限的情形下，优化支撑构造、稳固资金起源、转变支撑情势、增强金融支撑力度等，是进步农业支撑效益的可行选择。论文在详实论述农业支撑的根本实际和进一步完美我国农业支撑系统客不雅必定性的基本上，起首运用相干的经济学实际和数据对中韩两国农业支撑范围、支撑力度等方面停止了经济学剖析，然落后一步运用计量经济学剖析办法和比拟研究办法对中韩两国财务农业支撑的外部构造等方面停止了实证剖析。当局作为投资主体，为供给农业公共产物和办事而对农业范畴停止支撑作为以后我国财务农业支撑的主导措施是非常需要和有用的。在农业政策性支撑方面，中国所采用的手腕重要是价钱干涉、财务补助、信贷搀扶和司法掩护，这也是韩国及世界其他蓬勃国度的重要做法，但存在的重要成绩是我国农业政策在制订上的滞后性，和农业政策不克不及依据国度在分歧阶段的国情响应调剂；在农业投入性支撑方面，就国度现有支撑程度而言，我国农业支撑的相对范围和绝对范围均处于上升阶段，但与韩国比拟，不管是支撑力度和资金运用效力方面都存在必定差距；实证研究注解，投入性支撑相对范围的稳固增加是必定趋向，支撑资金运用构造不尽公道，和现行财务收入治理轨制方面的诸多弊病是财务农业投入性支撑资金运用效力低下的重要缘由。直吸收入补助措施比流畅范畴的价钱支撑措施更相符效力准绳，并且可以或许更直接地增长农人支出。论文最初就若何完美我国农业支撑系统和进步财务农业支撑效力提出了响应的政策建议第一，加年夜当局对农业的财务投入力度，优化财务农业投入性收入构造；第二，依据WTO农业协定，改良农产物支撑办法；第三，慢慢深化改造和标准治理农业支撑政策，进步农业支撑政策的运作效力；第四，加速树立健全农业支撑和掩护的司法系统。 Abstract: Under market economy, agriculture supporting performance is the difficulties faced by all countries in the world economy researchers and decision makers with, especially in the global food shortages of tomorrow, agricultural basic position and weak belongings characteristics resolution required for agricultural support. Our country population big country, is also a large agricultural country, agricultural growth for all citizens economic operation state. Since our country is long-term "with farming feeding industry" growth form makes the agricultural support level is low and low efficiency, the inefficient transformation of agriculture supporting pressure increasing Nianye, after promoting agricultural growth and increase farmers spending, need powerful agricultural support policy. But at the present stage our country agriculture support process in the presence of a large number of achievements, such as agricultural support is not enough, agricultural support measures are inefficient, agricultural support policy structure is not reasonable and so on, is, to establish and perfect the reasonable agricultural support system abnormality achievement is to be solved urgently. South Korea as a comparison research object. Although the traditional China and South Korea's political system style and cultural differences, the economic growth of the stage and there is great difference, however in terms of any of his possessions, although in different stages of growth will not identical, however its important development discipline is communicated or similar, Korean Agriculture successful growth to us a form for own, under our unlimited financial situation, optimized the supporting structure, stable funding sources, change support situation, strengthening the financial support is feasible choice to support benefit of agricultural progress. The detailed exposition of agricultural support the basic theory and further perfect our country agricultural support system of customer indecent must of basically, chapeau using coherent economics theory and data of China Korea agriculture support range and supporting efforts to stop the economic analysis, ran behind the step applied econometrics analysis methods and comparative research methods to China and South Korea financial agriculture supporting external structure: an empirical analysis. Government as the main body of investment, for the supply of agricultural public goods and services and agricultural areas to support the support of agricultural areas as a result of China's financial support for agriculture is very necessary and useful. In the support of agricultural policy, China the wrist is important price subsidies, credit support, financial intervention and judicial practices cover, which is important in South Korea and other developed countries in the world, but there is an important achievement in the development of the lag of China's agricultural policy and agricultural policy, can not according to national differences in the situation of agricultural investment in response to adjust; support, support existing on national level, the relative scope of our agricultural support and the absolute range are on the rise, but compared with South Korea, whether there are certain gap force supporting efforts and capital application; empirical research notes, investment support relative range the steady increase is inevitable trend, support funds applied structure is irrational, the disadvantages and the current financial management system is the income The important reason for the low efficiency of the financial investment in agriculture. Straight ceiling income subsidies than smooth category price support method is more in line with the criterion validity, and may directly increase farmers spending. Paper initially how to perfect China's agricultural support system and improve the financial agricultural support effectiveness of the response of the policy recommendations: first, and big government on agricultural financial investment, optimize financial agricultural investment income structure; second, according to the WTO's agreement on agriculture, good agricultural product support measures; third, gradually deepening the renovation and the standard management of agricultural support policy, progress of agricultural support policies of the effectiveness of the operation; the fourth. To accelerate the establishment of sound agricultural support and protection for the judicial system. 目录: |
