| 中韩两国的外商直接投资在本国的经济成长中都占领主要的位置，最近几年来两国之间的直接投资增加很快，但两国外商直接司法轨制方面有着轨制系统和详细轨制存在着相当年夜的异同。本论文将比拟中韩两国的外商直接投资司法轨制，全文共分五章，第一章序文部门“社会成长对外商直接投资法的请求”，第二章“外商直接投资的概念界定”，第三章“中韩两国外商直接投资立法与政策比拟”，第四章“中韩外商直接投资优惠司法轨制”，第五章结论部门“两国外商直接投资司法轨制改良偏向的初步构思”。第一章一社会成长对外商直接投资法的请求，该章提出本文的一些动因和意义，指出活着界经济一体化和增强区域协作，参加WTO的配景下研究中韩两国外商直接投资的需要性。第二章一外商直接投资的概念界定，本章对外商直接投资的概念停止剖析，而且对外商直接投资的司法特点商量。第三章一中韩两国外商直接投资与政策比拟，具体引见和剖析中国和韩国，外商直接投资立法与政策之变迁和两国外商直接投资立法系统的特色，并在此基本上比拟两国因分歧的时代的配景和分歧的轨制，而发生的对于外商直接投资轨制的分歧的熟悉。第四章一中韩外商直接投资优惠司法轨制，优惠轨制对于吸引外商直接投资的一种手腕在中韩两国有着分歧的内容和后果，本章引见两国优惠轨制的差别和类似点，包含所得税、再投资的退税、关税的优惠、区域的优惠等，而且引见韩国在改良外商投资情况方面的办法和后果。第五章一两国外商直接投资司法轨制改良偏向的初步构思，该章相当于结论部门。经由过程中韩两国的外商直接投资司法轨制的比拟剖析，得出外商直接投资对于经济成长的主要的意义，韩语论文范文，韩语论文范文，中韩两国在外商直接投资司法轨制方面的缺乏和须要改良的偏向，指出活着界经济一体化和参加WTO后成长进程中，应充足自创和接收分歧国度的经历和经验。 Abstract: China and South Korea's foreign direct investment in the country's economic growth occupied main position, in recent years the direct investment between the two countries increased quickly, but bilateral foreign direct judicial rail system has a rail system and detailed rail system exist quite big difference. This paper will compare China and South Korea's foreign direct investment legal system. The full text is divided into five chapters, the first chapter preface Department "social development request to the foreign direct investment law". In the second chapter, "the concept of foreign direct investment (FDI) definition, the third chapter" China South Korea bilateral foreign direct investment legislation and policy match ", Chapter Four" China ROK foreign direct investment preferential legal system ", chapter five conclusion" bilateral foreign direct investment judicial institutional improvement of bias preliminary idea. " The first chapter social growth of foreign direct investment law request, this chapter proposed some motives and significance. It is pointed out that the living world economic integration and strengthening regional cooperation, in under the WTO background research between China and ROK foreign direct investment need. The second chapter is the concept of a foreign direct investment is defined in this chapter, the concept of foreign direct investment analysis, and to discuss judicial characteristics of foreign direct investment. Analogy in the third chapter, a Sino South Korea bilateral foreign direct investment and policy, specific introduction and analysis of China and South Korea, the characteristics of foreign direct investment legislation and policy changes and their foreign direct investment legislation system, and on this basis compared to the two countries because of the differences in the age background and discrimination of the rail system, and the differences of foreign direct investment in the rail system familiar. In the fourth chapter, a Korea foreign direct investment preferential legal system, preferential rail system on attracting foreign direct investment a wrist in China and South Korea have different content and consequences, this chapter introduces two preferential rail of the differences and similarities, including income tax and investment tax, tariff concessions, regional concessions, and introduce Korea method in the improvement of foreign direct investment and consequences. The fifth chapter one or two foreign direct investment of judicial system preliminary idea of reform of the system of bias, this chapter is equivalent to the conclusion department. Through the process of China and South Korea's foreign direct investment judicial rail system by comparative analysis, draw foreign direct investment on the economic growth of major significance, China and South Korea in terms of foreign direct investment legal system deficiency and need improvement in bias, pointed out that the living world economic integration and the accession to the WTO after the growth process should be sufficient internally generated and received different countries experience and. 目录: |
