| 本文在年夜量浏览中国和韩公法学律例条则和文献的基本上，对中韩两国观光社规制系统停止了较为具体体系的比较研究。文章起首对观光社和观光社规制系统等相干概念停止了梳理，并较为详实地对中国和韩国的观光社成长过程停止了概述，简略剖析了观光社规制系统对观光社业的感化和作用。对于中韩观光社规制系统的比较，文章从微观规制系统、微不雅规制系统和运作机制三个方面停止比较剖析。在微观规制系统的比较中对中韩两公法学律例系统的演进进程停止了比拟详实地概述，对演进进程中的雷同点和分歧点停止了剖析，观光社行政治理体系体例的比较重要从旅游行政治理部分和行业协会两个方面停止。微不雅规制系统对观光社的进入规制、运营规模、办事质量规制停止了商量，个中进入规制的比较包含观光社的设立前提(包含注册本钱、质量包管金和设立分社)和请求法式的比较。营业包管金和各级旅游质检则组成了观光社办事质量系统。在观光社的运作进程中，韩语论文，观光社进入和加入行业的治理、从业人员资历的治理和旅游花费者权益的掩护是观光社运作可否胜利的症结地点。从业人员(本文重要指点游人员)资历的治理，本文对中韩两国从业人员资历的获得和从业标准分离停止了论述和比较。旅游花费者权益的掩护一向是旅游立法最存眷的方面，旅游合同的制订、保险金的参加、当局和社会各界的监视治理都是保证旅游者花费权益的主要手腕，本文也根据旅游花费者权益立法的重点停止相干的比拟，并提出了一些国际观光社立法中至今还没有触及的方面。经由对中韩两国观光社规制系统的一系列的比较剖析，归纳综合了两国规制系统的特色及优缺陷。在比较剖析的基本上，对中国观光社司法学例的扶植提出响应的对策，为将来中国观光社的立法重点及应留意的事项供给了必定的参考。综上所述，本项研究卖力比拟了中国观光社条例和韩国不雅光复兴法及其实行令和实行规矩对观光社的设立及运营的划定，较为深刻和周全地研究了中国和韩国观光社的司法学例系统，并对差异点停止了比较和剖析。跟着中韩两国旅游交换水平的日趋加深，观光社作为招待旅游者的主要行业，若何为中韩旅游者供给一个优越的旅游情况，加倍有用的保护旅游花费者的权益也变的越发急切，增强旅游立法无疑是最直接、最有用的手腕。本文经由过程对韩国的旅游立法的深刻的研究，归纳综合并出现出一个较为清楚的韩国观光社司法框架，愿望从中吸取韩国旅游立法的经历和经验，为国际观光社立法供给了一些参考，韩语论文，同时对我国对于国外观光社规制系统的研究也做了一个无益的弥补。 Abstract: This article in the eve of the volume of Chinese and Korean public laws and regulations and the literature on the basic, the two countries of China and South Korea travel agency regulation system to stop a more specific system of comparative study. The chapeau of travel agency and tourist agency regulation system coherent concept combing, and more detailed to China and South Korea the travel agency that growth process was reviewed. A brief analysis of the regulation system of the tourism agency of the travel agency industry effect and influence. On the comparison of China and South Korea travel agency regulation system, the article from the micro regulation system, micro regulation system and operation mechanism of the three aspects of comparative analysis. In the comparison of the micro regulation system of China and South Korea both public laws and regulations system evolution process stopped detailed overview of analogy, the evolution process of the similarities and differences between the analysis, travel agency administrative management system of important stop from two aspects of the tourism administration department and Industry Association. Micro regulation system of travel agent into the regulation, the scale of operation, service quality regulation cease to discuss, medium the entry regulation contain travel agency set up premise (including registered capital, quality guarantee and the establishment of branches) and French request. Business guarantee and tourism quality inspection at all levels constitute the tourism service quality system. In the process of the operation of the travel agency, the travel agency to enter and join the management of the industry, the management of the qualifications of the employees and the protection of tourists' rights and interests is the key to the success of the tourism service. In this paper, the management of the qualifications of practitioners (this article is an important guide), this paper discusses and compares the qualification of Chinese and Korean employees and the separation of their professional standards. Cover of the rights and interests of travel expense is always the tourism legislation in most concern, travel contract formulation, insurance participate, authorities and the community supervision and management are important means to ensure that tourists spend rights, this paper also according to the travel costs of legislation of the rights of focusing on relatively coherent, and puts forward the some international travel service legislation has not touched. Through a series of comparative analysis of the regulation system of China and Korea, the characteristics and advantages and disadvantages of the two countries' regulation system are summarized. On the base of comparative analysis, the author puts forward the Countermeasures for the construction of the judicial rules of China's tourist agencies, which will provide a reference for the legislation of China's tourism agency in the future and the matters that should be paid attention to. In summary, this research is hard to compare the Chinese tourism agency regulations and South Korea the indecent Light Recovery Act and actually visit and to execute the rules of travel agency establishment and operation of the designated, profound and comprehensive study of the China and Korea National Tourism Organization laws and regulations system, and the similarities and differences to stop the comparison and analysis. Along with China and South Korea tourism exchange level of increasingly deepening, travel agency as the main industry of entertainment tour, how to Sino South Korean tourists to provide a superior tourism, double useful to protect tourism consumer rights and interests has become more urgent, enhance tourism legislation is undoubtedly the most direct and effective means. The through the deep research of process of South Korea's tourism legislation, summed up comprehensive and appears a more clear Korea Tourism Agency judicial framework, desire from draw experience and the experience of tourism legislation in South Korea, for international travel service legislation to provide some reference, also on the research about the foreign travel agency regulation system in our country also made an unhelpful for. 目录: |
