本文就中韩FTA成立后对中韩两国钢铁家当产物内商业的作用停止了深刻过细的研究,本文的研究目标有三个,第1、从微观层面剖析中韩FTA成立后对两国钢铁家当的作用。第2、剖析中韩FTA成立后对两国钢铁产物商业构造和竞争关系的作用。第3、提出相干政策建议。基于后人运用CGE模子研究FTA对商业的作用,本文自创其办法猜测中韩FTA成立后中韩各类钢铁产物的商业额,并对中韩两国钢铁家当商业竞争指数及两国钢铁家当内商业指数停止了剖析。本论文的立异点在于将微观层面目标落实到微不雅层面的目标,同时力争以一种连接性的逻辑来剖析中韩FTA带来的作用。中国对钢铁产物的关税高于韩国,是以,中韩FTA惹起的撤消关税后果是韩国对中国出口年夜于韩国对中国出口。所以,对于中韩FTA的猜测会强化今朝两国钢铁产物的分工构造与竞争关系,但这研究措施未将中国钢铁家当与中韩钢铁生意业务的敏捷成长等限制身分斟酌在内。归纳综合中韩FTA对两国钢铁家当带来的微观层面的作用以下:两国钢铁家当商业额的变量是韩国的出口与出口各增长5。1%和2。5%,韩语毕业论文,中国的出口和出口各增长1。0%和2。5%:中韩钢铁家当商业变量猜测为,韩国对中国出口量增长22。6%,韩国对中国出口量增长6。9%。该变更率应用于55个钢铁产物(HS4单元)以后得出商业竞争指数和家当内商业指数的成果以下:因为韩国对中国出口的增加幅度年夜于韩国对中国出口的增加幅度。是以韩国对中国出口的钢铁产物的出口优势水平上升,相反,韩国对中国出口的钢铁产物的出口优势水平则是降低的。因为中国钢铁家当的技巧程度的讯速成长,在成立中韩FTA的时点,显示出逆转比拟优势产物的能够性异常年夜,是以韩国钢铁家当应当结构一个比较较优势决议身分停止及时剖析的系统。还有,为避免两国钢铁家当的供应多余,两国须要构建配合对应体系。另外,为了强化韩国钢铁家当的国际竞争力,免费韩语论文,除对开辟技巧连续投资和现有的计谋协作等限制性的归并以外,还须要建立海内投资计谋和与国际外公司的公司并购计谋。 Abstract: The FTA between China and South Korea after the establishment of China and South Korea iron and steel industrial products business impact stop the profound and meticulous research, the purpose of the study of this paper have three. The first, from the micro level analysis of FTA between China and South Korea after the establishment of the bilateral steel belongings effect. Second, analysis of China and South Korea FTA after the establishment of the two countries on the relationship between the commercial structure of steel products and the impact of competition. Third, put forward the relevant policy recommendations. Influence of later generations of CGE model study of FTA based on the business, this paper created the speculation after the establishment of the China Korea FTA between China and South Korea all kinds of steel products trade, and in China and South Korea iron and steel furniture business competitiveness index and bilateral steel furniture business index to carry on the analysis. Innovation of this thesis lies in micro level goals to implement the goal of micro level, and strive to a connection of logic to analyze the influence brought by the FTA between China and South Korea. China's tariff on iron and steel products is higher than that of South Korea, is to, China and South Korea FTA caused by the consequences of the withdrawal of South Korea's exports to China, South Korea, China's exports to china. Therefore, speculation on the Sino Korea FTA will strengthen both iron and steel product division structure and competitive, but this research method not China Iron and steel furniture and South Korea steel business agile growth limiting factors into consideration. Summed up China Korea FTA on bilateral steel belongings of micro level the following effects: the variables of the iron and steel furniture trade volume between the two countries is Korea's exports and exports increased by 5. 1% and 2. 5%, China's exports and exports grew by 1. 0% and 2. 5%: South Korea steel house commercial speculation as to Chinese variables, Korean exports grew by 22. 6%, South Korea's exports to China increased by 6. 9%. The rate of change in 55 steel products (HS4 unit) and then obtains business competitiveness index and possessions in the commercial index as follows: because the South Korean exports to China increased greatly in South Korea exports to China increased. Is to South Korea to China's exports of iron and steel products, the level of export advantage, instead, South Korea on China's exports of steel products, the level of export advantage is lower. Because of the skill level of China's iron and steel furniture rapid growth and point in the establishment of the China Korea FTA, showing reversed compared to the product advantages to the eve of the anomaly, to South Korean steel belongings should structure a relatively advantage identity resolution stop time in the analysis of the system. Also, in order to avoid the steel supply superfluous belongings, the two countries need to build with the corresponding system. Also in order to strengthen the international competitiveness of South Korean steel possessions, except to develop skills continuous investment and existing strategic cooperation and other restrictive merge must establish the strategy of overseas investment and international business enterprise M & a strategy. 目录: |