| 上海汽车收买韩国双龙汽车是中国公司收买吞并韩国公司的典范案例，而韩国SK通信收买中国联通3G营业股权则又是韩国公司收买中国公司的代表性案例。今朝，中韩两国间的经济商业来往赓续增长，并从久远来看有更进一步的趋向。岂论从司法实务的角度，照样从列国当局对跨国金融运动及家当转移范畴的监管而言，对中韩两国公司收买吞并法式的司法差异点停止比拟剖析，具有明显的应用价值和必定的实际意义。本篇论文重要是针对中韩两国在对方的国度停止收买吞并时的相干法则停止剖析的同时，将重点放在中韩两国收买吞并对方国度公司时的法式的配合点上，并指出差别点剖析其缘由。从1992年中韩两国建交以离开如今，韩国公司收买中国公司99％以上的中国公司长短上市企业。是以，本论文里将两个国度的收买吞并上的法式比拟限制在中韩两国收买对方国度非上市企业的情形。同时，对中韩两国公司在收买对方国度公司时的限制划定及往后中国将会以何种措施制订本国公司的收买吞并司法方面停止了比拟和剖析。本篇论文重点记叙中国公司收买韩国公司的法式，并将对韩国公司收买中国公司的法式和中国公司收买韩国公司的法式的差别点在恰当章节细心加以解释。全文共分四章：第一章为概述部门。分三个末节写了在韩国与收买吞并相干联的法则及其法则的重要内容和在中国本国公司收买吞并中国公司时的相干的法则，并对其重要内容停止了整顿和剖析。其次，韩语毕业论文，针对收买和吞并的整体的流程，解释中国和韩国的法式上的配合点以后，免费韩语论文，在差别点上做了整顿。最初，对收买和吞并的计谋建立及目的公司的选择上，以配合点为主停止解释的同时对在中国选定目的公司时所制止的家当停止了整顿。第二章在写了初步会谈和相干司法文件制成的同时，对中韩两国在这一方面的差异点长进行了剖析整顿。第三章，终究会谈以后生成收买吞并合同，在本章里除对终究司法文件的内容做了具体的解释外，还对中韩两国在这一法式上的差异点停止了比拟剖析。第四章，对中韩两国停止收买吞并时的司法上的限制划定停止了比拟剖析。 Abstract: Shanghai car to buy Ssangyong Motor is a classic case of Chinese enterprises purchase annexation of Korea enterprise, and South Korea SK communications bought China Unicom's 3G business ownership is a representative case of South Korean companies to buy Chinese companies. At present, the economic and commercial ties between China and South Korea to increase ceaselessly, and in the long run trend further. No matter from the angle of judicial practice, still from various countries' government supervision of cross-border financial activity and belongings category transfer in terms of, of Chinese and Korean enterprises buy annex French judicial similarities and differences between point stop comparative analysis, has certain obvious use value and practical value. This thesis is for China and South Korea in each other's country to carry on the purchase annexation of the coherence rule stop analysis at the same time, focus in China and South Korea buy annex each other national enterprises with French, and pointed out the difference analysis of its causes. From 1992 China and South Korea established diplomatic relations to leave today, South Korean companies to buy Chinese enterprises more than 99% of the length of the listing Corporation. It is in this paper, the two countries of the acquisition of the annexation of the French restrictions in China and South Korea to buy each other's state non-listed company. At the same time, China and South Korea to buy each other's state enterprises in the limit of the delineation and the future of China will be in what ways to develop their own businesses to buy the annexation of the judicial aspects of the comparison and analysis of the comparison and analysis. In this thesis, the narrative focus Chinese companies buying South Korean companies are French, and on Chinese enterprises in South Korean companies to buy French and Chinese companies to buy Korean companies French differences in appropriate chapters carefully explained. The full text is divided into four chapters: the first chapter is an overview of the department. Divided into three subsections wrote in South Korea and buy the annexation of the related laws and rules of the important content and in the Chinese domestic enterprises purchase annexation of China enterprise coherence rule, and rectification and the analysis of its important content. Secondly, in view of the whole process of buying and annexation, the Chinese and South Korea to explain the French after the point, at the point of difference to rectify. Initially, establish the strategy of buying and annexing and objective of the enterprise, to match the point mainly stop explanation of objective enterprise is selected in China by the suppression of the belongings to stop the rectification. The second chapter in the preliminary talks and the relevant judicial documents made at the same time, China and South Korea in this aspect of the similarities and differences between the two points to carry out an analysis and rectification. The third chapter, after all, after meeting generation buy the annexation of the contract, except for eventually the contents of judicial documents made specific explanation, but also to China and South Korea in the French on the similarities and differences between the stop the comparative analysis in this chapter. The fourth chapter, the two countries to stop the merger of the judicial restrictions on the delineation of the comparison analysis. 目录: |
