| 本论文是对于20世纪中韩两国的平易近族情势修建成长进程上的表示趋势和惹起其趋势的修建内在身分的剖析研究，是两国修建表示趋势的差别比拟研究。核心重要在于1945年二战后到1980年之前的两公民族国度扶植进程傍边的修建表示睁开方面。汗青以来中韩两国属于统一个文明圈子，而地舆地位上临近。基于中国的修建文明，韩国传统修建在营建措施、修建思惟上，韩语论文，以孔教、道教、风水、阴阳五行等的思惟继续着其古修建说话，在如许的基本上加以韩国固有的天然不雅和修建不雅构成了韩国固有的修建文明。19世纪被东方列强强制翻开国门后，两国以匠工资主的固有修建系统面对伟大的变更，因而两国外乡上涌现器械折衷式的近代修建款式，韩语论文范文，到了20世纪在平易近族国度扶植的命题下，掀起了为恢复平易近族自立精力的修建运动。其时因为世界构成认识形状的两年夜阵营，中韩两国的修建成了政治家完成某个理念的手腕，修建范畴涌现以情势为主的直不雅的表示趋向。即在修建行动上涌现以传统继续与认识形状表现为主的两年夜趋向。其时因为时期缘由，没有交换的中韩两国在各自国际存在相相似的社会配景及修建潮水。两国在平易近族国度扶植的年夜命题长进行的修建理念摸索及其理论，有很多差异的地方，值得比拟研究。论文的核心在于1945年到1980年，以这时候期著作实例为剖析的话，其时在中公民族情势修建实例中将传统修建元素的原用与社会心识形状的表示修建涌现得比拟多，并且与韩国纷歧样很少涌现传统修建元素的变用修建实例。韩公民族情势修建表示趋向中将传统修建元素的变用为主的实例涌现的比拟多，并且其他趋向也均有。这解释了修建反响其时两国社会的传统的请求和社会理念寻求水平。 Abstract: This thesis is about the analysis of the trend of the development of the national situation in China and the construction of the building of the growth process and the construction of its trend. The core is important in 1945 after World War II, prior to 1980 two national public construction process construction said open hand sideways. Since the history of China and South Korea belong to the same cultural circle, and the location of the geographical proximity. The construction of China civilization based on traditional Korean built in the construction method, construction of ideology, Confucianism, Taoism, in Feng Shui, Yin Yang and five elements had continued its ancient building built in such indecent talk, basically be Korean natural indecent and forms Han Guogu some civilization construction. In nineteenth Century by the eastern powers forced open doors, the two countries to build the main wage system's inherent in the face of great change, and two other instruments on the emergence of modern eclectic style building, by twentieth Century in the nation to foster the proposition, set off for the restoration of the national independence movement energy construction. Because of the world's two years of understanding the shape of the two camps, and the construction of the two countries has become a politician to complete a certain concept of the wrist, the construction of the situation is the main trend of the straight. That is, in the construction of action to continue with the traditional understanding of the shape of the performance of the two years of the main performance. For the reason, there is no exchange of China and South Korea in their respective international presence of similar social background and the construction of the tide. In the construction of the concept of the two countries in the national construction of the proposition to explore and its theory, there are a lot of similarities and differences, it is worth more research. The core of the paper is 1980 to 1945, with the case of the works as an example, the construction of the traditional elements in the situation of the Chinese and the public in the form of the original use of social awareness and the emergence of more and more, and with South Korea have not emerged from the construction of the elements of the construction of an example. The construction of the national situation of the Han and the people of the situation tends to be more and more examples of the change of the traditional building elements, and other trends are also. This explains the building of a response to the traditional request of the two countries and the social concept of seeking a level. 目录: 摘要 2-3 Abstract 3-5 第1章 绪论 8-13 1.1 课题探讨的背景 8-9 1.2 探讨内容 9-10 1.3 探讨目的 10 1.4 探讨意义 10-11 1.5 探讨措施 11-12 1.6 论文探讨框架 12-13 第2章 中韩两国“民族形式”建筑概念定位及其发展概述 13-47 2.1 民族形式建筑用语设定和其范围 14-17 2.1.1 民族主义与民族形式 14-15 2.1.2 “民族形式”建筑概念及其范围 15-17 2.2 中韩两国民族形式建筑演变史略 17-43 2.2.1 解放之前（1945 年前） 17-26 2.2.2 解放后到 1980 年 26-39 2.2.3 1980 年之后 39-43 2.3 小结 43-47 2.3.1 两国民族形式建筑发展过程的时期别特征比较 43-46 2.3.2 中韩两国民族形式建筑发展过程当中异同 46-47 第3章 从建筑师及其代表著作看中韩两国“民族形式”建筑特色 47-83 3.1 中韩两国“民族形式”建筑的代表建筑师 47-68 3.1.1 两国第一代、第二代建筑师 48-49 3.1.2 两国代表性的“民族形式”建筑师与其著作 49-68 3.2 中韩两国对“民族形式”建筑的现代探讨 68-80 3.2.1 中国民族形式建筑的现代探讨 68-73 3.2.2 韩国民族形式建筑的现代探讨 73-80 3.3 小结 80-83 3.3.1 传统继承方面 80-81 3.3.2 社会意识形态方面 81-83 第4章 解放后到 1980 年中韩两国“民族形式”建筑表现趋势比较 83-113 4.1 两国“民族形式”建筑表现趋势归纳 83-90 4.1.1 直接的复古主义 83-84 4.1.2 传统建筑元素的原用 84-85 4.1.3 传统建筑元素的变用 85-86 4.1.4 传统元素的抽象化 86-87 4.1.5 社会意识形态表示 87-90 4.2 两国“民族形式”建筑的实例略论 90-111 4.2.1 中国建筑著作实例 91-100 4.2.2 韩国建筑著作实例 100-108 4.2.3 两国建筑实例按形式分类类型数量化及比较 108-111 4.3 小结 111-113 4.3.1 模仿传统 111-112 4.3.2 纪念业绩 112-113 第5章 结论 113-117 5.1 过去民族形式建筑探究的界限及矛盾 113-115 5.1.1 传统继承方面 113-114 5.1.2 意识形态表达方面 114-115 5.2 传统性表现的现代包容与继承方向 115-116 5.2.1 表现趋势方面 115 5.2.2 形式上从形似转移到神似的过程 115-116 5.3 结语 116-117 参考文献 117-123 致谢 123-124 附录A 1945年至1980年中韩两国年代对照表 124-131 个人简历、在学期间发表的学术论文与探讨成果 131 |
