中韩交通事故损害赔偿责任比较探讨[韩语论文]

资料分类免费韩语论文 责任编辑:金一助教更新时间:2017-05-05
提示:本资料为网络收集免费论文,存在不完整性。建议下载本站其它完整的收费论文。使用可通过查重系统的论文,才是您毕业的保障。
交通变乱伤害补偿义务是侵权义务法中的一个主要构成部门。中华国民共和国途径交通平安法和侵权义务法的实行对我国的交通变乱伤害补偿义务的立法研究有了明显的推进感化,但因我邦交通变乱伤害补偿义务的研究起步比拟晚,许多成绩还待处理。文章重要是对中国和韩邦交通变乱伤害补偿义务的比拟研究,旨在自创韩国的先辈经历,改良和完美我邦交通变乱伤害补偿义务方面存在的一些实际与理论成绩。交通变乱伤害补偿义务,是指交通变乱当事人因错误或不测形成被伤害人的人身损害或许产业丧失,依法应该承当的晦气效果或应该实行的责任。它是一种对等主体之间的人身产业义务。纵不雅中邦交通变乱伤害补偿义务的相干立法和研究,对于交通变乱伤害补偿义务,在归责准绳上实用错误推定准绳;对于交通变乱伤害补偿义务的组成要件应包含伤害现实、因果关系、灵活车的运转和客观错误。对于交通变乱伤害补偿义务主体,司法上界定为“灵活车一方”,但“灵活车一方”这类表述明显没有其确实的寄义,使得在灵活车一切权和运用权更改频仍的情形下,加倍难以肯定义务主体。对于交通变乱伤害补偿义务的别人性,我国还没有相干学说和概念,司法上把驾驶者之外的其它车上乘坐人员一概消除在“别人”的规模以外,使须要掩护的受益人的规模太小。对于交通变乱中的伤害补偿规模重要包含人身伤害和产业丧失两个部门。司法固然对人身伤害的补偿规模尺度作了比拟周全划定,但对产业丧失的补偿项目和尺度,没有详细明白的划定。并且在交通变乱精力伤害补偿的详细操作成绩上,也没有划定同一的盘算尺度,实际上尚存在许多分歧的不雅点。韩国在1963年制订了专门的主动车伤害补偿保证法,历经了20次的修改和完美。韩邦交通变乱伤害补偿义务,在交通变乱伤害补偿义务的归责准绳上实用无过掉义务准绳;对于交通变乱伤害补偿义务的义务主体界定上,将“运转者”划定为义务主体,把运转安排和运转好处的归属作为义务主体的断定尺度。对于交通变乱伤害补偿义务的别人性方面,划定在详细情形下配合运转者、远亲属亲睦意同乘者也能够被认定为“别人”而遭到掩护。对于交通变乱伤害补偿规模重要分为积极伤害、消极伤害、慰籍料(精力伤害补偿)三个部门来处置,而且在盘算慰籍料时,采用定额化的办法,每隔3-4年可调剂慰籍料的尺度数额。比拟研究中韩两邦交通变乱伤害补偿义务我们可得出中韩两国所实用的归责准绳分歧;韩公法在义务主体上划定得也更加明白;韩公法在别人性和补偿规模方面也更加先辈,值得自创。在中邦交通变乱伤害补偿义务的立法和完美方面,中国应自创韩国的“运转者”义务主体划定来明白义务主体的规模;采用并接收韩国有关别人性的学说来扩展交通变乱伤害补偿义务中受益人的规模;在精力伤害补偿方面树立同一的补偿盘算尺度。

Abstract:

The traffic accident damage compensation obligation is an important part of the tort liability law. The the people's Republic of China Road Traffic Safety Law, "and" tort liability law "implement the Legislative Research on China's traffic accident damage compensation obligations have a significant role in promoting, but because I state traffic accident damage compensation responsibility research started relatively late, many problems still to be resolved. The important is to the Chinese and Korean state traffic accident damage compensation obligation comparative study, to own the forefathers of the Korean experience, improve and perfect the state traffic accident damage compensation obligation some practical and theoretical results. Traffic accident damage compensation obligation, refers to the traffic accident parties by mistake or accident form being hurt people's personal injury or industrial loss, according to the law should bear the adverse effect or should implement the responsibility. It is a duty of personal industry between equal entities. Longitudinal not Yazhongbang traffic accident damage compensation obligation of relevant legislation and research, a traffic accident damage compensation obligation, belonging to the responsibility principle and practical fault presumption principle; about the traffic accident damage compensation obligation constituents should contain real injury, causality, flexible vehicle operation and objective error. About traffic accident damage compensation duty main body, justice is defined as "flexible vehicle party", but "flexible vehicle party" this kind of expression no obvious the exact meaning, making in flexible car all right and use right change frequently, twice as hard to affirmative duty on the subject. Others about the traffic accident damage compensation obligations, China is not coherent theory and conception, justice on the outside of the driver of the other car passengers totally eliminated in the scale of "others", the need to cover the beneficiary of the scale is too small. About the traffic accident damage compensation scale contains important personal injury and loss of two industrial departments. Justice is the scale of the compensation for personal injury is relatively comprehensive delineation, but the compensation for the loss of the industry and the scale of the project, no detailed understanding of the delimitation. And in the mental damage compensation of traffic accident with operation results, also do not have delineated with a computing scale, in fact, there are still many differences of indecent point. South Korea in 1963 to develop a dedicated "active car damage compensation Guarantee Law", after 20 times of revision and perfection. Hanbang traffic accident damage compensation obligation, in the traffic accident damage compensate responsibility imputation principle practical without off the principle of liability; definition of a traffic accident damage compensation obligation subject of obligation, the operation designation as a compulsory subject, the operation planning and operation benefits of ownership as the main obligations judgment scale. About the traffic accident damage compensate responsibility others delineated in detail with the operation, distantly related relatives Mu meaning fellow passenger can also was identified as "others" and the cover was. About the traffic accident damage compensation scale of important points for positive damage, negative damage, comfort the material (energy damage compensation) three departments to deal with, and in the calculation of material comfort, the quota, every 3-4 years can adjust the amount of material comfort scale. Compared research between China and South Korea two state traffic accident damage compensation obligation we can come to China and South Korea the practical belong to responsibility principle differences; Han public law on the subject of obligation delineation must also know; Han Gong method in others and compensation scale also more advanced, is worth using for reference. In terms of state traffic accident damage compensation obligation of legislation and perfect, China should own subject delineation of South Korea's "running" obligation to understand the scale of obligations of the subject of; use and receive the doctrine of South Korean people to the expanding of the beneficiary in traffic accident injury compensation obligations; in terms of mental damage compensation set with a compensation calculation scale.

目录:

免费论文题目: