中韩两国外商投资公司法学制度比较探讨[韩语论文]

资料分类免费韩语论文 责任编辑:金一助教更新时间:2017-05-05
提示:本资料为网络收集免费论文,存在不完整性。建议下载本站其它完整的收费论文。使用可通过查重系统的论文,才是您毕业的保障。
外商投资的年夜幅度增加曾经成为当今拉动中国和韩国经济成长的主要动力之一,外商投资对两国经济的作用正日趋加强。可以说,中韩两国的投资情况在曩昔十几年间都有了显著的改良,吸引外资获得了相当年夜的造诣。瞻望将来,两国既具有优越的成长机会,又面对着世界列国竞绝对外开放、相互争取外商投资的严格挑衅。现在,中国已成为韩国最年夜的商业对象国及海内投资国,对韩国公司来讲,中国曾经成为第二国际市场。因为在尊敬司法的社会情况中,完美的对于外商投资的司法、律例和政策是充足保证外商投资公司自立运营和正当权益的主要包管,韩语论文网站,所以法制情况己经成为本国投资者停止投资时最看重的身分之一。但因为中韩两国政治和经济体系体例的分歧,给韩国公司深入懂得中国外商投资司法轨制带来了很多的艰苦。基于此,本文经由过程研究中韩外商投资的司法和轨制,比拟引见韩国外商投资增进法和中国外商投资公司法的概念、特色、立法系统。文章中第一章和第二章重要以引见两个国度的司法轨制为主。对于详细的司法轨制,韩国方面重要从优惠办法、办事增援轨制、经济自在区睁开引见;中国方面重要从外商投资公司的设立、出资、运营治理机构、运营行动标准、闭幕与清理睁开引见。经由过程比拟可以看出,中韩两国在外商投资公司立法上,岂论是立法系统照样详细轨制均存在很年夜的分歧。第三章重要提出了中韩两公法学轨制的完美建议。两国现行的外商投资法均存在若干分歧的成绩,经由过程分离停止商量发明,韩语论文范文,韩国方面的重要成绩是外商投资政策上的吸引力缺乏、外商投资增援部分设置疏散、政策划定缺少一向性等,建议经由过程增强外商投资的吸引力,同一外商投资增援部分和完美限制外商投资的轨制等办法来改良;中国方面的重要成绩是外资司法轨制系统的不公道、轨制的通明度不高和优惠轨制不同一等,建议经由过程重构中国外资司法轨制系统、强化外资治理体系体例通明度和同一外商优惠政策来改良。愿望能经由过程研究引见中韩两国外商投资公司司法轨制的可供互相自创的地方,以到达增进两国之间外商投资之目标,有助于中国外商投资司法轨制的深刻成长,也有助于中韩两国外商投资司法轨制的相互自创参考。

Abstract:

To increase the foreign investment to a large extent has become the most stimulating the growth of the economy of China and Korea is one of the main driving force, the influence of foreign investment on bilateral economic is increasingly strengthened. It can be said, China and South Korea's investment in the past ten years have significantly improved, to attract foreign investment to obtain the quite big attainments. Looking to the future, both with superior growth opportunities, and the face of the countries in the world competing vast opening to the outside world, strive for mutually strict challenge of foreign investment. Now, China has become the South Korea's biggest commercial purchasers and domestic investment in the country, in terms of Korean enterprises, China has become the second international market. Because in the social conditions of respect for justice, perfect on foreign investment in the judicial, statutes and policies is to ensure adequate foreign investment enterprise independent operations and legitimate rights and interests of the important guarantee, so the rule of law has been become domestic investors to invest the most valued identity. But because of the difference of China and South Korea's political and economic systems, to South Korean companies understand China's foreign investment legal system brings a lot of difficult. Based on this, this paper through the study of China and South Korea foreign investment legal and institutional, compared introduce Korea foreign investment increase method and the Chinese foreign investment law concept, characteristics, and the legal system. The first chapter and the second chapter of the article mainly introduces the judicial system of the two countries. A detailed judicial rail system, South Korea important from preferential measures, service reinforcements rail system, economic free zone open introduction; China important from the establishment of enterprises with foreign investment, investment, operation and management mechanism, operation action standards, closing and clean up the introduction of the open. Through comparison, we can see that China and South Korea in the legislation in foreign investment enterprises, is the legislative system still with rail system have very big difference. The third chapter puts forward the perfect suggestion of the two public legal system of China and South Korea. The current foreign investment law, there are some differences between the results, through the process of separation ceases to carry on invention, important achievements of South Korea's foreign investment policy on foreign investment attraction, the lack of reinforcements set evacuation, lack of policy has been delineated, it is suggested that the foreign investment attraction by the process of enhancement, the same part of foreign investment reinforcements restrictions on foreign investment and the perfect system to improve; the important achievements China foreign legal system system is not reasonable, the system of transparency is not high and the preferential system different, suggestions on strengthening the foreign administrative system transparency and the same foreign preferential policies China foreign judicial reconstruction process rail system, improvement. Desire can through studies to introduce China and South Korea enterprises with foreign investment in the two countries judicial rail system for each other their own place, in order to achieve the increase between the two countries foreign investment objectives, helpful to the profound growth of China's foreign investment legal system, also contributed to China and South Korea Foreign Investment between the two countries our law system in the mutual internally generated reference.

目录:

免费论文题目: