The mainly investigates the similarity and difference of coinage method between Korean and Chinese can reveal science and technology development, civilization improvement, human being′s ideology renew in the form of the language and vocabulary...
The mainly investigates the similarity and difference of coinage method between Korean and Chinese can reveal science and technology development, civilization improvement, human being′s ideology renew in the form of the language and vocabulary. Just like social development, coinage formation research is always innovating. Thus it is significance to analyze coinage formation by comparison of Korean and Chinese.
The author first defines coinage of Korean and Chinese, then we do comparative analysis from the aspect of morphology and rhetoric. We compare morphology from the following aspects: derivative, compound, mixing, abbreviate and analogy in the second part. We analyze the borrowing of foreign words and rhetoric formation in the third part.
First of all, we cite some coinage cases of both countries, to compare the derivative method of Korean and Chinese coinage both countries have a great deal of affixes. There are some differences for kind affixes and traditional affixes. However, both still have great grammar function as well as large vocabulary ability. Both have great similarities for derivative formation, and minute difference for quantity.
Second, there are great differences for coinage method from the aspect of compound words. Korean compound consists of common rhetoric and non-common rhetoric. It also composes of compound noun, compound adjective, compound verb, compound adverb, and compound article form the aspect of word classification. And Chinese compound includes parataxis, attribute, subject-verb, verb-objective and complement from the aspect of word structure. Unlike Korean non-common rhetoric, Chinese compound coinage follows rhetoric rule.
Third, we just discus Korean mixing coinage, because most scholars are not in agreement with each other for Chinese mixing methods. The author just do case analyses, we do not find the coinage of Chinese mixing words formation.
Fourth, this compares Korean and Chinese abbreviation method coinage examples concerned with abbreviation method. Chinese abbreviation has wider scope than Korean, such as Korean words have no omnibus word-building method. Both have similarity form compress and truncation. However, Chinese words have more flexible choice for element of vocabulary coinage.
Fifth, we compare analogy word-building method of Korean and Chinese coinage. Analogy includes structure analogy and semantic analogy. Structure analogy consist of 'xstructure' and 'x structure'. Semantic analogy composes antonym analogy and homonym analogy. Korean coinage of analogy is similar with Chinese.
Sixth, as for the issue of foreign vocabulary borrowing of coinage, Korean is phonetic indicating language, thus Korean word-building include direct citation and abbreviation. Whereas, Chinese is semantic indicating language, Chinese′s word-building is different form Korean. The foreign words borrows of Chinese include phonetic translation, semantic translation, semi-phonetic and semi-semantic translation, phonetic and semantic translation, foreign signs and Chinese character, foreign vocabulary exclusive and so on.
Seventh, we compare Korean coinage rhetoric with that of Chinese. Rhetoric is classified by metaphor, overstatement, euphemism. Korean metaphor has wider scope, Chinese rhetoric has some unique cases such as personification, imitative things and borrowing. Both Korean and Chinese have similarities in overstatement and euphemism. With social development, coinage is appearing greatly with the feature of distinctive and vivid.
Based on comparative analysis, we can summarize the word formation of coinage, and predict new trend in the future. Coinage can reveal human being′s development and improvement directly. Thus, we need the latest thinking method and pay attention to the slightest minute to coinage analysis.
，韩语论文范文，韩语论文范文 |
