This study explores what green ODA policy should contain and how it be carried out, based on the case of ‘Green Mongolia’ implemented by Korea Saemaul Undong (new community movement) Center, in cooperation with Mongolian Saemaul Center, to combat ... This study explores what green ODA policy should contain and how it be carried out, based on the case of ‘Green Mongolia’ implemented by Korea Saemaul Undong (new community movement) Center, in cooperation with Mongolian Saemaul Center, to combat desertification in Mongolia. It has analyzed recognition differences in Green Mongolia between Korea, the donor, and Mongolia, the recipient, by focusing on four dimensions of sustainability: economy, society, environment, and human rights. As recognition on the seriousness of environmental problems and efforts to balance environmental protection and economic development grows, numerous national governments and international agencies have increased environment-related aids, in which Korea, the world's first recipient-turned-donor nation, cannot be an exception. In particular, the Q-method, a tool analyzing people’s subjectivity, was used in this and revealed deeper insights into the beliefs and awareness of groups with different perspectives and interests. These results show that Korean respondents have three different discourses: economy·environment-balanced, human rights·environment-balanced, and human rights-centered. As for Mongolia, four facets were identified: environment·society -balanced (I), environment·society -balanced (II), environment·economy -balanced, and human rights -centered. As the donor, instead of providing one-sided Korea’s ‘favor,’ it is significant to re-direct Green Mongolia itself by considering recipient’s preferences, make partnership-based governance through embracing various perspectives, and finally, empower the Mongolian locals by encouraging them to raise self-help spirit by themselves and participate in the community work voluntarily. ，韩语毕业论文，韩语论文题目 |
