본 연구는 성인지적장애인과 언어연령일치아동을 대상으로 용언 활용의 정확도를 형태적 측면을 중심으로 살펴보고자 실시되었다. 연구대상은 지적장애 2-3급의 성인지적장애인 10명과 이... 본 연구는 성인지적장애인과 언어연령일치아동을 대상으로 용언 활용의 정확도를 형태적 측면을 중심으로 살펴보고자 실시되었다. 연구대상은 지적장애 2-3급의 성인지적장애인 10명과 이들과 언어연령일치아동 10명으로 총 20명이었다. 연구 과제를 검증하기 위하여 용언 활용 정확도 검사를 실시하였다. 용언 활용 정확도 검사는 10개 용언, 5개의 어미로 구성되어 있으며, 이들 용언과 어미 결합을 정확히 활용하는가를 측정하였다. 연구의 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 용언활용 정확도 총점에서 성인지적장애 집단은 평균 35.90, 표준편차 12.574이고, 언어연령일치집단은 평균 46.40, 표준편차 2.591로, 용언 활용 정확도 총점에서 두 집단 간 유의한 차이가 나타났다. 둘째, 용언의 규칙성 여부에 따른 용언 활용 정확도에서는 성인지적장애 집단, 언어연령일치아동 집단 간 유의한 차이가 나타났고, 규칙성 여부에서도 차이가 나타났다. 집단과 규칙성 여부 간 상호작용 효과 또한 통계적으로 유의미한데, 규칙 용언 활용 정확도보다 불규칙 활용 정확도에서 상대적으로 집단 간 차이가 크게 나타났다. 규칙성 여부에 따른 용언별 용언 활용에서는 규칙 용언 ‘넣다’, 불규칙 용언 ‘짓다’, ‘걷다’, ‘귀엽다’, ‘색칠하다’, ‘파랗다’에서 성인지적장애 집단과 언어연령일치아동 집단 간 유의한 차이가 나타났다. 셋째, 용언 활용 정확도를 어미별로 살펴 본 결과 연결 어미에서는 ‘니까’와, ‘면’에서 성인지적장애 집단과 언어연령일치아동 집단 간 유의한 차이가 나타났다. 넷째, 성인지적장애 집단과 언어연령일치아동 집단은 오류 유형별 빈도와 오류율의 순서에는 두 집단 간 차이가 나타나지 않았다. 한 가지 특이한 사항은 보조용언 사용과 용언대치 오류가 성인지적장애 집단에서만 관찰되었다. 본 연구 결과 성인지적장애인이 언어연령일치아동에 비해서 용언 활용의 정확한 사용에 어려움이 있으며, 특히 불규칙 용언 활용에서 더 많은 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 결과는 언어적으로 어려움이 있는 지적장애아동들이 용언 활용에서 규칙적인 것은 어느 정도 습득도 되고, 정확하게 사용할 수도 있지만 불규칙 용언의 활용에서는 성인기가 되어서도 여전히 어렵고 실수를 하므로 지적장애아동 중재에서 불규칙 용언 활용의 측면을 지속적으로 관심있게 지도해야 함을 시사하고 있다.
The purpose of this study was to examine the accuracy in the production of iInflected predicates in Adults with intellectual disabilities and ordinary language age matched children with a focus on morphological aspect. The subjects of this stud... The purpose of this study was to examine the accuracy in the production of iInflected predicates in Adults with intellectual disabilities and ordinary language age matched children with a focus on morphological aspect. The subjects of this study was 20 persons including 10 adults with second to third degree intellectual disabilities and 10 ordinary age matched children. For the research task, we performed test of accuracy in the production of predicates. The test of predicate utilization consisted of 10 predicates and 5 endings. The test measured the accuracy of combination between those predicates and endings. The results of this study were as follows: First, adult group with intellectual disabilities showed a mean score of 35.90 and standard deviation of 12.574 in total score for accurate production of predicates. Meanwhile, the language age matched children group showed a mean score of 46.40 and standard deviation of 2.591, suggesting that there was a significant difference between the two groups in total scores for accurate production of predicates. Second, a significant difference was observed between adult group with intellectual disabilities and language age matched children group in total scores for accurate production of predicates based on regularity of predicates. Moreover, a difference was found to exist between the two groups in regularity. Furthermore, a statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of the effect of interaction based on group and regularity. A relatively large difference was found to exist between the two groups in accuracy of production of irregular predicates, compared to the production of regular predicates. In terms of production predicates by predicate depending on regularity, the results showed a significant difference between adult group with intellectual disabilities and language age matched children group in the words, such as a regular predicate 'insert', and irregular predicates 'build', 'walk', 'cute', 'paint colors', and 'blue'. Third, when we examined the accuracy in the production of predicates by ending, a significant difference in connection ending such as 'nikka (so)' and 'myeon (if)'was observed between the two groups. Fourth, no difference was found to exist between adult group with intellectual disabilities and language age matched children group in terms of frequency by error type and order of error rates. Particularly, auxiliary predicate utilization and predicate substitution error were observed only in adult group with intellectual disabilities. The results of this study suggested that adults with intellectual disabilities had difficulty with accurate production of predicates more than language age matched children did, and showed more production of irregular predicates. In conclusion, the above-mentioned results imply that guidance should be offered to children with intellectual disabilities who have linguistic difficulty during intervention constantly with interest in relation to the production of irregular predicates, considering that they still make mistakes in the production of irregular predicates even when they become adults, although they can learn the way to production regular predicates to some degree and can utilize regular predicates accurately. ，韩语论文，韩语毕业论文 |
