During informal debate, interrupting can function as a strategic method to achieve the purpose of the discussion and be provided a description of using aspects as functions. To provide a basic text for the education of debates in Korean education, thi...
During informal debate, interrupting can function as a strategic method to achieve the purpose of the discussion and be provided a description of using aspects as functions. To provide a basic text for the education of debates in Korean education, this study sets a concept and range of 'debates' & 'interrupting' and analyzed interrupting behavior during informal debates among Chinese Korean Language learners. It hasn't discussed interrupting behavior of informal debates in Korean education until now. Hence, it's difficult to analyze interrupting behavior in learners' groups objectively. For this reason, this study conducted the analysis of the informal discussion date for native Korean speakers first, and then it applied to be a criteria of the comparative analysis on the study of Korean language learners' interrupting behavior.
The results of the conversation's analysis, native Korean speakers and korean language learners used interrupting strategy to go on smoothly in debates. Also they both used this strategy to communicate their opinions effectively in debates.
However, the results of analysis for types of interrupting behavior, native Korean speakers use various conversation strategy while Korean language learners use the strategy restrictively. Besides, native Korean speakers use this strategy as purpose of the discussion in cooperation with each other although debates are competition conversations to clinch their arguments. On the other hand, Korean language learners use the strategy when they argue with others and these interrupting behavior lead to overheat their conversations and go so far as to interrupt a conversation.
Next, this study compared the types of native Korean speakers' and Korean language learners' interrupting behavior. As a result, even though both speakers' interrupting behavior have same functions in debates, there are some differences such as using methods or aspects of interrupting behavior.
Based on the above results, this study shows it's necessary for a methodical education of the interrupting behavior in Korean education. Furthermore, This study can be provided as practical basic data for debates education, textbook development and much more, for those who learn Korean language.
，免费韩语论文，韩语论文范文 |
