In Korean language, grammatical categories are realized through postpositional words and endings which belong to inflectional affix in terms of morphology. From the perspective of morphologic construction, it is very different from Chinese language wh... In Korean language, grammatical categories are realized through postpositional words and endings which belong to inflectional affix in terms of morphology. From the perspective of morphologic construction, it is very different from Chinese language which is categorized as an isolated language as an agglutinative language. In particular, endings in Korean language have morphologic combination restrictions with stems or other endings by simply participating as a word component and syntactic combination restrictions with other components in the sentence. Therefore, a lot of mistakes take place in using endings. Recently, there have been many studies on ending system in Korean language in Korean linguistics. Scholars have classified the ending system in detail and thoroughly investigated endings. Among them, this study has focused on causal conjunctive endings. In Korean language education as a foreign language, however, causal conjunctive endings in Korean language were partially compared to causal conjunctions in Chinese language. It’ almost impossible to find a study on analysis on mistakes in causal conjunctive endings for Korean language learners from Chinese-spoken countries and related education plan. Hence, this study has attempted to analyze the causes of mistakes in using the causal conjunctive endings in Korean language, which have been found among advanced learners who speak Chinese as mother tongue and come up with decent teaching & learning methods for causal conjunctive endings. This is structured as follows: In chapter 1, five common causal conjunctive endings (-aseo, -nikka, -meuro, -neurago and -gie) which are taught to Korean language learners are selected by referring to current Korean language course textbooks in Korea. In chapter 2, the syntactic, semantic and pragmatic characteristics of the five causal conjunctive endings are explained based on various scholars’opinions. In chapter 3, to investigate the common mistakes which occur in using endings, a questionnaire survey was conducted against 30 advanced Korean language learners from Chinese-spoken countries. The survey covers various aspects such as a way of cognition of causal conjunctive endings, discrimination skills and perception of syntactic & semantic restrictions and influence of mother tongue. In chapter 4, teaching & learning methods are established based on the results of the mistake analysis in chapter 3. This study has investigated common mistakes in using causal conjunctive endings in Korean language among advanced learners from Chinese-spoken countries and analyzed the causes of the mistakes. It is expected that the development of teaching & learning plans to cope with these mistakes would be very helpful for Korean language learners from Chinese-spoken countries to learn causal conjunctive endings. ，韩语毕业论文，韩语论文网站 |
