Chinese-Korean language and Korean language used to be the same language, However, due to the different views on Particle grammar, Chinese-Korean language and Korean language are heading in different directions. Through this thesis, the author wishes ...
Chinese-Korean language and Korean language used to be the same language, However, due to the different views on Particle grammar, Chinese-Korean language and Korean language are heading in different directions. Through this thesis, the author wishes that
Chinese-Korean language and Korean language can establish common point of view on the school grammar. Main content as follows.
Chapter two introduces the concept and the sorts of diversification.
Because of the different understandings of particles between Chinese-Korean language and Korean language, glossaries of grammatical terms are also different.
Besides the Particles of Korean language, the Particles of
Chinese-Korean language also includes termination. So "the Particles of Chinese-Korean language" is a broader concept than "the Particles of Korean language". In Chinese-Korean language, particle is not a word. Instead it is a part of word. So it can only be combined with
root or stem. Because of the different understanding of particles, the classification is also different.
The classification of particle in Chinese-Korean language has the following parts: Case-Particles, accessory word, narrative auxiliary, plural number Particles. In Korean grammar, plural number Particles is plural ending word. And narrative auxiliary falls under the subcategory
of Case-Particles.
Chapter three introduces the classification and characteristics of
Case-Particles. Chinese-Korean language has neither complemented lattice nor narrative Particles in the classification of Case-auxiliary Word. And accessory word falls under the subcategory of Case-Particles. In addition, accessory word has the subcategory of
Adverb case-Particles and absolute Particle which is not in the Korean grammar.
Case-Particles in Korean language is corresponding to sentence element, So even if the same form of particle appears in the different elements of sentence, it is considered to be same in Chinese-Korean language.
Chapter four introduces the classification and characteristics of
accessory word. Korean language has mainly looked at the meaning of words. While Chinese-Korean language has mainly looked at the relationship with the objects of a similar system, phenomena, mark.
Through this thesis, the author wishes that readers will have a deeper understanding of Chinese-Korean language. In addition, it contributes to one step closer to uniform syntax.
，韩语论文题目，韩语论文范文 |
