A discourse marker that is usually realized in spoken discourse performs diverse discourse functions as it is realized differently from its original meaning in particular discourse structures or circumstances. Such a discourse marker is realized in di...
A discourse marker that is usually realized in spoken discourse performs diverse discourse functions as it is realized differently from its original meaning in particular discourse structures or circumstances. Such a discourse marker is realized in diverse linguistic form including words and phrases, and it is a discourse tactics that the speaker uses to perform discourse effectively.
In this case, one of the major characteristics of the discourse marker is that its form is fixed. But the verb phrase discourse marker is freed from such limitations and has a characteristic that its form is not fixed. So, this study attempted to classify in detail the morphological, and syntactic characteristics and semantic functions of the verb phrase discourse marker which is freed from the characteristics of general discourse markers.
The data used for this purpose are ？the 21st Century Sejong Bundle of Words？ which is the primitive bundle of words containing 479,800 words and phrases. The verb phrase discourse markers could be extracted from the diverse discourse circumstances such as lectures, speeches, daily conversations, thematic conversations, and monologues, and based on this, the morphological and syntactic characteristics and the semantic functions of the verb phrase discourse markers？？mariya？, ？mueoya？, and ？itzana？ were discussed.
First, the conjugation of ？mariya？ was found to be limited to ？mariya, mariyeyo, marimnida, mariji, marijo, and maringa？ and it could be expressed in the assertive mood, the interrogative mood, and the exclamatory mood, but it could not be expressed in the imperative mood and the persuasive mood.. Particularly in syntactically, it was used in the middle of, and at the end of a sentence, and it had the functions of ？emphasizing utterance？, ？focusing？, ？simple emphasis on the preceding information？, ？gaining time？, ？confirming and emphasizing the preceding information？, and ？responding to the preceding information？.
The conjugation of ？mueoya？ was found to be ？mueonya？, mueoralka？, ？mueoya？, ？mueomnika？, ？mueoji？, ？mueoyeyo？, ？, ？mueoyeotji？, ？mueodeora？, ？mueojyo？, and its conjugation was possible only in the assertive mood, the interrogative mood, and the exclamatory mood, but not possible in the imperative mood and the persuasive mood. Syntactically, it was used in the beginning and the middle of a sentence, and it had the functions of ？gaining time？, ？negative attitude？, ？inducing interest？, and ？focusing.？
The conjugation of ？itzana？ was found to be ？itzana, itzanayo, itzi, itzyo？, and its conjugation was possible on in the interrogatory mood, and was not possible in the rest. This researcher judged that it was because ？itzana？ was still left with the interrogative form. Syntactically, it was used in the beginning and in the middle of a sentence, and it had the functions of starting a topic, linking and changing topic, drawing attention and inducing interest, showing polite attitude, gaining time, and emphasizing.
Through this research, the conjugation of the verb phrase discourse markers can partly be possible, but many limitations existed and it could be seen that when it was used in daily conversation, their conjugation appeared only in limited forms.
Finally, the verb phrase discourse marker contained many functions in the circumstances of spoken discourse. So it is deemed necessary to make researches on discourse markers by using more practical data.
，韩语论文，韩语论文 |
