The aim of this thesis is to contrast and investigate the conditional expressions in Japanese and Korean.
A counter-factual condition is the same as a suppositive condition in that the previous clause is not realized, but it is different from a suppo...
The aim of this thesis is to contrast and investigate the conditional expressions in Japanese and Korean.
A counter-factual condition is the same as a suppositive condition in that the previous clause is not realized, but it is different from a suppositive condition in that past tense can appear in subsequent clause. And in Korean, there is a form which is used only in a counter -factual condition which represents the opposite of the past events as a condition. Therefore, in this thesis we classified sequent conjunctive conditional expressions and contrasting conjunctive conditional expressions respectively in a counter-factual condition and a suppositive condition as a form of independent conditional expressions. Also, we contrasted and investigated not only sequent conjunctive conditional expressions but also contrasting conjunctive conditional expressions in Japanese and Korean.
We divided conditional expressions into sequent conjunctive conditional expressions and contrasting conjunctive conditional expressions. and both of them have a generalized condition, a suppositive condition, a counter-factual condition, and an established condition as their subcagegories. We contrast and investigate the meaning and usage of Japanese and Korean conditional expression forms in some examples. The consequences are summed up as following.
1. The Japanese forms representing a generalized condition are to, ba, and tara and the Korean ones are -myun, and -eoya. It is natural to correspond to, ba, tara and -myun in all usage, but it is unnatural to directly correspond -eoya to to, ba, and tara in any other usage except 'proverbs'. The reason is that even though -eoya can express a generalized condition, -eoya strongly expresses an essential condition in meaning. In case of 'proverbs', is used restrictively according to the meaning.
2. The Japanese forms representing a sequent conjunctive suppositive condition are to, ba, tara and nara, and the Korean ones are -myun, -keodyn, -eoya. Although tara and -myun are used in all usage in descriptive utterances and performative utterances, tara and -myun are restricted in other forms. to is used only in conjectural usage in descriptive utterances and performative utterances, but nara is used in all usage in performative utterances. ba is used in descriptive utterances, but is used restrictively in performative utterances. -keodyn is used in 'command', 'suggestion', and 'will' of performative utterances, and -eoya is used in 'question', 'will' and 'conjecture' of performative utterances.
3. The Japanese forms representing a sequent conjunctive counter- factual condition are ba, tara and nara, and the Korean ones are -myun, -damyun, -deoramyun, -ussumyun, -deondul and -eoya. The usage of each sequent conjunctive counter-factual condition is different in case that the previous clause and the subsequent clause are all false, and in case that the previous clause is true, but the subsequent clause is false, and according to the tense of the previous clause. -eossdeoramyun, -eossdeondul, -eosseoya are used only when the previous clause represents the opposite of past events as a condition.
4. The Japanese forms representing a sequent conjunctive established condition are to, ba, tara, nara and the Korean ones are -myun, -keodyn, -ja, -ni(gga), -deoni, and -eossdeoni. The usage of these forms are different according to the tense of the subsequent clause.
5. The Japanese form representing a contrasting conjunctive suppositive condition is temo, and the Korean ones are -ado, -deorado, -ljirado. In these forms the expected subsequent clause is not formed, even though the previous clause are formed. It is common that all the forms are the 'opposite condition' of the presupposition sentence, and that they include the implicational meaning of the previous clause.
6. The Japanese form representing a contrasting counter-factual condition is nara and the Korean ones are -ado, -deorado and -ljirado. It is common in Japanese and Korean that a contrasting conjunctive counter-factual condition in a subsequent clause is not affected and the result is not changed even if the previous clause is formed, and that the previous clause is not a necessary condition but a sufficient condition in forming the subsequent clause. But the difference is that although temo cannot express past tense, -ado, -deorado and -ljirado is always used, combined with -eoss(ass), a past tense morpheme, when the previous clause represents the opposite of past events.
7. The Japanese forms representing a contrasting conjunctive established condition are temo, and noni and the Korean ones are -ado, -deorado, -ljirado, -neondedo. temo, -ado, -deorado and -ljirado imply that the previous clause is not the only condition, and the condition other than the previous clause can be a condition that forms the subsequent clause. noni and -nyndedo include a speaker's 'unexpected events', 'surprise' and 'the feeling of not understanding', about the contrasting conjunctive events.
The consequence of this thesis is that we contrasted the contrasting conjunctive conditional expressions in Japanese and Korean which were not treated in previous studies, and that a counter-factual condition and a suppositive condition are classified separately, and that we investigated a variety of Korean conditional expressions corresponding to the Japanese conditional expressions.
，韩语毕业论文，韩语毕业论文 |
