| （摘要内容经过系统自动伪原创处理以避免复制，德语论文网站，下载原文正常，内容请直接查看目录。） 中东方的传统文学中一向都不乏“坏女人”的抽象。跟着女权活动的鼓起和女性认识的觉悟，德语论文网站，很多女性作家开端质疑和重塑这些在以男性为主导的社会中背负着千百年骂名的女性抽象。这类抽象重构工程的意义其实不仅仅在于为“坏女人”正名，同时也是女性作家对社会性别权利系统的一种研讨和对女性本身处境的反思。本文以中德两位现代有名女作家的长篇小说，克里斯塔·沃尔夫的《美狄亚·声响》和李碧华的《潘弓足之宿世此生》为例，借助性别实际，对两部著作从内容到叙事技能两个层面停止比拟剖析，阐释两位女作家对中东方传统文学中两个有名的“坏女人”一美狄亚和潘弓足一所做的重构任务，试图在中德比拟的语境下商量“坏女人”骂名在社会权利系统中的成因和女性解脱被臭名化的前途地点，以期在中德跨文明日耳曼学的研究框架内停止一项新的摸索测验考试。本文第一部门引见了性别实际的根本内容，并依据性别实际在文学范畴的研究重点，肯定了本文的剖析将聚焦在以下四个方面，即重塑汗青文明语境中“坏女人”的抽象、建构性其余权利机制、女性解脱臭名的前途和叙事战略。在第二部门，即本论文的主体部门，起首梳理了美狄亚和潘弓足的故事原型及其文学成长，然后具体剖析了《美狄亚·声响》和《潘弓足之宿世此生》中两个新的女性抽象，同时试图商量女主人公解脱臭名的前途。论文注解，两位女作家都在其故事新编中质疑和推翻了男性作家所构建的美狄亚和潘弓足的“坏女人”抽象：前者不再是希腊喜剧年夜师欧里庇得斯笔下残暴的复仇女神，既没有因恋爱损失明智，出卖父亲、故国，更没有毒逝世情敌、弑兄杀子，而只是一个无辜的替罪羊，是一个近乎完善的女人。后者也不再是兰陵笑笑生笔下的“世界第一淫妇”，而是最根本的情欲需求得不到知足的不幸人。另外，沃尔夫和李碧华都在著作中提醒了构建性其余权利机制。在这一被巴特勒视为“话语权利”的机制中，两位女主人公都处于弱势位置，被消除在"话语以外。她们由于违反了父权制请求女性遵照的社会标准和品德准则而招致被臭名化的效果。而这一权利机制的表示情势各具中东方文明特点。在沃尔夫的小说中表示为源自于圣经的替罪羊机制，而在李碧华的小说中则表示为源自于释教轮回论的业机制。究其缘由，都源自于男性对另类女性的恐怖和排挤。分歧的是，沃尔夫所揭穿的替罪羊机制的受益者不局限于女性，而是触及存在于某一社会文明中的被视作他者的一切弱势群体。是以，沃尔夫的小说超出了女性主题，其存眷的核心扩大到了人类社会中广泛存在的遭到个人危害的他者。两位女作家还对女性的前途成绩做了分歧水平的商量，都经由过程女主人公表达了战争的志愿。美狄亚从始至终都信任息争的力气，而潘弓足在如愿以偿地报仇雪耻以后懊悔不跌，认识到本身要的基本不是复仇。沃尔夫更是表达出对一个融会的世界，一个乌托邦的向往。经由过程对叙事战略的剖析，可以发明两位女作家采取了分歧的叙事技能以完成重构女性的目标。沃尔夫摒弃了单一叙事者，采取多种声响的叙事战略。而李碧华一方面采取了被视为具有男性叙事特点的全知万能的叙事视角，另外一方面参加人物视角作为弥补。 Abstract: There is always a "bad woman" in the traditional Chinese literature. Along with the feminist movement arisen and women know consciousness, many women writers began to question and reshape these in a male dominated society burdened with women for thousands of years the infamy of abstraction. The significance of this abstract class reconstruction project in fact, not only is the name for the "bad woman", and was also the women writers of gender rights system a discussion and women themselves situation reflection. In this paper, the German two modern famous writer's novel, Christa Wolf "Medea" sound, and Li Bihua's "pan Gongzu the night life" as an example, with the actual sex, the two works from the content to the narrative skills in two aspects of comparative analysis, interpretation of the two female writers the reconstruction task of two famous "bad woman" in the oriental traditional literature in Medea and Pan Gongzu do, trying to discuss the "match in the German context bad woman" in social rights system in infamy and causes of women's liberation is notoriously the future location, in order to study in the framework of Sino German cross the civilization Germanistik stop a new groping test. The first part of this article introduces the actual sex basic content and according to gender actual in the field of literature research focus, affirmed the the analysis will focus on the following four aspects, namely reshaping history and culture in the context of "bad women" abstraction, construction of the rest right mechanism, female free notorious future and narrative strategy. In the second part, is the main section of the chapeau combing the story prototype of Medea and Pan Gongzu and literature development, and specific analysis of the Medea, sound "and" pan Gongzu places the world in this lifetime, two new female image, while trying to discuss the heroine extricate the notoriety of the future. The annotation, two female writers are in the Old Tales Retold questioned and overthrow the male writers to construct the Medea and Pan Gongzu "bad woman" Abstract: the former is no longer Greek comedy the eve of the division by Euripides cruel vengeance, neither love because of the loss of the wise, the seller's father and the motherland, and no toxic death rival, regicide brother infanticide, but only an innocent scapegoat is a near perfect woman. The latter is no longer is Lanling Xiaoxiaosheng pen "the world's first woman", but the most fundamental sensual needs not contented unfortunate people. In addition, Wolf and Li Bihua are in the works to remind the construction of the rest of the rights mechanism. In the mechanism of Butler as the "discourse right", the two women are in a weak position, which is eliminated in the "Discourse". Because they violate the social standard and moral principles of the women who have been asked to comply with the patriarchal system, they are the result of being smelly. And this mechanism of the right to show the characteristics of the different forms of Oriental civilization. In Woolf's novels expressed as derived from the Bible the scapegoat mechanism, in Li Bihua novel is derived from the Buddhist theory of reincarnation of industry mechanism. The reason is derived from the male to the alternative female terror and exclusion. The difference is that Wolf is the victim of the scapegoat mechanism is not limited to women, but touched on the existence of a social civilization in the other is regarded as the other vulnerable groups. Wolf's novels are beyond the female theme, and the core of his family has been extended to the other people who have been widely existed in human society. The two women writers have also made different levels of the future achievements of women to discuss, through the process of the heroine to express the war volunteers. Medea from beginning to end all trust information war effort, and Pan Gongzu fulfiled to revenge after regret not stumble, know to itself to the basic not revenge. Wolf is to express a fusion of the world, a utopia. Through the analysis of the narrative strategy, we can find that the two women writers have adopted different narrative skills to accomplish the goal of reconstructing the female. Wolf abandoned the single narrative, to take a variety of sound narrative strategy. And Li Bihua has taken is regarded as a male character of narrative omniscient universal narrative point of view, on the other hand in figural point of view as a remedy. 目录: |
