With the emergence of the era of governance along with social and administrative change, there has been a widespread belief that policy making by government is not a unilateral act of a national institution, but the result of interaction between vario... With the emergence of the era of governance along with social and administrative change, there has been a widespread belief that policy making by government is not a unilateral act of a national institution, but the result of interaction between various actors, including the private sector. Further, it has been inevitable for a variety of actors such as civil society to engage in the policy-making process. In terms of governance, however, relations between the government and civil society in Korea are still at the formal level rather than cooperation and assistance. This status indicates that governance is led by the government without being aware of partnership with civil society and private sector. It is required to ensure a continuous process to pursue partnership for policy in the relations between the government and civil society by institutional supplementation and efforts beyond a partial and instrumental level in order to achieve polycracy governance. Accordingly, the government commission system allows performing governmental functions based on agreement, which secures democracy and responsibility in administration. For this goal, this study aims to conduct empirical analysis for engagement by appointed members in the private sector such as civil society among policy actors who participate in policy-making process based on “government commission,” a council system organization in which various actors in policy-making process to address common issues in terms of governance. Among members who belong to government commissions based on those under the central administrative government agencies, appointed members except for ex officio members whose majority are government members are classified into four categories (broadcasting and media, civic group, interest group, specialist group) of “unofficial actors.” In addition, government commissions are examined in diverse perspectives by dividing them based on characteristics (administrative commission, advisory commission, simple advisory commission, deliberative and legislative commission), each year (2013, 2014, 2015, 2016) and department (each commission under central administrative departments without engagement by civic groups). With this process, the status is compared and analyzed in various terms by checking if there is any difference in the proportion of members in each analysis unit (ex officio members, appointed members), the number of unofficial actors is similar, and there is any difference in unofficial actors depending on a commission; if so, what difference they have. The results of analysis are as follows: First, the results of analysis for engagement by unofficial actors based on each characteristic of government commission indicate significant difference in the administrative commission and simple advisory commission. While the level of participation by civil society is the highest in the simple advisory commission in which the proportion of authority and role is low, the administrative commission, which has the quasi-administrative and quasi-judicial authority with administrative executive power, has the lowest level of participation by civil society. The specialist group has the highest proportion based on each characteristic of commission, whereas engagement by broadcasting and media is extremely low in all types of commissions; this indicates little difference in each characteristic of government commissions. Second, according to the results of analysis for engagement by unofficial actors in government commissions based on each year, little difference was found in the year of 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016, but similar distribution was indicated. This highlights that the characteristics of government commissions which are influenced by change of government are shown similarly by empirical analysis as all the above-mentioned years are in the current government. Next, the analysis of engagement by unofficial actors in each department of government commissions results in significant difference. Distribution of appointed members and unofficial actors is different depending on the characteristics of government departments. The Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism has the highest ratio of participation by ex officio members in which majority are government members and the extremely low level of participation by members appointed from the private sector. The Ministry of Education has the highest level of engagement by unofficial actors among private appointed members. Despite the ministry in charge of government commissions, the Ministry of Government Administration and Home Affairs has the lowest level of engagement. In the analysis of each department, the “specialist group” accounts for 80% or over in unofficial actors, and the highest impact by the characteristics of government departments and commissions is given to the “interest group.” It is also indicated that engagement by media and civic groups among unofficial actors is very low and shows little difference in each analysis unit. Based on such results, this study has the following implications: first, this study has implications in empirical research in which data are built up based on complete enumeration for members who engage in government commissions and any participation by private appointed members such as civil society in the actual policy-making process by government is analyzed. Second, this study has implications in providing extensive understanding and various interpretations for engagement in policy process by classifying private appointed members in government commissions. Lastly, this study seeks to examine government commissions under the central administrative departments based on characteristics, years and departments along with the classification of private appointed members and conducts polyphasic analytical tasks for engagement in policy process to find important differences. Accordingly, this study has significance in finding actual difference in the proportion of engagement by members depending on each characteristic, year and department of government commissions. ，免费韩语论文，韩语论文题目 |
